Meldrik@lemmy.wtfM to Facepalm@lemmy.wtf · 4 months agoUsing stock photos as intended? LMFAOOOlemmy.wtfimagemessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1697
arrow-up1697imageUsing stock photos as intended? LMFAOOOlemmy.wtfMeldrik@lemmy.wtfM to Facepalm@lemmy.wtf · 4 months agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squaredrunkpostdisaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·4 months agoTo be fair I would have expected a tiny bit more effort.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up34·4 months agoFor the poster? Nah. They’re right, that’s what stock photos are for. What, you want them to whip up a unique CGI model for no discernable improvement in quality in a still picture?
minus-squareChadus_Maximus@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 months agoNo. I want them to photograph real sharks. No CGI.
minus-squareMacStache@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·4 months agoGood news! Someone already did and is selling that photo in stock photo services!
To be fair I would have expected a tiny bit more effort.
For the poster? Nah. They’re right, that’s what stock photos are for. What, you want them to whip up a unique CGI model for no discernable improvement in quality in a still picture?
No. I want them to photograph real sharks. No CGI.
Good news! Someone already did and is selling that photo in stock photo services!