Vyacheslav Volodin, the speaker of the lower house of parliament and an ally of President Vladimir Putin, said a new bill would tackle the “ideology of childlessness.”

Russia’s fight against the West and its values has taken aim this week at an “ideology” that the Kremlin and its allies say threatens the country’s very foundations: people not wanting to have children.

Lawmakers have proposed a ban on “propaganda of conscious refusal to bear children,” Vyacheslav Volodin, the speaker of the lower house of parliament and an ally of President Vladimir Putin, said in a post on Telegram on Tuesday.

It is the latest effort by authorities to combat the demographic strain of falling birth rates, exacerbated by the war in Ukraine, which the Kremlin says could threaten the country’s long-term outlook. In July, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov called Russia’s declining birth rate “catastrophic for the future of the nation.”

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 小时前

    Can we get the .ml crew in here to explain why this is actually good and freedom? Because I’m a little confused.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      25 分钟前

      Come on, .ml, tell us how the west has fallen and Russia is the last true bastion of civilization and people’s rights. We’re waiting.

    • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      52 分钟前

      At the most the only thing that can be said is that the article says “could” and a law is “proposed”. That is already concerning but it is not reality yet at least.

      I don’t know enough about Russian law if this maybe just means the guy told another guy while taking a piss in a toilet or if there was an official meeting and tomorrow it is voted on.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 小时前

      I too am curious what this has to do with socialism and how it is not simply campist brain rot.

    • Trailblazing Braille Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 小时前

      💡If we simply make it illegal to… not have children? No, that’s not right. Not want to have children? No, impossible to enforce. Ah, it must be illegal to profess the lack of desire to have children. What a beautiful and simple law that will certainly address the root cause of falling birth rates.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    8 小时前

    You know, I would bet there’s tens of thousands of Russians that would be interested in having children if they didn’t all have a case of unnecessary deadness. If only something could have been done to avoid that.

    • Draghetta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 小时前

      But if you can’t send them to get gunned down in a foreign land, what is even the point of having more children? Do you hear yourself?

  • 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 小时前

    Keep making life shitty and it will happen all on its own anyway. Hell making it a law might Streisand Effect it.

    Here’s this one cool hack they don’t want you to know about. Governments hate it!

  • Cris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 小时前

    Does anyone know the strategic reason for right wing authoritarians prioritizing people having kids? Like project 2025 talks about it a bunch, but nothing totally clear cut comes to mind as to why. At least not that feels like it fully justifies how clearly important it is, and that isn’t just me dismissing it as meaningless control or whatever. It feels strategically important

    In this case it’s clearly important militarily, but that’s also not likely to help in the present conflict in Ukraine. It’ll take a long time for those kids to grow up, but at least they’d help mitigate population loss

    • Sop
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 小时前

      More working class children means that there will be more people to exploit in the future. The size of the working class population is extremely important for the generation of wealth because they’re basically the only ones doing productive labour.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 小时前

      Traditional values used to subjugate women. That’s really it. The same reason they hate abortion. Pregnancy and children are traditionally ways to control womem. “Keep em barefoot and pregnant” and so forth.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 小时前

      They want to grow the population in order to have more workers and consumers. There’s also a white nationalist component where they’re afraid that white people will become a minority and they’ll use this demographic power to agitate for more equality, which is basically oppression to those people (because if it was only about economic growth, they’d be pro migration).

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 小时前

      The wealthy are running a massive pyramid scheme and need a constant influx of plebs to support the bottom tiers.

    • hungryphrog
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 小时前

      Putler absolutely would send preteens to Ukraine if he started running out of adults.

    • shaun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 小时前

      Corporations need consumers (constant growth model). Military needs more living soldiers.

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 小时前

        Yeah, I guess that feels like the obvious reason. It just feels like there’s gotta be something more immediate and tangible. Maybe there isn’t though 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • resetbypeer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 小时前

    I hate headlines with the word could. Remind me when it has or is. I could become a billionaire but it’s highly unlikely I will. Just like her fine or the arrest of Putin.

    • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 小时前

      I think there’s a time between “This thing is possible I guess” and “you’re already fucked” that I’d like to hear about things.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 小时前
    NBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for NBC News:

    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/putin-calls-international-scheme-promoting-russian-values-rcna165338
    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/russia-proposes-ban-child-free-lifestyle-rcna172616

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support