• SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I think there is a very fine line between prescribing language because of a world view that insists on conformity, and correcting grammer and vocabulary because being clear and understood is kinda the point of language.

    • SkyeStarfall
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I don’t think it’s that hard, the line is mainly “is this hard to understand?” If yes then correcting or discussing it is not prescriptivism, if no, then you’re just being pedantic

      Just take texting or internet comments for example, how many are missing punctuation? How many are using slang terms or shortenings of words? How many are straight up omitting/skipping words? How many are making liberal use of language to either express themselves or have some emotional impact? Or just don’t put in the effort to do grammar

      After all, I miss punctuation in this very comment as well, especially at the end of paragraphs, in addition to skipping words or making liberal use of language like “do grammar”. Is that grammatically correct? Absolutely not, but you understand what I mean

      Assuming informal communication, of course. Formal communication is more about being proper, and ties into cultural norms of formality etc

      • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 months ago

        “Hard to understand?” Is a question more complex than it might appear on the surface. There are obvious examples of ambiguity in speech which lead to complete misunderstanding.

        But “hard to understand?” may also satisfy the criteria of “effort to understand”. Just because a message was understood does not mean the audience was able to hear it effortlessly. And that boils down to consideration.

        It’s a two way street. Correcting mistakes because of apparent lack of effort is probably not warranted, but a speaker is not entitled to a happy audience either

        As with many online feuds, I think a lot of these problems typically arise because of a lack of operating under the assumption others are acting in good faith.

        • SkyeStarfall
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          If course, ultimately language is about (efficient) communication. And as long as that is satisfied, grammar is secondary. Like if there is ambiguity, asking for clarification is very much not pedantic

          There is of course some nuance and leeway, but I still think it’s fairly obvious where the line goes

          But ultimately, yes, language is nuanced and constantly evolving, it’s very neat though

          • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            See, I could understand you just find despite you writing “If course”, but if you try to say to me that is not a mistake simply because I could understand you, I cannot at all agree with your logic of what makes it the language “correct”.

            • SkyeStarfall
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              I never said it makes the language “correct”, more that language is fluid and there’s no need to correct people

              Unless a typo or spelling mistake is so common it becomes widely used, it’s fair to say it’s just a mistake

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        I agree completely and have nothing to add, but I felt compelled to put my username under both of yours.

      • thurmite@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I know this is, like, counter to your argument, which I fully agree with, but… I am triggered by the lack of periods at the end of your paragraphs.

        • SkyeStarfall
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          However, when you put periods at the end of stuff like text messages, it sounds almost passive aggressive, doesn’t it?

          It’s the difference between

          “Okay”

          And

          “Okay.”

  • luciole (he/him)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 months ago

    Prescriptivists: don’t use that word, it’s not in the Dictionary. It doesn’t exist.

    People working for Dictionary: new words? Yeah we pick whatever people say or write.

    • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oxford English Dictionary: -adds a slang term or portmanteau in common use for years by millions of people in order to reflect the linguistic zeitgeist-

      Prescriptivists: 🤬NO🤬SLANG🤬IN🤬DICTIONARY🤬

      Prescriptivists from the 1800s: 🤬NO🤬USING🤬"ZEITGEIST"🤬OUTSIDE🤬PHILOSOPHY🤬

  • Default_Defect@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah, but loose instead of lose and too in place of to is annoying. As well as using apostrophe’s on word’s that end in S’s that aren’t possessive.

  • beefbot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Upvote for the perscurptivist spelling, lawl