In a well-intentioned yet dangerous move to fight online fraud, France is on the verge of forcing browsers to create a dystopian technical capability. Article 6 (para II and III) of the SREN Bill would force browser providers to create the means to mandatorily block websites present on a government provided list.

I don’t agree that it’s “well-intentioned” at all but the article goes on to point out the potential for abuse by copyright holders.

cross-posted from: https://radiation.party/post/64123

[ comments | sourced from HackerNews ]

    • ThetaDev@lemmy.fmhy.netEnglish
      13·
      1 year ago

      No, I thought “Cheese Pizza” ist just an acronym for inappropriate pictures and videos of children. Tell me if I’m mistaken (English is not my first language).

      • Jck2905@beehaw.orgEnglish
        8·
        1 year ago

        Nah you are good. Cheese pizza as an acronym for you know what has been around longer than pizza gate.

      • Kilgore Trout@feddit.itEnglish
        3·
        1 year ago

        I guess it’s a joke on the fact that the US have a passion for acronyms: that inappropriate material is referred to as CP, nowadays even as CSAM.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]English
        1·
        1 year ago

        Sorta. In the aughts, Cheese Pizza was a code for child porn among those who didn’t want interested parties (e.g. the NSA <waves> ) picking up the conversation during their normal webcrawling. Of course, since then, they caught on.

        These days, the term is CSAM (Child Sex Assault Material) when discussed by those who see it as a problem (e.g. law enforcement and people who discuss the science of content moderation). It comes up frequently, because every time some politician or billionaire decides they’re going to start their own free speech social media platform ( With blackjack! And hookers! ) One of the phases they have to go through is trolls (and others) posting CSAM without it getting taken down right away.

        A more complex issue is what counts as CSAM and what doesn’t (examples of controversies include the Napalm Girl picture of Phan Thi Kim Phuc, The Little Mermaid sculpture in Copenhagen and porn featuring The Simpsons family), and there is no consistent standard that applies to all social media platforms, but as laws are defined, the county, state and nation in which the platform is being used. Denmark is obviously fine with the mermaid statue, but some places are not.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]English
      4·
      1 year ago

      Maybe you weren’t around long enough to appreciate the war on terror during which the George W. Bush administration and the very right wing Congress and SCOTUS all had fantasies about locking down the internet and making sure no one could think terror thoughts without the DHS knowing.

      And while we’re at it, kill that porn bugbear, for the children, of course.

      Then they realized qucikly enough that the only thing netizens love more than porn is cat pics (seriously. We measured.) and all we’d do by criminalizing unregulated internet traffic is make criminals of everyone in the US.

      And who would be right there to teach everyone about net privacy and how to keep all your transactions hidden? Terrorists. Child porn enthusiasts. Communists. Also the whole black market where you can buy children and bomb parts. Also thr encryption / privacy community that occupies every LUG across the world.