• hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    29 days ago

    Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy deserves a good adaptation, rather than that trash movie and that too short BBC series.

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      29 days ago

      I would love that, I dont think the movie is terrible, its just that everything after Ford and Arthur get thrown out the airlock isnt as funny or absurd as the books. The main issue is the first 2ish books are unadaptable because there is no central conflict (or arleast the main cast dosent care or know there was supposed to be one).

      Zaphod is the only person with motivation to do anything other than to continue existing, and he is unaware (or dosen’t care) he is being hunted until they meet those suprisingly progessive law enforcment officers on Magrathea and when he visits the guides publishing offices.

      • aredditimmigrant@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        The BBC series does up to them being on >!prehistoric hairdresser and middle management earth!< Iirc

        Which I’m pretty sure is the third book. But I haven’t read it in a loooooong time.

        • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          Wha… really? I’ve seen the BBC HHGTTG, but I’ve never even heard they did the sequels!

          Book 2 was Restaurant at the End of the Universe, and book 3 was Life, the Universe, and Everything.

          Two books followed… So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish and Mostly Harmless constituted Books 4 & 5, but were detached from the main characters and plot.

  • Meltrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    29 days ago

    Always felt like that Eragon series could have been good. Too bad they never made a movie for it. Never once. I’m sure it would have been solid if they had. But they didn’t.

    • feannag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      I think they are making an Eragon adaptation (for the first time, of course). I think Disney+ is making a series, similar to them restarting Percy Jackson.

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        Oh boy. Disney adaptation track record is very hit or miss. I hope they don’t mess this one up like the last adaptation.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      Ah, it appears you have forgotten or have simply Mandela’d in from a different timeline. Allow me to refresh your memory for you in the kindest way possible:

      Eragon was a 2006 dance film featuring Jeremy Irons and Ed Speeler on a ship. Some fighting is involved. And I dunno, a dragon maybe.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I feel the same way about Avatar: The Last Airbender. It would have been such an amazing movie, or perhaps even a series. But alas, they’ve never attempted it once.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      29 days ago

      For being what I would consider one of the founding fathers of cyberpunk, I’m surprised there hasn’t been a Neuromancer film yet. Especially when so many of the tropes we know from the cyberpunk genre originated from Neuromancer, to begin with.

      • invertedspear@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        The question is do they stick with the existing Johnny Mnemonic movie as the prequel story, recap it in an intro scene, or ignore it completely?

      • herrvogel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        28 days ago

        An anthology-like mini series where each episode deals with one pilgrim and is written and directed by different people. As many different styles as there are pilgrims, just like how the book is written. Would translate very well to screen IMO.

    • psmgx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      Neuromancer has been optioned before but no one did anything with it. I think it was in play again but recently but haven’t heard much lately.

      Hyperion Cantos would be great.

      Gormanghast might also be cool.

    • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      Watch Inception and think of Neuromancer and you will find that its probably the best closest match for the way the story is told. So many things made me realize there are so many little “I loved that story but I cant make that movie so I will just give you clues”. The throwing star is the top.

  • ZeroGravitas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    29 days ago

    Old Man’s War by John Scalzi was made for this, I swear. His latest books also read a lot like movie scripts are contained therein.

    Charles Stross’ Laundry series has a ton of potential too, if less Chtullu is required, I wouldn’t mind a Merchant Princes series either.

    I heard rumours about Forever War being optioned at some point, but nothing came of it.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    29 days ago

    The Long Earth by Terry Pratchett and some guy who’s name is harder to remember.

    An inventor uploads a schematic to the Internet for a cheap, easy-to-assemble device that lets anyone (or almost anyone) “step” into parallel earths. A nearly infinite stretch of untamed wilderness sees people abandoning the polluted, crowded, government-run Old Earth in search of new opportunities. The catch: No iron or iron alloys can “step” across, sending these new earths back to the bronze age.

    Also: Zeppelins that are also reincarnated Buddhists that are also the first true machine intelligence; robot cats; libertarian communes; sapient nonhuman primates; sapient nonhuman non-primates; radioactive ziggurats; space programs to parallel moons; and grumpy survival chicks.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      29 days ago

      Stephen Baxter

      The premise was better than the execution, but I’ve definitely been curious if you could use the world stepping premise in an RPG in a compelling way.

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    28 days ago

    Sanderson’s Mistborn series could make some good film or TV. Honestly they could probably even pull off a whole cosmere MC universesque type thing… Although I think deals keep falling through because the author wants full creative control.

  • Orbituary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    29 days ago

    I would have loved Name of the Wind, but that lazy fuck Rothfuss is going the way of George Reorge Reorge Martin: he’s been promising book 3 for a decade and can’t finish it.

  • RabbitMix
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    29 days ago

    mass effect could be a huge tv and movie franchise but the designs of the aliens would make the effects budgets prohibitively expensive. damn would I love it though.

  • invertedspear@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    28 days ago

    I would love a true to the book series of World War Z. I’m not even sure anyone involved with that movie read the book. It should be a 3 season HBO series with an episode for each persons vignette. Intros and outros of each episode has the recurring reporter meeting the person and starting his recording as they launch into their narrative of what happened. If you need more episodes, just write additional vignettes. Season 1 is the events that lead up to the outbreak, season 2 is the war itself, season 3 is the aftermath. I’m pretty sure this is what Max Brooks was writing towards. It could be amazing.

    • OopsOverbombing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      28 days ago

      I’ve been saying this for years. It’s ideal for a series. Was terribly disappointed with that zombie movie that borrowed the name.

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    29 days ago

    The Dark Tower.

    Whatever that monstrosity they released a few years ago was doesn’t count.

  • norimee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    28 days ago

    You ask as if that was a good thing. Like an honor for a book. But I way too often find myself defending books with “It’s nothing like the movie. Don’t juge it by the awful movie.”

    Especially fantasy adaptions are regularly awful and damaging for the books.

    Examples: The Dark Tower, Eragon, Percy Jackson, The Giver, Inkheart.
    Netflix’s Persuasion, The Beach to name a couple of non fantasy as well.

    So I’d rather they leave the books alone and make original stories into movies.

    • ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      You said it better than i ever could. Starting at Jurassic Park, and going all the way to The Wheel of Time, just keep Hollywood away from my literature!

    • CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      After the Dark Tower movie came out, I heard a whole bunch of people on the internet saying that the movie was awful and the books are so much better. I didn’t see the movie, but if the books are so well-liked I thought I’d give them a try.

      I tried my best, I really did. But I just couldn’t finish the first book. It was just way too surreal and abstract for me.

      • norimee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        28 days ago

        You are not alone in this. The first book is awful. It made me doubt my english reading comprehension. Everybody hates it.

        It’s unfortunate, that such a great series starts off with the worst book, not only of the series, but imo of all of Kings books.
        Somehow the real story starts (for me) with the second book. The first is more of a world introduction, a world building tool. And otherwise quite irrelevant.

        I urge you, to give the second book (The drawing of the three) a chance. You won’t regret it, because if you disregard the first book, the series is fantastic.

        • CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          I generally prefer to start series from the very beginning so I don’t miss anything, but I think I’ll go pick up that second book and give the series another try.

          • norimee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            The second book begins with a kind of forword that summarises all relevant details of the first book.

      • ChoosyChooChoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        Try reading it alongside the podcast the KingSlingers. The podcast is set up where they read a couple chapters at a time, then spend a 2 hours talking about those chapters. One person read the series multiple times and the other is just reading it for the first time. I’m halfway through the series, and now I want them to break down and discuss every book I read.

  • ivanafterall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    28 days ago

    A well-done Brothers Karamazov could put your Downton Abbeys and Bridgertons to shame.

    Maybe call it “Three Brothers…”