• sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Housing (homes and apartments) is either in yet another bubble, or I guess just going to permanently remain absurdly high, slowly filtering more and more people into homelessness and death.

      EDIT: (derp i fucked it up, EDIT 2)

      Average rent vs median wage, cpi adjusted, and indexed to 1982 = 100.

      https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1raP7

      (Basic take away: the average real rent is about 4.2x or 420% what it was in 1982 whereas the median real wage has only risen by about 1.2x or 20%)

      Edit 3: I would do median rent vs median wage, but FRED does not appear to track median rent.

      Personal debt levels are astoundingly bad EDIT: If you do not own a house. The average US renter credit score is 638, and most places won’t even consider you if it is below 620.

      https://www.investopedia.com/do-you-need-credit-to-rent-apartment-8600564

      … a study from Rent Cafe found that the average credit score of renters in the U.S. was 638 in 2020 (the most recent data available),…

      The medical system remains ruinously expensive and corrupt.

      The proportion of those who are not counted as unemployed, but who are not working, climbs higher and higher. is lowering, but still has not recovered to Pre-Covid levels, much less abated its general downward trend since the 90s.

      (Labor Force Participation Rate).

      https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=1raRG

      College costs climb further and further, offering less and less likelihood of an actual decent paying job.

      Wealth inequality is the worst in the known economic history of the world.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        2 months ago

        In 2/3 of the US states it’s still legal to pay someone $7 an hour.

        5.1% of $7 an hour is 35 cents.

        Don’t spend it all in one place, I guess.

        • BossDj@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Less than 2% of the population is making minimum wage. Median income is more than double minimum wage. Even in rural areas

          I agree it’s not enough, should be raised and all that, but it’s not the reality (because that number is so ridiculous)

          • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I agree it’s not enough

            shrugs

            5.1% of $14 is 70 cents an hour. $28 bucks a week.

            Don’t spend it all in one place.

            This economy is objectively atrocious for working people. I’m glad we can connect on the fact that it is most definitely not enough.

              • capital@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                You get that a lot on Lemmy in regards to these topics.

                They really don’t like it when you compare them to conservatives denying covid.

                Anecdotal evidence is trash except when it’s their anecdotes. Then it’s second to none.

              • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                On wages, exactly.

                A small percent of a poverty wage is objectively worth criticism, if we’re putting it nicely. If we want to talk in percentages, you’d need a 400% increase on the minimum wage in Mississippi to get to a living wage.

                That’s why I’m criticizing this reply.

                • BossDj@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Sorry but I’m criticizing your initial reply to the fact that wage increases are statistically high. Yes, 70 cents raise is a lot for a grocery worker. And it’s especially important, as OP said, when compared to the rest of the world US is rising faster.

                  The “2/3 of states” reply, while factual, was misleading as well as tangential to the original point you were replying to.

                  Idealism has an important place, but not when it results in pure cynicism

                • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  And you will keep being a pedant about it and just ignore that those extra pennies, just like the 5.1% referenced earlier in the thread, don’t add up to anything when you’re not being paid a living wage to begin with.

                  What I don’t understand is why you’re angrier with me than you are at Democrats and Republicans.

          • DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            More than double is still woefully inadequate. A study from over a decade ago showed that people need to make an average of $75,000 a year to get by in America, it’s more now.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s going well for anyone making capital gains. It sucks for anyone else earning a fucking wage.

  • KyuubiNoKitsune
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, corporations are doing great, the “economy” is a good indication of that, but it means fuck all for us.

      • APassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m ready for progressive Roosevelt-types and I’m voting as hard as I can to get them. I’ll take Teddy, I’ll take FDR, I’ll take Eleanor.

        I just want someone scrappy enough to succeed on our behalf.

        • Icalasari@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          I just want things to hurry up and get to the stage where rich investors start jumping from windows again because even the stock market can’t hide shit anymore

          • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I don’t think we’ll see that again, at least not voluntarily. A crash of that magnitude almost happened in 2008, but the corporate owned government bailed out the failed businesses. And now, the owner class is even more heavily invested in real estate, so even if the stock market tanks, having a captive market on a human right means they always have a way to steal from the workers.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 month ago

    because it doesnt matter how great the economy is, because only the rich and businesses benefit from it.

    Meanwhile us peasant folk are still struggling to buy overpriced essentials and afford the worst, most unsuitable, barely qualifying roofs over our heads.

  • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s almost like the word has a different meaning on Wall Street than it does for the average person!

  • b161
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Economic growth” = rich people’s yacht money

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It doesn’t matter that the economy is growing if it isn’t lifting up your life as well. Hundreds of millions of people still live in US states where it’s legal to pay $7 an hour. (2/3 of them) All of us are dealing with rampant inflation and crippling costs for utilities, housing, and food.

    The government’s position on this is that the Biden Administration has created 16,000,000 jobs, and while that may be true, I’d wager my savings that most of those are second and third jobs, because it’s become impossible to live with just one in the United States of America.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s a really depressing statistic. I wish we could get everyone under 40 to vote differently, but I don’t think we can.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m always really disturbed when I see how much value and assets and savings I am supposed to have…

        Like depressed too but really fucking disturbed that neither I nor basically anyone I know except once rich kid who his parents paid for everything while he got a $200,000 a year coding job have any legitimate savings or plans to be able to grow it.

        And it’s not like I haven’t been working for the last 2 decades since I was 14.

    • APassenger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d wager my savings that most of those are second and third jobs, because it’s become impossible to live with just one in the United States of America.

      I’ve wondered this as well - and wondered if Biden ever really grokked what’s happening. Hopefully others do and they follow through once they win (if they do).

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Biden ever really grokked what’s happening

        I don’t think anyone at the federal does. If they do, they simply don’t care, judging by their actions.

        We’re about to hit 20 years of the minimum wage being $7 at the federal level, across three administrations, two of which were Democratic with control of Congress. I expect more of the same no matter who we elect in the fall.

  • bobthened@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Because the measures that economists use to measure the economy are not relevant to regular people. GDP tells you nothing about living standards.

    • xenoclast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Only getting better for the ultra wealthy. That’s what the system is for and it’s working better than it ever has.

      If you think about. When capitalism is less capitalist is when regular people benefit. (Regulation, healthcare, free education)

      Socialist American policies were the best.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’d say even for the wealthy, their living standards aren’t getting better. At their level of wealth, getting more either means number in accounts goes up if they are passive with it or power over others goes up if they are active with it.

        But yeah, capitalism is for those with capital; it’s right in the name.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yep. Just reading the title, the “economy” is up, and people are worse for it.

    The fact is, despite record breaking profit, nearly none of that “growth” is being provided to the people creating the value for companies to sell, and is instead being handed upwards to people with more money than brains, who have “invested” in the business.

    The lines on the stock market graphs go up, and the people working for that company who create all the things that are generating the profit, are robbed, and their would-be wages are handed to the shareholders.

    Is anyone shocked by this? Is anyone surprised by this?

    Did anyone not know this already?

    What a stupid article.

    • ZMonster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I work with people that really struggle to grasp this concept. I work rotations and every hitch I find myself spending the first few days explaining that what they call “the economy” I would call the CPI, whereas what capitalists refer to is corporate profits - and never the twain shall meet. But this is yet another complexity that the right benefits from obscuring, and complexity requires thoughtful consideration for understanding. I realize I’m asking a lot from a bunch of blue collar rubes.

    • Fox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Part of it is that when people say the “economy” is up, they’re usually only referring to valuations of public companies which is only part of the picture. The price-to-earnings ratio is so wack right now that many companies are trading at 18x their earnings per share, so while profits may be up, the companies are still wildly overvalued compared to their expected output.

      Real wage growth has lagged significantly compared to the historical trend. If the labor market continues to take a beating, consumer spending will tank and bring equities down with it.

  • archchan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    That “economic growth” is for the benefit of capital owners at the expense of everyone and everything else. I’m so done with capitalism.

    • Tug@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I had/have such a hard time convincing people that this isn’t traditional inflation as much as it’s corporate price gouging. This is being done to us, not a result of Biden’s economic policies

  • Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Economic growth” = stock market up

    Stock market is just the scoreboard for theft of economic value, it is useless as a measure of economic health except maybe inversely (if stock market is up that means more wealth is being extracted and funneled upward)

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 month ago

    We’ve known the ownership class was treated differently after the bank bailouts in 2008 which ran entirely contrary to capitalist theory as it was taught: if your company fails, then your company fails, and its detritus will feed growth elsewhere.

    But it turns out some companies are special and are too big to fail because when they go, dozens of other propped up companies collapse with them.

    I can’t help but wonder if we let that catastrophe happen, would it serve as a reminder why capitalism needs to be strictly regulated? Because we undid all the regulations erected thanks to the subprime mortgage crisis of 2007, and private equity is still demolishing huge chunks of the economy while investors get rich on bankruptcy shenanigans. This is the same kind of aristocratic bullshit as 1789.

    We had a peaceful protest. OWS. Then one night, NYC turned off all the cameras and unpeacefully swept it away. We were told they didn’t have specific demands. But they did, and their grievance was legit regardless.

    So now, society is stratified. The ownership class has segregated itself from the working class and they won’t consider grievances from the third estate. We saw during the Obama administration a _recovering economy _is not felt by the working class. We see now they’re glad to install a one-party autocracy to keep it that way.

    To be fair this was always the endgame. Our industrialst betters were sore over the New Deal. And later, school integration and interracial marriage.

    I think their plan is to literally arm robotic dogs with guns and try to to rule us at gunpoint, kinda like Hebron. See XKCD 1968.