I am toying with a new PC build and wanted to check how good new CPUs are compated to a bit older ones, and yeah cpu.userbenchmark have never been that good but usually you could get an idea by comparison.

Now it’s neanderthal name calling and blunt intel promotion, what’s happening??

  • Bezier@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    UserBenchmark is a joke. They aren’t just biased in a normal way, but rather they have an obsession on AMD and throw lots of weird insults like this.

  • vividspecter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 months ago

    Userbenchmark have a long running grudge against AMD. I’m not sure why, but they therefore aren’t a trustworthy source.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 months ago

      Whoever operates user benchmark these days is not mentally stable. Like legitimately off the deep end. The amount of defensive projection and “my tribe is better than your tribe” bullshit they vomit out these days is so ridiculous that not even a paid shill would post 90% of it. It’s a basement dweller with no life trying to find something to be a part of.

  • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 months ago

    They’ve been full on unstable nonsense since the day Ryzen dropped.

    They immediately started playing games with their metric to make Intel win.

  • HEXN3T
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    The April Fool’s joke that never ends.