Blåhaj Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 11 months ago

Conversing with Mathematicians

mander.xyz

message-square
40
link
fedilink
357

Conversing with Mathematicians

mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 11 months ago
message-square
40
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    169
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    What about plain old x = -10?

    -10 ^ 2 = 100
    -10 ^ 3 = -1000
    -10 ^ 5 = -100000

    • Redacted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      118
      ·
      11 months ago

      Isn’t that the joke?

    • enkers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s what he wrote, I imagine.

      • Siethron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        11 months ago

        It is, but with imaginary numbets

        • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          11 months ago

          numbet

          • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            numberwang

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      11 months ago

      i² = -1 so…

    • thedudeabides@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nothing gets past you eh?

      • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        11 months ago

        people being pedantic showoffs doesn’t really register as humor for me, TBH

        • thedudeabides@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s true, the OOP is being quite snarky with their comment on a post where someone’s had a genuine basic doubt

    • dwindling7373@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      11 months ago

      10 * i^2 is -10.

    • Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      That was my immediate thought too.

    • Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Boooooring

  • Deebster@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    11 months ago

    When all you have is an imaginary hammer, everything looks like a rotation around the imaginary unit circle.

    Explanation of maths

    x = -10, i = √-1 so i² = -1 and 10i²=-10

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      Found the math but no explanation.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 months ago

        The squareroot of 100 is ±10.

        • OozingPositron@feddit.cl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          The square root is always positive, but you can plug it into the quadratic formula to get the two possible values.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            11 months ago

            Okay, fine the square roots of 100 are ±10.

          • ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            11 months ago

            There’s no reason to bring the quadratic formula into this. Square roots can be negative, but when talking about the square root it’s normally assumed to be the principal square root, which is the positive one.

          • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Nope. To clarify, square roots are the opposite of squaring.

            Now ask yourself:

            What is 10² ?

            What is (-10)² ?

            If you get the same answer, then they are both the roots of the answer. +10 and -10 then gets together called ±10

    • fx3@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      IIRC, your spoilery “so” is the other way round. The right side is the definition, and the left-hand side a layman’s shorthand, as the root operator isn’t defined on negative numbers.

      I might very well be wrong. My being a mathematician has been over for a while now, my being a pedantic PITA not though.

      • Deebster@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t know enough to know how correct your pedantry is (technically or not), but to explain the meme it made sense to go through the symbols in the order you see them. I never got any points from the proof questions in exams anyway.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    11 months ago

    Wait, isn’t x just -10 if x^3 is not 1000?

    • bi_tux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      yes, it is

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 months ago

    that is a very long way to write -10

  • Yaysuz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    What an extremely unnecessary explanation. As a math teacher I would have deducted points for this answer.

    • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      “show your work”

      Malicious compliance intensifies

    • Razzazzika@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Unless I was in that clas where we had to write mathematical proofs. I HATED those. Sure, you solved the question but write out this complicated reason for why your answer is the correct answer.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    My brain

    It hurts

    • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      He is trolling with overcomplicating

  • Ravi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    No definition what values are suitable for x.

    • quicksand@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      11 months ago

      x has to be -10, right? Or am I missing something?

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, I think the point is that the person answering was wrong/over complicating. If x=10i, then x^2 would be -100 (or potentially -10 depending on what you think the ^2 is applied to).

        • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          11 months ago

          They said x=10i^2, not 10i. Difference is it equals -10, and they chose not to simplify.

        • SoleInvictus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          They’re correct, it’s just overcomplicated as fuck in ways that are correct but completely irrelevant to the question.

      • Ravi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Depends on what are the allowed values for x are. Real numbers, complexe numbers, binary or I made up my own numbers ;)

      • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        The answer in the meme (10i^2) is -10

      • Malgas@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Probably what they were going for, but there are literally an infinite number of exotic arithmetic spaces you could ask this question in. For example, x=10 works in any ring with a modulus greater than 100 and less than 1000.

        • Umbrias@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          fortunately math problems are administered in the context of the class, so it will be pretty obvious that it’s in the complex plane.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      import math

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.37K users / day
  • 5.21K users / week
  • 9.2K users / month
  • 20.6K users / 6 months
  • 322 local subscribers
  • 15.2K subscribers
  • 4.72K Posts
  • 95.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org