I mean there’s Reddit ofc, as well as Twitter in its entirety, Discord is implementing some dumb updates, there are issues with Tumblr as well as everything to do with Meta, and I’m sure there are plenty more (and I haven’t even touched other digital media, for example the Sims). Why is it all happening in the span of about a couple months?

  • aragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lets take the example of Reddit. Reddit could have kept its costs to the minimum and could have run the site with the ad revenue that came in. In fact they could have talked transparently about their opex and asked for a simple donation drive every now and then like Wikipedia. If need be, they could have removed silly GIF replies and other stuff and focused on text alone. However this would not let them become the next Facebook. That’s what they wanted to be. At some point in their story was a choice to be forums 2.0 or get into a race to become a cash grab. Sadly they went for the latter.

    • Gargleblaster@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      n fact they could have talked transparently about their opex and asked for a simple donation drive every now and then like Wikipedia.

      Let’s remember this about Kbin and the Fediverse.

      I would donate to help counterbalance the wave of migration that brought me here.

    • MetricExpansion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In fact they could have talked transparently about their opex and asked for a simple donation drive every now and then like Wikipedia.

      This reminds me of when Reddit used to show their monthly server costs and ask that people get gold to help offset it?

  • dragontamer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s the money.

    US Fed has raised interest rates, destroying money for the first time in decades in an effort to stop our inflation problem

    The knock on effects is that banks literally have less money to lend to companies. Some companies are affected more than others by this environment. Tech was hit hard, extremely hard.

    With hundreds of thousands of layoffs, tech industry is contracting. Silicon Valley bank literally evaporated in the span of 3 days. Twitter was losing money and had to sell out. StackOverflow is losing money and is currently selling out.

    In this environment, Reddit is about to launch it’s long awaited IPO, the time when the public is allowed to directly buy Reddit stock and invest into the company. That’s what Initial Public Offering means. If Reddit does well, Reddit will pull in lots of money this year through this IPO.

    The CEO of Reddit needs to prove Reddit is profitable, or if not profitable… Will eventually be profitable. Stockholders don’t care about Reddit drama for the most part, but most are smart enough to read financial sheets. Reddit needs to show growing revenue, growing profits and cutting costs to attract money.

    As such, all of what Reddit’s CEO has done makes sense in the context of the IPO. He is betting that shareholders won’t notice the drop of high quality content creators from Reddit, since that’s not a financial number that’s reported. He can IPO, raising millions, maybe even billions for himself. The golden parachute outta here when everything gets screwed up in a year or two and collapses.

    I think today’s investors are smarter though, and the bearish economy and high interest rates means more investors will pay attention to underlying issues.

    • TeoTwawki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I disagree in it really making sense (at least long term, but I recognize this is also “normal” for these corporate types) - it destroys long term viability for short term goals.

      Happens all over the corporate world. They are encouraged to operate this way usually the guy there when the actions were taken getz out well before those long term consequences arrive. Hopefully Steve does bear the consequences himself, he dezerves it for being a horrible person in general.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Generally the drama isn’t a big deal. But in a specific case the only value of the site is in the community moderation and the depth of data on the site.

      He needs investors to buy in but he also needs advertisers to buy in. Advertisers do not love paying for negative drama.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think that Reddit can compete against Youtube, Facebook, or TikTok with regards to ads.

        They can make some money, yes. But Reddit will never have high-end ad revenue, not with its current model (or any changes they’re making).

    • merpthebirb
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, investors are going to be even more inclined to identify exactly why the platform might be successful in the future. They’re not going to blindly throw money at new IPOs (as much) because debt isn’t free anymore.

    • Zpiritual@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Indeed. VC is going into “AI” instead so now services have to be financially sustainable. And that is not really the problem, it’s when companies intentionally do it in a way that fuck the user.

      • Acetamide@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sustainable as interpreted by a non-techie bean counter looking at maximising next quarter’s profits and ignoring everything past that.

  • Kir@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    1 year ago

    Economy is going bad, interest rate are up, and all Silicon Valley’s company are built upon VC loans and expansion goals. Scale economy is bound to fail, and it’s happening now.

    • preciouspupp@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the answer. There was a lot of free money and now there isn’t. Companies gotta cough up profits or go bust.

  • sourcery@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    1 year ago

    Search for ‘Enshittification’ if you want a pretty good analysis of what’s going on. But basically greed, capitalism and the never ending pursuit of growth.

      • Makr Alland@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        71
        ·
        1 year ago

        Workers created Reddit, like everything else. Economic systems don’t create anything, only determine who profits from those creations.

      • iByteABit@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Capitalism is good at creating things, but terrible at maintaining their quality over time, because at the end of the day profits don’t always go hand in hand with product quality

        • odigo2020@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The sad truth. For example, Insta Pot has gone bankrupt recently because they built their stuff too well, and no one needed to buy more than one. Capitalism is the reason we have planned obsolescence and deliberately poor build quality of products.

      • skillissuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s not, the primary objective is to rake in ever bigger heaps of money. this is just a side effect

          • ilikekeyboards@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve never seen a more stupid comment. Your attempt at a satirical remark is at a kindergarten level. From reading it I deduct you believe there are no other solutions to it.

            There are solutions to it. You’d find them if you used your cognition beyond playground squabble

  • RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Capitalism slowly shits up everything. Even the things it helps create.

    I mean this in the most general way possible. Not just platforms. Even if reddit was profitable it would still continue. It’s just part of the cycle of seeking not just profits but ever rising profits.

    It’s just more obvious lately on digital platforms because it has been kind of compressed into smaller amounts of time.

    That which is free must find a way to cost.

    That that makes money must find a way to make more.

    And slowly but surely its takes on a fine shine. A glean seen from a distance. But when you get close you realize. “oh, its fucking shit all over it.”

      • bilbofraggins@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah… I mean, we on one hand, we now grow plenty of food to feed almost 8 billion people, cured polio, greatly extended lifespan all over the globe… But on the other hand (waves hand at everything).

        Eternal growth on a finite planet ain’t possible, but capitalism demands it. ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

        • hydra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m all pro-tech and pro-advancements myself but I agree we’re reaching a stage where we need to start degrowing

      • sznio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hard for it to be otherwise, considering it affects almost everything.

        I’d rather focus on publicly traded companies as the main root of evil before dealing with capitalism itself. Private companies tend to not be so destructive - many are fine staying where they are, instead of growing infinitely like cancer, eating everything around them.

        • Richard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This! It is not like private companies per se are the problem, but rather megacorporations that are pressured to generate unimaginable and entirely unsustainable profits that required to increase from year to year. Private companies must not necessarily be more unsustainable than publicly-owned (by this I mean state-owned) corporations.

  • Faendol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    Public companies are legally required to always do their best to grow year over year. Eventually these companies get so large they can’t realistically get more market share so they have to figure out how to make more money from their users. This leads to them squeezing users for cash in the hunt for short term gains because they’ve already realistically capped out on how much money they can make per year. It’s a dumb system that can’t work in the long term.

    • Echo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      A business corporation is organized and carried on primarily for the profit of the stockholders. The powers of the directors are to be employed for that end. The discretion of directors is to be exercised in the choice of means to attain that end, and does not extend to a change in the end itself, to the reduction of profits, or to the nondistribution of profits among stockholders in order to devote them to other purposes.

      This was pulled from Case law on the fiduciary duty of directors to maximize the wealth of corporate shareholders with a few more cases sometimes in favor of the business and others in favor of the shareholder. If anyone else wants to read some more on this. Reading some more based on what searches I find it seems like in reality it complicated. But I’m just a individual contributor all of this is above my knowledge grade.

      I do agree though that this model is not realistic long term. Eventually you need to jump into other markets to continue your growth or just squeeze your user base / customers dry.

    • Silviecat44@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know the system prevents it but they should just be happy with making a steady amount of income each year

      • Faendol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Private companies absolutely can, what sucks is alot of owners are looking for a public exit so they can make a ton of money and step away from the company. Valve is a great example of a private company happy to sit back and rake in cash. They have no plans to go public and can continue slowly improving their product because of it.

  • Noedel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think also we’ve become so dependent that they can just do whatever the fuck they want.

    I’ve lived in a bunch of countries and FB messenger is the only way for me to keep in touch. FB can do whatever they want to me because I’m never going to persuade a bunch of people to all move to signal or something.

    Reddit has communities that simply don’t exist on any other platform.

    They have the critical mass.

    • dystop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s basically the lifecycle of any big corporation.

      When the industry is new and there’s tons of new users to reach, everyone tries to be the most friendly corporation to build a name for themselves. Positive press and the halo effect helps bring in more people.

      Once an industry matures and growth slows, the focus shifts to nickle-and-diming customers to squeeze more profit out of them.

    • wildeaboutoskar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was going to say that I wish there was a decentralised way of sending messages… And then I remembered text messaging is a thing.

      Incredible how quickly these things become embedded in everyday life

  • got2best@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the free money train in leaving the station and everyone is scrambling to be profitable. But that’s just an assumption based on twitch and Reddit right now.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    All these companies have done about as much growing as they can. I remember listening to the radio on my drive to work a year or two ago, and they were talking about how Facebook had done internal research and concluded that they had captured something like 95% of the possible user demographics, meaning that they were unlikely to be able to reach new customers because either you have Facebook and you use it, or you’ve already heard of it and you don’t want it/don’t use it anymore.

    It was interesting, because Facebook/Meta, like Twitter, Reddit, Discord and Tumblr are all for-profit companies that exist to make money, and yet, the expectation of infinite growth from the market never ceases. There will never be a time when the company has grown “enough”. Enter the short-term smash-and-grab strategies. The idea is that they know that their business model has peaked in terms of growth and profit and they now need to extract value from the company before the market catches up to that fact. Social media is inherently unprofitable. Nobody wants to actually pay for it, and they do not produce a product, so eventually once the ad revenue has reached critical mass, the users become the product and are essentially ransomed off. Reddit just tried to pass the buck onto the 3rd party app developers rather than the users, but since the API restrictions affects regular users as much as it does developers, it had the same effect.

    Suffice to say, unless you are a member of a social media platform that is a non profit, this is going to keep happening. Even if you land on a site that prides themselves on being excellent stewards of their company and never prioritize profits and growth over stability and customer satisfaction, eventually they will be forced to make a decision - lose a lot of money or lose some customers. The answer, sadly, is all too obvious to them by now.

    • merpthebirb
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. Once capitalism completes the growth phase of the latest boom-bust cycle, companies start focusing on increasing revenue. Turns out when the economy starts declining people aren’t willing to spend money on random shit. People didn’t want to spend money on it during the boom, they’re even less likely to do so as their expenses go up and wages stay stagnate. A truly idiotic economic system.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good news.

        Computers are much cheaper and text is very low bandwidth. A $100/month server will be able to host a large chunk of us, and donations will likely be able to cover these meager costs.

        Without a need to grow exponentially, we can mostly sit happy on single physical server and $100/month (or so) independent instances.

        No need to build $million+ data centers like the big boys. We can take advantage of our small size instead.

        • JunkMuffler@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          That being said… I think that we as users should monetarily support our instances. I do support the instance I use for Mastodon. I will do the same for Lemmy once I settle on one.

      • flakeshake@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Lemmys developers mostly fund themselves by a grant of the Dutch NLNet Foundation, they have talked about it in the past.

    • _number8_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Social media is inherently unprofitable. Nobody wants to actually pay for it, and they do not produce a product

      i miss when people were just excited to be able to chat with others online

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, I agree. Sometimes I yearn for the halcyon days of “Web 1.0”, before the corporations muscled their way in and took what regular people built from the ground up and perverted it into a mechanism of capitalism and corporate greed. It was like the wild west and every session was an adventure.

        Maybe I just have rose tinted glasses on, but it seemed to me like the internet was a more pleasant place when things were more decentralized.

  • stephfinitely@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because of capitalism, no seriously these decisions are based on money and growth. But both of these things are relatively finite. You can’t keep have exponential growth year after year. Eventually you will plateau but there isnt a mechanism in capitalism to accept that. So companies start forcing monetary gain.

    • LChitman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the root of it. Reddit is not profitable (like twitter) and between my experience of Reddit over the years and stuff spez said in recent interviews, and the whole blackout situation recently, it’s obvious that profit is the main driver for the business. It’s funny referring to Reddit as a business, but that is now its primary purpose and descriptor.

      I imagine the past few years have had a knock-on effect on social media businesses including Reddit, just as it has for the energy, food etc industries. What are the margins per user for ads served? It’s got to be razor thin these days especially when Reddit employs thousands of people doing who knows what. I know they had to hold off their IPO due to the market and recently laid off some staff, they are clearly in bad shape as a business.

  • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    Greed. It’s all driven by greed. It’s not just social media companies either. My best guess to why it’s happening now… The boomers are aging out and want to take every last bit they can squeeze out before they retire/die.