@nostupidquestions When purchasing Music (£0.99 each) how many plays would you say made the purchase ‘worth it’?

  • Kaity@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 months ago

    0, I buy music to support the artist. The value is giving back to a musician so they can create more.

    • atx_aquarian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s a big motivation for me, too, but I’d say it’s about equally that I want archival of the best stuff for when rights holders pull their catalogs from the services I stream. I used to think that was mainly for the more obscure stuff, like local bands’ early albums that I can barely find anymore, but recently I’ve noticed albums missing from main services (Tidal and Spotify, in my case) for bigger acts, too.

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 months ago

    Depends on what you’re buying IMO. If you’re “buying” it in the sense of buying license to listen to it like with DRM like iTunes, nothing could make that worth it IMO. But if I’m buying physical media of the music itself (eg. Vinyl) then I’m usually willing to pay whatever the market price is for that album.

    • SamXavia@southampton.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      iTunes is DRM free, you can easily move the MP3 files to any device (even ones that have never had iCloud access).

      I don’t buy physical as I would wear it out playing the only track I would want to listen to on the album (as often it’s only 1-2 songs I am actually interested in.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        So why not just pirate it? When you buy digital music, only a miniscule fraction actually goes to the artist.

        • SamXavia@southampton.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Often Pirating can come with not only risk but also can be not the best quality out there, the easiest pirating method I know of getting music is finding the song on YouTube and that is defo not studio quality.

          I know not much will go to the artist but this is the best I can do without the money or ability to go to there shows and not enjoying Streaming Services.

          • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            the easiest pirating method I know of getting music is finding the song on YouTube and that is defo not studio quality.

            That’s the worst possible way to do it. You might as well try to hook up a tape recorder to the radio like my dad used to.

            There is literally no risk if you know what you’re doing, and you can get identical quality to what they sell. Go check out !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

            • Owl@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              There is literally no risk if you know what you’re doing

              if you know what you’re doing

              Which he says he doesn’t

          • randombullet@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            So pirate FLAC? There are so many FLAC files out there.

            YouTube is typically 128kbps AAC.

            If you want to bitch about quality, learn what actual quality is.

            At any rate, most downloaded Apple files are 256kbps AAC

  • seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I always hate these questions (is X worth it?) because you’re asking the Internet to give you an answer to a subjective question. If you want to sort out the answer for yourself it comes down to how much money you can afford to spend on entertainment and whether you think £1 of that amount for a song is worth it.

    If you’re rich and £1 doesn’t matter in slightest and you like the song then it’s “worth it.” If you’re poor and you have £20/wk to spend entertaining yourself then maybe not. Anyway who knows, if you think the song is worth the price then go for it.

    Also, just to throw this out there, there are an awful lot of ways to listen to music on the Internet that won’t cost you anything. You could always use one of those then later go back and buy music that’s particularly meaningful to you. Remember that streaming music pays the actual artists almost nothing, go buy physical media (or better yet go to one of their shows and buy merch) if you want your favorite artists to actually see any money.

    • SamXavia@southampton.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      So the reason I purchase songs digitally is a few reasons;

      1. Purchasing an album is really expensive
      2. Purchasing the album is stupid for me as I normally only like 1-2 songs on it.
      3. I’m really autistic and can’t deal with going to an artists shows
      4. I don’t like how Streaming services work taking money no matter how much I listen to the music
      5. Digital Media can be copied and saved
      6. I know I could just download the MP3 from YouTube but I like to pay something towards the work
      • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        These are all really good reasons to purchase digital media, but the comment above still has a great point that this is super subjective and we can’t answer for you. In the end, I echo their sentiment that “if you think the song is worth the price then go for it”.

    • Bangs42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Related, with so many free ways to listen to music, by the time I’m spending money on music I’ve already decided it’s worth it. Maybe I’ve listened to it a ton. Maybe the lyrics speak to me. Maybe it’s just a particularly well composed piece of music. Either way, I’ve made the valuation of it being worth it before I spend the money.

  • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    By the time I actually buy a song, I’ve been listening to it repeatedly at least 10 to 20 times. At that point I’m buying it to put in my offline library and the cost is worth it immediately. The £1 per song price hasn’t changed in a very long time. My music taste is very narrow, so I rarely find songs I like anyway. My entire music library amassed over my lifetime is 780 tracks currently (after removing some I lost interest in previously). So I definitely get my money’s with out of my music.

  • yessikg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    If I get to keep the music in mp3, flac, or some other file format? Even a single play is worth it

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why not listen first and then decide if it’s worth buying? Go listen to the songs for free on YouTube or other means. Then if you like it, buy it for any price you feel is fair. I do most of my music shopping on Bandcamp, you can listen to the songs there before buying. For older albums it isn’t uncommon the artists let you name your own price.

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I grew up in casette and CD era, so I use that for comparison. It’s a bit of a stretch, but it works for me:

    An album or cassette had roughly 10-20 songs and cost (in today’s inflation) roughly £5. Not all songs were bangers so I round it all to £0.5 per song.

    How many listens to be “worth it” I think is how much listen I would get out of it before I would happily buy a new one if it wore out or broke. So at least 50.

    At price of £0.99, I think a song is worth it at 100 listens.

    Though songs bought to support indie artists are worth it immediately. :)

    • weststadtgesicht@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      That means the answer to the question would be 2? After two plays you have about 6 minutes of entertainment which are worth $1.

      Btw I do the same entertainment budget calculations (as well as “what is my free time worth”)

    • netvor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      $10/hour entertainment budget

      So… worst case you spend $87,600 per year? (assuming you want to be entertained during sleep as well…)

  • Selyle
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I could be super wrong, but I don’t think people who purchase music think about the value of those songs in that way anymore. Some people buy songs for the physical display of the package, the potentially higher quality playback, to avoid music from disappearing due to copyright or label issues, to support an artist since streaming is like fractions of a penny, for offline listening which isn’t tied to a subscription feature, just for collections sake, for more emotional reasons - physically connecting with a song/album, to justify their recent impulse record player purchase, etc. Sometimes people just want to spend money (retail therapy), so they’ll buy an album (digital or physical), never open it, and just keep streaming.

    • SamXavia@southampton.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      That is fair enough, I purchase Digitally as it’s cheaper (as not really interested in a full album) and the higher quality of music does help a bit as it means I can hear it on better quality kit and it still sounds amazing. Streaming isn’t really a thing I enjoy as some months I may not want a new song or even want to listen to music, So i’m triyng to work out what amount of plays makes sense that you’ve ‘got worth’ out of it. I know it’s a little subjective but I wonder how much 99p is worth

  • normalexit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I usually do some goofy math like cost / uses. The first time I used a $300 washing machine I considered that a $300+ load of laundry, next time we’re down to $150, and so on.

    For a song I’d probably at least want a few dozen plays out of it for $1, although nowadays everyone just subscribes and streams.

    • SamXavia@southampton.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I personally avoid streaming services as I know some months I rather just listen to podcasts or just not listen to music at all. This is why I’m starting a digital library of songs that I purchase. But yeah I guess getting a song to less than 0.01 per play would be a good goal to see the value in the purchase.

  • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    The question isn’t how many play, but how many song does your plbylist have.

    If you pay Spotify/deezer 9.99 a month this is phe price of 10 song a month. After 5 years it’s a 600 songs play list.

    If your plbylist aren’t that big, it’s a loss, if your playlists are bigger, it’s a win

    • SamXavia@southampton.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Some months I listen to no music at all, as other months it’s not normally more than a few songs I listen to on repeat, obviously my playlists grow but not at 10 songs a month all year around. Also music streaming services are more closer to 14.99 in my country than 9.99

  • Acidbath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I genuinely think that you should listen it as many times until you can hum or mentally sing along with it… if this makes any sense. Like if you are able to associate the song’s title a melody then it’s “worth it”. For me(I’m not even kidding), this is probably after playing it 4-5 times on repeat.

    • SamXavia@southampton.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I know i’ve got a few songs that I’ve got over 10 listens to, and I think a good goal for each track might be 1 play per pence that I spent on it, so a £0.99 song would be 99 plays.

  • LordGimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    You don’t “buy” music. You buy a license to listen to that music for as long as the license issuer still owns that particular song.

    So never. Pirating music is the only path to ownership.

    • Kelly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      You don’t “buy” music. You buy a license to listen to that music for as long as the license issuer still owns that particular song.

      Unless dealing with the artist or studio directly the license issuer also won’t “own” the song but rather have a license to sell and distribute the title.

  • netvor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I have lots of music which I got basically for free, and a lots of music for which I paid.

    My general attitude towards music is that I’m in it to explore, learn and enjoy the indescribable human connection that I get through, and only through listening to someone’s little “message in a bottle”. Doing this for many years (I’m 44 so over 30 years now) I’ve learned that training my brain on multiple styles and genres, the connection can always get deeper and more rich.

    So I would not be able to ever say a purchase was not worth it, because I would always assume such decision to be rushed. I had too many experiences when I listened to something, didn’t quite like it, but later I somehow “grew into” it, and then I learned to love it for years and years.

    Different music ends up playing different roles in my life. Some albums end up teaching me a genre or a style, some end up acting like a gateway drug, some end up as a “stand in” for whole genre. Some end up as “holy relics” of who I was, and are re-visited from time to time to see whether I’ve changed and how. Some end up on a shelf and get re-discovered, some end up on a shelf forever.

    (That “stand in” part is kinda tongue-in-cheek, but it sometimes almost works; eg. I would never set out to get a Dub album, but Dub Guerilla is one of the 100 best things I’ve ever heard, and it’s just so darn satisfying that it satisfies all and any of my Dub needs.)

    Sometimes my brain can be just really petty about things, like completely disregarding an album because of a track or a section which I feel is a mistake. Sometimes I just know I will need much more time, sometimes I feel certain things might remain hard to get into maybe forever.

    Don’t get me wrong, somewhere among those piles, there are really things that I won’t ever care to pick up, and perhaps would not purchase them again, but it almost never has much to do with number of listens. It might be things that I just got with bad expectation (ie. not listening upfront) or things that I enjoyed because of content (eg. lyrics) but I have changed and moved on.

    Other times music is best experienced live, for some bands the “spirit” simply cannot be tamed, let alone reproduced. Sometimes I get album from band directly after a show and then end up never feeling it again from the CD, but then again, I would say it was not worth it, because it’s still a great way to “tip” the artist, and sometimes it will just work out.

    (A bit more related to the OP: Incidentally, just today I broke my all-time record by spending about 20 EUR for V​í​n by Janus Rasmussen, and for reasons completely unrelated to OP and the price (but related to a sub-thread) I also did something I would never do normally–put one of the tracks on repeat for several hours. That’s not to brag about money–it’s just funny how it ended up accidentally as “$ per listen” experiment, although )