• cron@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    147
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    After widening was completed in 2008, a portion of the highway west of Houston is now also believed to be the widest in the world, at 26 lanes when including feeders. - (Wikipedia)

    WTF

      • whou@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        58
        ·
        1 year ago

        “I SWEAR BRO JUST ONE MORE LANE, ONE MORE LANE WILL BE ENOUGH!!!”

        • darvocet@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          I e moved out of Houston but if i recall correctly they also removed the rail line that was adjacent to this highway for the expansion.

          There was a killer hamburger place off like Gessner that i still miss.

          • notacat@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is Houston aware that some cities pay hundreds of millions of dollars to install a rail line to address this exact problem?

            • njordomir@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              Disused rail lines are a RoW life raft for American cities. I cycle in a very hilly area and rail trails and trails along waterways have nicely mild grades compared to the rest of the state. Electric trams could easily co-exist with a cycle path next to them. I just hope we’re smart enough to recognize these chunks of land as a gift from the past and not give them up or develop them inappropriately (aka freeway expansions)

            • darvocet@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well that stretch of highway is called the “energy corridor” and all the big oil companies have their headquarters there… bp, chevron, conoco, etc.

              So to answer your question: No. they seem unaware.

          • cron@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            An old railway running along the north side of the freeway was demolished in 2002 in preparation for construction which began in 2004.

            Form the wiki article linked above

    • Thisisforfun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      That sounds like extremely bad planning. In essence they could have had several smaller highways that better suited the needs of the users without forcing them all onto this clusterfuck.

      • WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There’s already another highway 4 miles north and 4 miles south of it. There’s some 2-lane each way roads between, but anything bigger or more grade-separated would be further isolate communities, take away alternative transportation routes, and take away greenspace.

  • subunit317@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    1 year ago

    Houstonian of 30+ years here.

    Even with the insane number of lanes available, driving anywhere inside beltway 8 between like 12 pm and 8pm is hell on earth. And outside those hours, you’re playing chicken with drunk drivers.

    Before I started working remote, I used to clock my average speed to and from work. Most of the time it was 15-20mph on a 65mph freeway. Literally bicycle speeds. Without cars or gridlocked traffic, I could have commuted faster on a bike.

    More than one person dies in Houston traffic every day on average. This is probably the shittiest and most expensive form of mass transit mankind will ever build. At least I hope this is as bad as it ever gets, lol.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s absolutely insane how many people die every single day because we thought it was a good idea to let everyone operate multi-ton pieces of heavy machinery at hundreds of km per hour on the reg.

      How the fuck is there more regular testing and training for people driving forklifts than Dodge Rams?

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Last time I was in Houston I was driving in bumper-to-bumper traffic that was going 95 mph. I looked over to my right and saw a group of five cars pass me going at least 10 to 20 mph faster. This would not have been remarkable except that I was in the right lane and these cars were passing me on the shoulder.

      This being Houston, though, that’s still probably not remarkable.

        • subunit317@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately I don’t think that is a typo, lol. Death race is definitely how I would describe the I-45 Houston experience. If I’m not mistaken, the section of it that runs through Houston is actually one of the most dangerous stretches of road in the entire US. People absolutely tailgate at 90+ on that road.

      • subunit317@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Air quality (or rather the lack thereof) is a problem in parts of Houston. If you ever want to go down an internet rabbit hole, google the Houston cancer clusters. Or the Brio superfund (not superfun) site. I try not to think about it when I’m outside taking a walk 🫠

    • EatMyDick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Going 20 mph for any distance on a bike includes and assumption of good health, includes carrying a change of clothes, and shower which most workplace don’t offer.

      • subunit317@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is true, particularly in the brutal heat this summer. My mind just turns to selfish solutions when I’m stuck in bumper to bumper traffic.

        You would think that somewhere between the 10th and 26th lane of this urban hellscape, someone calling the shots would stop to ask “hey guys, y’all think maybe there’s a better way to do this?” But since this is 'murca, that guy probably got fired and replaced by some ex-executive of a company best known for its crimes against nature.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I live in a medium-sized city and I learned years ago that if you want to get anywhere on time, stay off the freeway. It’s not nearly as wide, but it has on ramps at shit intervals and the on ramps mostly give you no room to accelerate to highway speeds, so it’s always congested. I’m actually about to go a couple towns south as I write this and looking at GPS the freeway route which is the most direct will take 20 minutes longer than simply going through back country roads that add an addition 10 miles to the trip.

  • Aopen@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 year ago

    This will soon become top 100 most popular photos. Its synonymous with car dependency and post WWII American urban planning

  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How common/usable is subway in bigger cities? Here in Prague we have an amazing public transport, even with priority lanes for buses at some places and most importantly a pretty decent subway. I’ve never had an issue getting anywhere around the city in a short time (I can get anywhere in the city within 1.5 hour max (that is including suburbs around Prague), around 30 mins to places around the center), and the cost of an unlimited year-long ticket is just 150EUR.

    • GTG3000@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      Русский
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oil and automotive companies literally tore most of public transport out in US way back when.
      They would invest into the local tram companies, buy them out, then close and tear out the lines.

    • Rognaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Public transportation in the US is at best, an afterthought. A lot of major cities have buses/trolleys but not many have trains/subways. Only the largest cities have a workable public trans system such as New York, Chicago, San Francisco.

      • clanginator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And as someone who lives right outside SF, yes it’s one of the best cities for public transit in the US, but it can still take 2 hours to go somewhere that would take 30mins in a car.

        Not all the time - sometimes it’s just as fast as a car, but often enough that it’s a deterrent.

        And mind you, I live literally across the street from a train stop, so public transit is way more convenient for me than for most in the area.

      • grahamja@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        LA used to have one if the best trolley systems, then it got ripped out. It was the sub plot to who framed Roger Rabbit.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Portland is talking about eventually making its MAX Light Rail a cut-and-cover subway over the course of the next few decades. The system is suffering from the effects of decisions made in the 1970’s when the system was being created. At that point, it was limited to a stretch from the suburb of Gresham to downtown. Since then, that line has been extended to go to a completely different set of suburbs. So where a train being slowed down by downtown traffic was acceptable when that was the terminus, now that is unacceptable because it will affect many more stops.

        The light rail also has all four lines in the current system going over the Steel Bridge. In the event of the Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake, that aging bridge is predicted to crumble, crippling the system for years. It also acts as one of the chock points in the system. Currently that’s not the biggest bottleneck - that’s hiring drivers - but as system ridership recovers post-COVID it will become a problem for schedules again.

        A few things need to happen before Portland’s ready. First and foremost is simply having more people using the system. Right now the capital costs are prohibitive given the ridership. I think this will continue to improve over time. Portland has increasingly bad traffic and it’s only getting worse. Transit is often faster than going by car, depending on the trip. The city hasn’t had much stomach for expanding roads over the past few decades, so I think the main outlet will be transit.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the US, public transportation is pretty much unusable in bigger cities except for NYC.

      America has this weird, masochistic relationship with cars that just gridlocks everyone. But “FreEdoM.”

      • NotNotMike@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        One potential reason posited by The 1619 Project is due to white Americans moving out of metro areas after WW2 in order to “escape” black residents. Then, they restricted expansion of public transportation development to those areas because making them more accessible and usable would potentially result in a influx of poorer, black residents who can’t afford a car to commute to the suburbs.

        The specific example they used is Atlanta, which has staunch racial lines, horrible public transport, and some of the worst traffic in America. They make a very compelling case.

        Here is the relevant New York Times article about it and it’s Chapter 16 in the actual book

          • NotNotMike@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think definitely in downtown areas with a large night culture, but to a much lesser extent. The entire city center isn’t expensive, just the “hip” areas where the money is being spent. There are tons of poorer areas inside city limits that definitely have a lower cost of living compared to owning a house and a car

        • FuzzyDoublePumper@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Chicago is pretty expensive for public transportation. A monthly pass is $75 for the L and buses. A commute from the northern suburbs is $100 a month for Metra trains and an additional $30 per month for buses and the L. There are discounts for people that qualify.

          The price and the poor schedule to northern suburbs makes it unusable for me. It’s great for weekend trips to the city.

          • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            $130 is still a cost saving compared to gas, depreciation, and renting a parking space in town though, isn’t it?

            • FuzzyDoublePumper@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              For many people that’s true, especially if you don’t need the Metra pass. I’d consider it if the stops to my station were scheduled more often. The bar car is gone from the Metra, but they still allow alcohol so you can relax, have a drink, and listen to music.

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s my freedom to sit stuck on hot asphalt for hours at a time. Gridlock is real American freedom.

    • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s insanely bad. Hell, Canada has shown that public transit is viable with the North American development model, but the US simply refuses to invest money into public works.

      Vancouver SkyTrain and Montreal REM/Metro are both fast, highly efficient subway systems that are able to navigate single-family housing development. Why can’t the US?

      • nik282000@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Come to Toronto/The GTA, the lack of investment in public transit is on par with the rest of North America.

        • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          When I was in Toronto, the transit wasn’t great but it was at least better than Boston/Philadelphia…

    • 80085@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not many U.S. cities have a subway. I think the only substantial subway system is in NYC. The city I live in has a very short commuter rail line that doesn’t go to/from anywhere people want to go. Buses are gridlocked in traffic like everyone else, and have to make frequent stops, so it can take something like 2 hours to travel 10 miles. The low-wage workers I know without vehicles just spend $40/day on Uber to commute to work and back (which is a significant percentage of their pay).

      • Pipoca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        NYC is by far the best, but several other cities have fairly decent subways. Boston, DC, Chicago, and San Francisco have decent systems, although Chicago’s is an elevated train and Boston’s has had increasingly severe issues due to underfunding maintainence for decades.

    • ShortFuse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Building subterranean rail after the fact is just not feasible.

      Japan probably has the best rail system with JR East. To do that in the US, you would probably need to remove a lot of roads. I would welcome it, but I don’t know how the public would feel about losing roads to trains.

    • alvanrahimli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      unfortunately it is not the case for most of countries. For example, here, in Azerbaijan, rural public transport basically doesn’t exist, and in capital city - Baku - schedules, traffic, prices… They all suck. We only got underground metro, but as that is only sane transport, everyone uses it and on critic hours it also suck. Sadly.

      • MBM@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s to the opposite side of the city, I’m guessing every day travel would be somewhere around those 30 mins

      • Mikina@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That was an extreme, if I really need to get somwhere on the outskirts away from the subway. I don’t think I’ve ever had to travel for longer than 40 minutes in a long time, an average not counting work (which I have literally two tram stations near home) would be around 30 minutes. Definitely way faster than by a car.

  • Ironfist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    But you dont get it, managers need you at the office so they can feel important. You just need to lose 3 hours of your day, spend more money and pollute more, STOP BEING SELFISH!

  • Gnubyte@lemdit.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    That gave me a good chuckle.

    It’s odd how we’ve commoditized such selfishly resource hungry transportation. I like walking to stuff as long as where I live is safe.

  • m3m3lord@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is true. Commuting in an urban or suburban environment should be significantly easier than it currently is. Public infrastructure needs to improve and become less car-centric. That being said, if you live in a rural area or a small town where there is very little traffic, or if you need to pick up groceries for your family of 4+, cars are needed. People in anti-car communities do not like to hear this, but I do not think cars should be criticized for merely existing. Current infrastructure should be criticized for only considering them. I think that while holding on to the idea that car=bad is fun, it also sours people who genuinely rely on cars to the movement and limits what actual progress could be made by these communities to make walkable cities a reality. Thank you for listening to my ted talk.

    • Jefflix@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s extremely hard to nuance any conversation on any forum when multiple people interact. People almost always assume you’re pro or anti something. It’s also easier mentally to reject what doesn’t match your views.

      Debating on the internet is useless most times to convince the other party, but I’m sure some people reading it who haven’t made up their mind on the subject can appreciate a well put out idea and maybe consider it before making up their mind.

      • Screwthehole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My truck is used for hauling junk, supplies, tools, moving appliances etc. My job doesn’t work without a truck. Can’t get abandoned furniture to the dump on a bus. It is what it is.

    • Omodi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This seems like a straw-man criticism. I have never seen the anti-car communities attack people in rural areas for needing cars.

      • m3m3lord@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Staw-man involves making claims that something is ssying something it isn’t. Many of the posts I have seen and comments I have read suggest that the mere existence of cars is a problem. This is what I have a problem with because some people in rural areas, for example, need cars. I am not claiming that anti-car communities attack people in rural areas, rather, it can seem that way for those people.

    • sLLiK@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Changing to a different form of transportation, unless it involves teleportation, is just moving the problem somewhere else. It might be all electric, and it might get you there twice as fast, but you’re still just leveraging a tactic that moves the goalpost and delays the inevitable.

      Ultimately, there is no right answer to this. The greater the population, the greater the problem. If everyone who could work remotely started doing so, and the rest were afforded decentralized centers for the onsite labor they must do, this would be a more manageable problem. But eventually, we’d be back where we started - it’d just be a higher concentration of onsite workers generating all the traffic, and they might have less distance to travel.

      Coruscant’s traffic problems, or maybe 5th Element’s, are what we’re destined for.

      • m3m3lord@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Better solutions move the problem elsewhere? I’m moving the goalpost and delaying the inevitable? I have no idea what you are talking about.

  • BattleBeetle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still can’t get over how two lanes wide rail system can be more efficient than whatever I’m seeing now.

    • m3m3lord@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Key word is can be. If transportation planners are lazy enough to only build more lanes on the major highway, who’s to say they can build an efficient rail system. The major issue is a misallocation and a general lack of funding for transportation projects.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the transit doesn’t kill me first. For my personal situation, half of that course would be in highways with cars going at 80+ km/h.

          Luckily, I can and do take a bus instead of driving there, saves me so much stress and headache, not to mention that I can use the ~1h downtime to watch or read something

          • Bagofbuttholes@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I live about 45min outside of a major city. I’m also looking for my first career type job. We do have a train that goes into the city which my mother has taken for many years. The only way I’d be ok commuting in would be if I can take the train or a bus. Thinking of spending an extra 10hrs+ driving each week sounds so terrible. That’s 25% more hours each week that I don’t get paid and instead have to pay money. The only other way would be a hybrid schedule with only 2 days commuting per week.

            I actually get kind of excited to commute by train, I used to not have a car up in the twin cities and I read so much more having to take public transit. I would totally get a steam deck or ROG ally and finally get to play Hades and Hollow Knight.

            There are downsides though. Like if you want to go by the store or a friend’s on the way home you probably can’t. Also if you just miss your train, you might be waiting a long while. Lastly our train here is fairly dangerous and the nearest stop is in one of the most dangerous cities in the US.

            I wish biking was easier but where I live there is no way I could get into the city. Plus I used to bike to my first job, about 5 miles, and it sucks to get there and be sweaty. Guess with e bikes now that isn’t as big of a deal.

            • Shush@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I have a game that I always play on the road. Either I play it, or I sleep, if the day or the night before were rough. The fact that I can do either and chill until I get to work or home is fantastic. Where I live, the drive culture’s pretty bad and you always have to be hyper focused during the entire drive.

              Also, a part of my salary is calculated based on how far I am and how long it takes to commute. If I drive, the cost of fuel easily exceeds that part of the salary.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I did that until I got hit. I’m not willing to die to get to work.

      When I had an actual separated bike path, though, it was wonderful.

    • electriccars@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I drove 550 miles to another state for work travel, bringing an entire car load of work related stuff too. Doing that on a bike would be pretty hard…

      • Pipoca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        80% of the US lives in metropolitan and micropolitan areas. Most people work in the same metro or micropolitan area that they live in.

        Biking will never work for every trip for everyone. Public transit will never work for every trip. But it’s something that can work for many more trips, given better zoning & infrastructure. If you’re in a town, city or suburb, you shouldn’t need a car to buy milk or have a pint with friends.

        Getting most people out of cars is good for everyone. Cars lanes have much, much lower throughput than bus lanes or bike lanes do. Think about how much nicer driving is if you’re not stuck in traffic.

  • cobra89@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The answer is because local governments prioritized cars over streetcars and public transportation:

    The real problem was that once cars appeared on the road, they could drive on streetcar tracks — and the streetcars could no longer operate efficiently. “Once just 10 percent or so of people were driving, the tracks were so crowded that [the streetcars] weren’t making their schedules,” Norton says.

    • momentary@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      We used to have public street cars where I live that took people up and down the hill, but they sold out to a car company. I believe it lasted 2 years before the car company shut it down all together. Wild stuff!