The GOP is scrambling to find a line of attack against Kamala Harris’s VP pick — and it’s not going well

Tim Walz has made his debut as Kamala Harris’ running mate, and Republicans are struggling to apply their standard villainization playbook to the Minnesota governor.

Walz has been making waves for weeks now as a good-natured, relatable politician with a particular aptitude for dressing down the Republican agenda in terms that any voter can understand — and the GOP hates it.

Republicans are scrambling to paint the governor-turned-VP candidate as a devilish Marxist hellbent on running the country into the ground — their usual stuff — while leveling a bunch of other really weird attacks. Here are some of their most pathetic attempts to turn voters against Walz.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    253
    ·
    3 months ago

    LOL if “he gives away tampons” is the only thing you can find to criticize about your opponent, then you’re in pretty deep fucking shit

    • CountVon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      165
      ·
      3 months ago

      Bet they wanted a Shapiro VP pick so bad. It would’ve been antisemitic space laser conspiracy theory bullshit 24/7 until the vote. Now all they’ve got is “how dare this man ensure school children have full bellies and necessary sanitary supplies every day.”

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        95
        ·
        3 months ago

        as it turns out, the strategy of “lets force everyone to have more babies, and then when kids go hungry, blame the parents specifically for having too many babies” isn’t panning out the way they hoped

        • CountVon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          74
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’ve always felt that “have more babies but also fuck you for ever having sex” was a bit of wildly contradictory policy stance.

      • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 months ago

        But hey, now they can claim that not picking Shapiro was antisemitic! 🙄

        Never mind the tiki torches and chants of “Jews will not replace us” in the distance…

          • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            3 months ago

            You would think so, but I’ve heard it on talk radio already. Verbatim: “Harris didn’t pick Shapiro because Democrats hate Jews!”

            Uh, there’s one major party that is so hard-up for votes that they now welcome neo-Nazis to their convention, and it’s not the Democrats…

            • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              3 months ago

              I mean, I’ve also heard them parrot Russian propaganda that Zelensky is a nazi despite being, you know, jewish. Logic doesn’t really enter their minds.

            • samus12345@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yes, Harris, whose husband is Jewish, hates Jews.

              I know reality means nothing to them, but it makes their floundering all the more funny.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            They call Bernie Sanders antisemitic. Factual reality is absolutely irrelevant to the shit spewing from their mouths.

    • dactylotheca@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      3 months ago

      Conservatives don’t give a shit about what’s actually getting criticized – if they’re told that they need to think Walz is bad, then anything he does can be used as an example of him being a “villain”. Could be fucking “he donates to charity” and they’d find a way to doublethink that into being a bad thing

      • kinsnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        True, but if only the deep maga cultists are buying your attacks, then it is not changing the election result

        The goal of the attacks is either to motivate some kind-of-conservative that doesn’t care that much about the election and might not vote to vote; or to demoralize a democrat voter into not voting

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        In this case, it’s not landing because they were already being called weird for similar behavior, and that is landing. It’s easy to dismiss the entire attack with a deadpan “that’s a weird thing to say”.

    • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      3 months ago

      Holy shit. They’re struggling to find stuff so they default to “he put tampons in schools”, “let Minneapolis burn to the ground” (which it didn’t, I lived downtown during the protests) or “rocks and cows” quote.

      That’s about it.

      • iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, that was weird how they kept on telling me the city had burned down and shit when I could turn my head 90° and see the skyline same as it ever was, nary a cloud or indeed plume of smoke in the sky

        • Vladkar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          3 months ago

          Luckily we have Fox News and random strangers on the internet who are willing to magnanimously inform us about the desolation of our own city.

          Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to go scavenge for hot dish in the smouldering ruins of Saint Paul.

        • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          Exactly. And I love how they got the whole burning down thing from main stream media that they bitch so much about.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        I lived downtown during the protests

        So how’s the ghost life treating you?

        • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 months ago

          I believe he was talking about a political map and how the state was a lot of red counties/ Land area and he said something like, "there’s not a lot of people there. It’s mostly rocks and cows. "

        • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 months ago

          At one point when he was talking about voting districts. He had referred to red districts as “mostly rocks and cows”. And well… Rural conservatives took offense to it like they do for everything. I still see billboards with that quote when I’m in the middle of nowhere.

      • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Didn’t you know tampons ruin a young girls ‘purity?’

        I’m sad to say that’s probably why conservatives are upset about it. They probably still think you can lose your virginity to a tampon…

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      I say we all give away tampons. At least we’re not wearing them on our ears

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Seems like the GOP are doing everything else to alienate the votes of women. That criticism from them wouldn’t surprise me in the least.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    ·
    3 months ago

    I love the contrast this is painting between the far-left and far-right. On the one hand, you got fascists carrying tiki torches and chanting “jews will not replace us,” and on the other you got people saying “let’s make sure no children are starving.” And talking heads on Fox are super pissed about the latter.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      137
      ·
      3 months ago

      To be clear neither Harris or Walz are “far left”…

      This is what actual moderates looked like.

      I’m happy to have them, but we lose if we call what they’re doing “far left”.

      We desperately need to bring the Overton Window back where it should be.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        3 months ago

        To be clear neither Harris or Walz are “far left”…

        Policies that were considered centrist compromise planks back in the 70s and 80s are now “Fringe Leftist Views” in the modern media, because so much of our information is owned and manufactured by right wing extremists.

        • teamevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Who love to scream that the liberal media isn’t right enough… the right is the absolute scum of the earth, they can shove their Fuck you I got mine attitude right up their ass

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh, only the Wrong Wing calls them far left. Normal people know better. For one thing, they have a chance of being elected.

        • ceenote@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s what I’m saying. Right wing talking heads are priming people to start thinking “The far left doesn’t seem so bad.”

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Normal people know better.

          We’ll see. I suspect we’re going to get a full-court press against Walz, particularly after the DC media circuit was shilling so hard for Shapiro and didn’t get what they wanted.

          He’s going to get the same tarring and feathering as the Sanders campaign did, back in 2020, after Chris Matthews nearly had a heart attack on air when Bernie won Nevada.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        As far as I understand, far left is anti-capitalism (communism), and/or anti-authority (anarchism), and/or maybe more recently radical ecologists who are ready to destroy property.

  • Otakulad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well yeah. I mean look at this man. Free breakfast AND lunch. Sounds like the devil’s work to me. You have to be a good Christian like Sarah Huckabee and remove child labor laws.

    I mean, who hugs kids like this anyway?

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      The kids in the top one are so excited about their newfound Freedom™ to toil away in the mines.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Look at those kids. They’re wearing little suits and have right-wing political connections. Those kids are going to be running the mines.

    • fadingembers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah obviously those kids should be picking themselves up by their boot straps. Sorry kids there’s no such thing as a free lunch /s

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      86
      ·
      3 months ago

      The original image is so much better. No need to add a dipshit, just the VP nominee with a baby pig.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t like the whole “down to earth politician I could get a beer with” thing, but I legitimately don’t think I can picture trump or vance looking happy with a farm animal, and I think that says something about them as peoplecin a way that’s different than just “down to earth”.

        You should look like that if you’re at a fair and someone hands you a piglet. It’s just a funny, cute thing that’s supposed to make people happy.

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            3 months ago

            If we were in a novel or a movie the critics would have called that symbolism too heavy-handed. Of course they also would have said it is too unrealistic to have millions of dimwits voting for a con man because they are all racist.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think the range of clothing I can picture them in is suit or golf polo. They just exude the energy of rich boys who don’t want to do anything “beneath their station”.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              3 months ago

              Vance probably has as he was in the military. Even a cushy press job has to make his own bed. But I’m sure he’s put that all behind him and now thinks of that as work for the servants.

        • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 months ago

          The “get a beer with” thing is about trust and being comfortable. Sounds like, “handing him a piglet” is your version of this. His reaction makes you trust and be comfortable with him as a decent human.

          I vote, you now use the phrase, “I’d hand that guy a piglet.” And make it your own.

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Makes a lot of sense when you put it like that. :)

            I felt funny about it because I don’t generally need my politicians to be “down to earth” because exceptional people are often not and that’s fine, but I do need them to have that human joy of a baby animal, even if they’re not a pet owner or anything.

            Definitely appreciate the insight that it’s related, but different qualities being desired. :). Definitely going to use that phrase now.

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          Trump couldn’t pull off holding a book for fuck’s sake. And this guy, he’s just charming. He’s a big lovable oaf.

    • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      how long before the inevitable “national guard isn’t real army men!!!” talking point is flying around?

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        You see, Republicans saying that exact thing would’ve been smart. It’s both true (as an acronym for his rank), but also dangerously close to “CSAM” that idiots would be up in arms about the guy being a predator.

        Still would be an incredibly scummy thing to do to attack opponents, but that might have actually achieved something for those amoral fuckwits.

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    3 months ago

    Watched a video of him explaining how to fix a headlight connector and immediately know he is my man. Dude didn’t need to explain to the world how to do it. He wanted to help us, in his own little way.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I don’t think they’ll struggle to attack him, it’s just a question of whether it will stick and how much it will matter since he’s only the VP pick. In some ways it’s useful because it distracted them from Harris.

    The attacks seem pretty obvious: he’s a pedophile, he eats babies, Minneapolis burned under his watch, he retired from the national guard to avoid combat, he supported LGBTQ groups in high schools, he lived in China, he facilitated sending children to China, say China a lot, say Marxist a lot, say communist a lot, highlight Bernie and Hillary’s support of him, etc.

    Remember, they only need to villainize him to people that already think he’s a villain, so nothing needs to be true or especially devastating. It’s like the Fox cut-down that people responded to by being like “the reasons Fox says he’s bad are all the reasons I like him!”

    It’s like, well, yes. Fox isn’t trying to convince you. They’re trying to make sure republican voters don’t stay home.

    Edit: oh, and tampons, I forgot they were attacking him about tampons.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      This doesn’t make sense to me. They need to villainize him for those low info voters on the fence of voting. Most Republicans are voting for Trump, not against Kamala.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Their problem is they want to energize their base to vote while not encouraging a wider turnout. That’s the point of attacks, not to change opinions. Unfortunately for them, their attacks end up energizing their opponents base because they’re so fucking stupid or actually pointing out things the opponents base wants.

        “Kamala picks the vp endorsed by Sanders. This Democratic ticket is a horrible vehicle for progressive change that we must stop.” That’s the sort of attack that actually helps your opponent. If they let Kamala’s campaign paint them as both radical and not looking for real change, they’re cooked. And so far that’s what they’re doing.

  • EvilBit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 months ago

    Believability is the nemesis of the GOP this cycle.

    Walz is a villain? Not believable

    Vance fucked a couch? Believable

    Trump took illegal funds from Egypt? So believable

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 months ago

    If Jesus were her running mate they’d find some way to double down on ‘Democrats bad’ by making a new hyper Christianity that’s even more theocratic and fascist.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Also Republicans: screaming themselves hoarse about an Algerian woman boxer.

    The weird get weirder and I’m loving this VP pick. What a 180 from just a few weeks ago, when a lot of us thought the Democrats were just going to march into a very likely loss with Biden as the nominee…most people now laugh when JD is the topic and a couch reference is made and the Republicans are proving themselves to a bunch of creepy weirdos on the daily.

  • ChadCMulligan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 months ago

    Dude is so likable and squeaky clean seeming that it makes me worry his crawlspace is full of human remains or something

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 months ago

    NPR broke the news about the Walz endorsement this morning by interviewing a bunch of Republicans from his original House district.

    Everyone in the DC news circuit was furiously insisting that Shapiro had to be the guy and Harris didn’t listen. So now expect this guy to get absolutely dragged in the press for the next three months.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just had a conversation with someone about it… apparently he thinks that the reason she went with walz over Shapiro is that Shapiro tried to negotiate roles/responsibilities where Walz was like “what can I do?”

      Don’t know if that’s just a rumor or fairly accurate, so don’t quote me on that.

      In the paper world that is the DC circuit, Shapiro might have been the “smart” choice of political wonks.

      In the real where people actually live… Walz makes more sense.

      Really, the thing is that Shapiro might have helped deliver PA, where the effect Walz is having is immediate and obvious- he’s bringing a certain kind of optimism, joy, and grit.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 months ago

        NYT says that an insider told them the Shapiro thing. To summarize, Shapiro wanted to know his responsibilities and how they’d share the leadership, etc. Walz by contrast asked how he can help and told Harris not to pick him if he won’t strengthen her chance of winning.

        Ultimately, Harris told the source after the Walz interview that she liked him a lot. And to be fair, her team told her after multiple focus groups and everything that all three final choices would have a path to winning so she went with her gut. Plus, research they had suggested that Kelly nor Shapiro would guarantee their states, anyway.

        The article does suggest that this won’t be the last we hear of Shapiro as he does have higher ambitions.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          The article does suggest that this won’t be the last we hear of Shapiro as he does have higher ambitions.

          given what he said in Philly, I wouldn’t be surprised to find he’s not on the cabinet or something.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    it’s hard to paint someone as a villain when you’re literally supporting donald trump.