• 0laura@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 months ago

          nft art is stupid but not for the reason most people think it is. most people don’t even know that there’s a difference between an nft and nft “art”

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            4 months ago

            Between 2014 & today, market appears to have determined neither are relevant. Corporations appear not to have found captivating use cases as well. Given this, is the lack of understanding to be expected?

            Compare to, like, folks understanding differences between Instagram & TikTok. More people understand because it’s relevant to them, regardless of the average Lemming’s view of the platforms.

            • 0laura@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Im not saying everyone should understand it, I just think the ratio of understanding to hatred is a bit skewed. you should at least know what something is before passionately hating it.

          • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            4 months ago

            oh wow an enlightened being that knows that nfts are links to monke jpegs stored in an extremely inefficient append-only database, instead of jpegs themselves. none of that shit is remotely practical unless you make some hopelessly paranoid libertarian flavoured assumptions about how world works

                • 0laura@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  nope! bitcoins aren’t fungible anymore. you can track all bitcoins across the entire blockchain, any bitcoins involved in illegal activity are “dirty” and not accepted by exchanges. “virgin” bitcoins are worth more than “used” bitcoins. they aren’t truly fungible anymore.

      • grandma@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        NFTs are an interesting concept and I’m sure they could have some real use cases, I’m just yet to see them. Autogenerated art definitely is not one of them though.

        • 0laura@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ve heard some people talk about how NFTs could maybe be used to replace concert tickets and stuff like that somehow I think? not sure what advantages that would have. maybe NFTs could be used as a less invasive sort of DRM?

          • pancakes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 months ago

            How is putting it on the blockchain advantageous versus a centralized server? Obviously the argument isn’t about reliability, so I just fail to get why they merit the significantly increased energy cost/ environmental damage.

            • 0laura@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              well the one advantage would be that you aren’t relying on some company to keep the servers running. I’m not a fan of NFTs, me struggling to come up with any uses for them should be a sign of that.

              • saigot@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                I am relying on some company to keep the doors to the concert venue open, might as well depend on them to control the ticket too.

                • 0laura@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  true, but right now it’s mostly done through a third party. the argument I’ve heard from nft fans is that nfts would allow you to skip that step

  • subignition@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not foolproof but you can also make a bookmarklet to unbind the top-level event which can sometimes force right-click to work.

    javascript:void(document.oncontextmenu=null);

    • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      there’s also an extension that can usually bypass anything the site uses to change right click behaviour

  • evidences@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    4 months ago

    The amount of pages I’m unable to right and copy text from is to damn high. I gotta remember this.

    • (⬤ᴥ⬤)OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      for youtube yes but not for other sites i don’t think

      • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I just tested in an application my job have and didn’t work, neither the shift+right click

        Edit: not on Firefox, but edge (don’t judge me, is the one installed by IT and I don’t care enough to open a ticket for another browser)

  • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    you don’t need shift right click to do either of those things on youtube, you can always right click on a thumbnail and get the normal menu, and if you right click twice on a video you get the normal menu