Jeremy Clarkson: Just been for a walk round the farm and I’m a bit alarmed by how few butterflies there are.

Something is afoot.

Danny Wallace: Diesel-smelling Top Gear host who threatened climate protestors misses butterflies.

  • polygon6121@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    412
    ·
    4 months ago

    To be fair. His farming ventures have moved his opinion on climate in a positive direction. People can change their mind and that is a good thing. I would even go as far as calling it a very good sign that even a person as stubborn as the great ape Clarkson can change their opinion on this matter is absolutely fantastic. Good on Clarkson! And fuck the other guy for shoving up the past in his face when he is trying to be better.

    • a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      159
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      To be fair. His farming ventures have moved his opinion on climate in a positive direction.

      But have they? His insistence at this point is that he doesn’t have to do anything, or change anything, science will “solve the issue”. Nothing better than someone who thinks any mess they make can be cleaned up by someone else so why bother trying to make any changes that makes your life slightly less convenient?

      He added: ‘I won’t drive a Tesla. I’ve got probably 10 cars, all with V8 engines. I don’t think electric cars solve anything. Science is going to be needed here, not politics. Science will solve it eventually. Always does.’

      https://metro.co.uk/2024/04/29/problem-jeremy-clarksons-global-warming-joke-20736068/

      To be fair. His farming ventures have moved his opinion on climate in a positive direction.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        124
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Uhh isn’t progressing to electric cars… science progressing to help solve the issue? What a strange train of thoughts.

        • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          67
          ·
          4 months ago

          I know someone who has a similar outlook (climate change is real but science will solve it, so we don’t need to change anything). Basically anything science produces toward that end they will move the goalpost and say it’s not worth pursuing because science will fix it.

          It is essentially their way of making climate change denialism seem reasonable and open-minded. I think if somebody came up with a miracle device to magically reverse everything, they’d complain it’s too costly at any price.

          • sudo42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            34
            ·
            4 months ago

            It is essentially their way of making climate change denialism seem reasonable and open-minded. I think if somebody came up with a miracle device to magically reverse everything, they’d complain it’s too costly at any price.

            Yup. When/if we do find a way to dial back global warming, billionaires will be screaming for us to not use it because they’ve already found ways to make money off of people dying.

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          4 months ago

          Uhh isn’t progressing to electric cars… science progressing to help solve the issue?

          No. It isn’t.

          It’s capitalism shifting their private transport scam from an energy source that they exploited the living crap out off to another that they haven’t mismanaged into the ground yet.

        • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 months ago

          What he thinks will happen is Tony Stark inventing a… Thing. And this Thing will make the climate better by doing… Stuff. And no one will have to change or do anything or even think about it because this Thing will do the Stuff for them.

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 months ago

          No, its more like corporations moving to capitalize on peoples desire to affect change.

          They help, but they don’t solve the issue. They’re a bandage for a gaping chest wound. It’ll staunch the bleeding… a little, but it won’t heal it.

      • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        60
        ·
        4 months ago

        He’s right about electric cars not solving anything but wrong about politics not solving it. Science has already provided the solutions like over a decade ago but no one is willing to implement it.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I’m really tired of this pervasive fantasy where people actually think we can get rid of all cars and bring public transport to the masses in the space of a year.

          We live in a car centric society and changing that is going to take a decade at the minimum.

          EVs are our best solutions currently, we don’t have time to wait for trains or hydrogen. We should absolutely start trying to phase cars out completely but that doesn’t negate the fact that saying “EVs don’t help” is essentially being an oil barons mouthpiece.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            changing that is going to take a decade at the minimum.

            And that’s way too optimistic. Given the life expectancy of modern autos, the “quick” option of EVs will be a couple decades or more.

            Building car-centric towns and cities has taken most of a century of constant growth. Now those cities exist and we no longer have the growth so rebuilding them is a much bigger job. We’re talking many decades, likely a century or more. In the meantime we can’t afford to be stuck with ICE.

            Although maybe you’re not from the US so the problem is not as severe. Here in Massachusetts we also have the advantage of so many towns and cities being built out before cars. We’re “behind” on being car-centric so hopefully can fix that trend more quickly

            • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              4 months ago

              changing that is going to take a decade at the minimum.

              And that’s way too optimistic

              Best time to start was years ago, second best time to start is now. Maybe we can start by voting in favor of the next public transit initiative in our respective local elections.

              • AA5B@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                Of course, but the point is that EVs are a useful step, even if transit is the goal and start now.

                Also that it’s going to take quite a while. Yes, we need to plant that tree ASAP and we need to take really good care of it and we need to appreciate shade as we get it …… but also realize it won’t be full grown until long after we’re gone.

          • davidagain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            (Hydrogen is very much not a solution. It takes way too much energy to make and it’s very dangerous to store.)

          • pedz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            4 months ago

            No it’s capitalism and the car industry that wants to continue selling cars that are pushing for EVs.

            Cars in general are bad for the environment and the people around them. EVs are a bit better than internal combustion, but it’s not a miracle.

            EVs still emit tons of rubber particles because of tire shedding, they are heavier and require more energy to move around, they still require vast amounts of paved parking and roads, and they can still crush pedestrians and animals.

            If you have to have a car, it should be an EV if possible, but it would be better to reduce the amount of cars in cities and around us.

            • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              4 months ago

              So we agree the man with 10 v8 engine cars should move to EVs or public transit rather than having 10 cars? Because he’s saying fuck that.

              • pedz@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                He’s not using all 10 at the same time every day for a multi-hours commute. In a way he’s right. In his country, that means not cancelling HS2. It’s not his personal fault. And him changing a car to EV won’t change much, aside from putting one more car on the market.

                Again, my point is, it’s not science that is pushing EVs, it’s capitalism. Buy an EV!1!!! Buy buy buy!11! ThEy ArE GoNnA SaVe ThE PlAnEt!

                No need for policy changes. All we need to do collectively is ban plastic straws, drive EVs, recycle, and those that are not doing this will be blamed!

                https://www.abc27.com/news/environment/keeping-old-cars-longer-can-help-the-environment-more-than-buying-new-electric-cars-study-finds/

                https://www.cargurus.co.uk/Cars/articles/whats-greener-used-car-or-new-ev

                https://mycarheaven.com/2023/07/keeping-your-old-petrol-car-may-be-better-than-buying-an-ev/

                • davidagain@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Myth. https://www.topgear.com/car-news/electric/mythbusting-world-evs-better-buy-new-or-keep-your-old-car

                  But what if your existing petrol or diesel car is perfectly satisfactory? Obviously if you cause one less vehicle – of any kind – to be manufactured, you’re saving CO2 in the short term. But if you drive a lot of miles or your car is thirsty, then sell it to someone who drives less. Getting an EV would after a very few years move you into credit. If it’s efficient and you drive little, probably hold on to it for a while.

                  In most areas of life, the greenest thing is simply to buy less stuff and keep it for longer. But with ICE cars, because they emit so much CO2 in use, it’s not always so simple.

                  HS2 wasn’t going to fix much. Shave 20 minutes off a multi-hour journey. There’s already fast, frequent rail between London and the other major cities in HS2. It’s just very expensive and HS2 wasn’t going to fix that either. What would help is good rail between the North West and Yorkshire, where it’s absurdly bad and has been for a long time.

                  Now if you could get rail or light rail out to my town or up the bus frequency and speed to match light rail, I’d gladly give up running my (second hand) electric car, but I need it to be so much cheaper, because the electric car costs me £4 a week to run if I don’t use the light railway (plus £3 a day parking), and light rail costs me £6 a day if I park and ride. (I don’t miss my petrol car at all. It cost me £20 a week to run, plus the parking, and it really was no fun to drive at all.)

          • currycourier@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            If you have 10 cars and buy an 11th thats electric you’re not really solving anything. The problem is overconsumption moreso than method of propulsion, the bulk of a car’s lifetime emissions are a result of manufacturing rather than daily use.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t think electric cars solve anything. Science is going to be needed here, not politics. Science will solve it eventually. Always does.

        • Jimbo@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          always does

          Yeah someone clearly doesn’t know history loll

          As much as I like Top Gear, I’m embarrassed to share a name with this guy. Why does every public personality named Jeremy have to be a cunt? Maybe it’s just British TV personalities.

      • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        To be fair, it’s corporations doing the vast majority of the polluting.

        Where I live, electric cars are essentially a net-zero because most of our electricity comes from coal and gas.

        Does that absolve any individual from doing what they can? Absolutely not.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        There are tons of people with that opinion that “the eggheads will just figure it out like they always do”. IMO it’s incorrect, but people on all ends of the political spectrum have that take.

        IMO he’s correct that individual action doesn’t matter, but he’s wrong that political action doesn’t matter. It reminds me of the gun hobbyists in the US who are against gun control because they don’t want their enjoyment of their hobby to be constrained by laws intended to get less people killed. There are solutions here where you can have your cake and eat it, but you just don’t want to decouple the fantasy of your hobby from the reality of it.

        There’s nothing wrong with enjoying guns or cars as a hobby, but you should also acknowledge that their widespread presence is a net negative for society and regulating them would be a good thing for the world in the long run. It doesn’t mean you can’t have your toys.

        Certainly nobody who drives their car to the office every day on a congested freeway is thinking about how fun it is to drive a V8. Less car dependency and more public transit would mean less cars on the road which would make driving more fun for petrol heads like Clarkson anyway. He should want more public transit, cyclist infrastructure, etc. It would benefit him indirectly even as a petrol head.

        What I find funniest though is when he says in that quote in the same breath “electric cars don’t solve anything” and then “science will solve the problem”. My brother in Christ, science made the electric cars!

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      If he’s changed wouldn’t he know what the issue was? It’s a little worrying that he hasn’t made the connection if that’s the case.

      I don’t see this as a change of opinion, just a severe lack of understanding as a whole.

        • DessertStorms
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Yeah, about his show, and what a good guy he now is… And look, it worked!

      • essell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        4 months ago

        Is it possible a tweet doesn’t contain the entirety of his thoughts on the subject?

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Plenty more characters available, could have made himself not seem so clueless or oblivious to what he’s done and did or even for the future.

          Climate change is serious, would work instead of something is affoot for example.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Change is rarely immediate or miraculous. He’s moved a little, hopefully he continues on that path.

        I won’t hold my breath, but I won’t refuse to accept that change has occurred. Slight though it may be.

      • lone_faerie
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Idk, to me it seems like he’s changed his opinion on the cause but not yet realized the effects

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      4 months ago

      To be fair. His farming ventures have moved his opinion on climate in a positive direction.

      Standard issue conservative. They only complain when it begins to affect them. If he didn’t have a farm, would he still have moved in that direction?

      Nope.

      A common characteristic of conservatives is a lack of empathy.

      Am I happy he did? Yes.

      Am I holding my breath that he’ll actually vote for change? Nope.

      • enbyecho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Standard issue conservative. They only complain when it begins to affect them. If he didn’t have a farm, would he still have moved in that direction?

        I’m not saying that he did, or not completely, but people are allowed to learn and change opinions. It is possible!

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      4 months ago

      meh. he profited personally off of lambasting the very scientists who were trying to warn us. he literally made his fortune off of glorifying petrol guzzling shitwagons.

      fuck clarkson. he’s a fucking toolbag who’s just now - as the world is on fire- is slowly starting to wake to the crisis he personally helped fuel.

      • DaleGribble88@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Someone missed the episode(s?) where he raced the public transit system and lost. Or raced other drivers in noticeably slower cars in highly congested traffic and lost, or raced a bicycle and lost.

        A semi-common through-line of the show was that cars are, and should be, for fun. (Full disclosure this was often pushed most heavily by James May, but I feel like Jeremy could have said no at any point.) They often lambasted average and everyday use cars.

        I loved my old sports car! It was 2 seats and too much power! I had to get rid of it because it was unreliable and unsafe for traveling with my first kid. Neither would have been an issue with good public transit infrastructure in place.

        Cars are not the problem, but car dependency absolutely is.

        (I don’t totally feel this way and do think cars a major contributing factor in some problems, like pollution of microplastic particulates from aggressive driving, but that isn’t as quippy.)

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          But where would you get the gas to power your sports car without the massive fossil fuel infrastructure?

          • DaleGribble88@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            From a refinery? Losing car dependency doesn’t mean that the global oil industry goes away over night. Shoot, if we invented completely safe and cheap scifi teleporters, making all current forms of transportation obsolete, I don’t believe every factory in the world would stop producing gasoline.

            My thinking for this primarily comes from vacuum tubes. The technology has been completely replaced by better performing, cheaper, smaller, and more reliable components for about 50 years now. However, there are still 2 or 3 factories churning out tubes for guitar amplifiers supplying the world for the handful of enthusiasts who enjoy that sort of thing.

            Go ahead and throw mechanical typewriters into that same category of “Wow! I can’t believe that they still make these?” as well.

        • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I never watched the show, but I did visit its wiki page.

          It looks like they did 6 races against public transportation, and the car won 5 of them. They also did 2 four way races between car, water, bike and public transport, and car and bike were the two first place winners.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oh yes, great. When it is too late suddenly the fucks who are responsible for this mess have a change of heart and deserve sympathies? Give me a break…

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        they’ll shout “why didn’t anyone warn us!” while cashing their residual checks from the show that lampooned climate change and encouraged millions to buy gas guzzling shitwagons.

    • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      No. You don’t get to “give back to the community” after shitting in the mental water reservoir for decades.

    • eskimofry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      We neither have the time nor a duty to wait for or expect assholes who only think about themselves to come around on the climate and ecology after they have thoroughly burned planet earth for money.

      You’re a dumb whore if you think we should respect planet burning greedy leeches.

      • polygon6121@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        4 months ago

        Fuck you.

        I hate to break it to you but these boomer guys are in charge. Nothing will happen until they either die or change their mind. That is the reality. Everything that has been done so far for the environment have done nothing at all, every year we have a new record carbon emissions. It does not matter how many solar panels and EVs they shove down our throats. It is not sustainable.

        • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Given the current pace, they’re gonna die first. You’re being a fatalist basically, and then mad at someone for telling others to have more sense of urgency? 🙄🙄🙄 You’re saying solar panels and EVs don’t make a difference? You’re just lying, wrong.

      • Redredme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        Assholes. Dumb whores. Leeches. Yeah, you really know how to motivate people and get them on-board!

        Keep up the good work!

      • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yup. Oh, someone changed his mind bc he got into a different business, but before that the information was all readily available, but he ignored it bc he was previously profiting? Wow stand up guy, only paying attention to issues impacting his bottom line.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think it was the first episode of the first season where one of his neighbors bitched him out over climate change. Really satisfying to see.

    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Exactly. There was a time when I didn’t know how to multiply 6 by 5.

      But I learned, as did I’m sure all of you.

      Ignorance can be cured.

      Punishing people for the ignorance of their past when their present self is trying to do better is wrong.

      Maybe be a little more charitable towards your fellow man.

  • VonCesaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    4 months ago

    To those curious, do not check out the original post

    Comments are entirely “cloud seeding”, “blocking solar radiation with dangerous chemicals”, and sensible people arguing for encouraging biodiversity being shut out, a few by Car Man himself

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      4 months ago

      a few by Car Man himself

      I was put off until this part. Curiosity is now at high levels. Expecting massive hoop jumping and that’s always funny to watch.

    • verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      Telling adults what to do will drive them to do the exact opposite. You tell me what to read, I’ll buy Clarkson an aircraft carrier! Don’t test me!

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s Twitter it’s practically a requirement that everyone on there is a moron who thinks the Earth is flat and the moon is a sticker.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    4 months ago

    I quite enjoyed Top Gear. However. I have since found Clarkson to be just another rich old right winger that doesn’t care what he says. He’s a bit of an asshole.

  • anywho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I suppose he only cares about the climate because it now affects his farming business, that’s it.

    • ninth_plane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 months ago

      Having watched Clarkson’s Farm I think he honestly went into the farming business to test and resolve his opinions on the climate. He still loves cars but uses the car persona to look at farming practices.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    4 months ago

    The only reason Clarkson is still well liked is because he is funny and charismatic. But over all he is still an arch-conservative Tory jerk.

    • Corhen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      for sure. I love him as a TV persona, but definitly feel he and I would NOT get along in person.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Part of that is just a lot of funny tv people are mean spirited in their jokes, but may be nicer when not on TV

      • Jikiya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is amusing, as while watching Clarkson’s Farm, I find myself constantly yelling at the TV that he’s being dumb. But seems like every time he is interacting(in person) with someone he doesn’t know intimately he is extremely kind and deferential. With the exception being people that are antagonizing him in some way, even if they’re not being malicious about it.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 months ago

    I used to see so many monarch butterflies when I was a kid in Indiana. So many fireflies too. I don’t think I’ve seen a single monarch since I moved back about a decade ago and hardly any fireflies.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Plant some milkweed in your garden and they’ll come. It’s literally a weed, so minimal care is required.

    • IMongoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Don’t rake your leaves up in the fall and don’t mow in the spring until you are afraid of being fined. Plant a native garden. I have 3 species of fireflies in my little yard, and there are a lot of them.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        We actually do all of that already. We even had a local person from the DNR come in and help us with choosing native plants and getting rid of invasive ones. Very few fireflies. There used to be so many when I was a kid, you could just walk around catching them in your hands in the evening.

  • Subverb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 months ago

    I saw a butterfly in my yard a few days ago and I just stared at it and realized that I don’t think I’ve seen one in years.

  • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    I only have hatred for one human and that Jeremy Clarkson.

    Many years ago, not long after the MHxxx flight when missing, Mr Clarkson was on a flight on posted a picture of the fallen oxygen masks on his flight with some comment about I hope we don’t crash. This was shortly after it was determined what happened to the plane.

    I made a comment on Twitter as a reply saying that’s not cool. To which Clarkson replied saying how am I supposed to know when I’m on a plane dummy, even though he just posted to Twitter from the plane.

    What proceeded was thousands of messages from his fan boys calling me a loser and such. Which is confusing as I would argue the losers were the people defending this clown.

    • LordGimp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Not Hitler, not Stalin, not Mao, not even General Butt Naked. Jeremy Clarkson. That’s the guy who deserves the hate. Yep.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not Hitler, not Stalin, not Mao

        Be extremely angry at three guys who were dead 40 years before you were even born

        Give a climate denialist with an enormous following of wealthy car-loving elites a pass

        Find a little room in your hate for someone with a bit of relevance.

        • LordGimp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I got plenty of hate lmao I hate kamala Harris for being a nazi pos who actively fought to keep people in prisons because slave labor is so cheap. I hate Donald Trump for being g the shittiest nugget of turd ever to pass through Satan’s anus. And I also hate Hitler, Stalin, and Mao for popularizing being an unrepentant piece of shit on the global scale.

          Do I hate a dumb, sarcastic media personality for being dumb and/or sarcastic? Nah. There’s bigger fish to fry. I don’t hate tuckie wuckie for being dumb, that’s expected. I hate tuckie wuckie for being a traitorous piece of shit that got trump elected the first time. You see?

        • LordGimp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not only do they exist, but they are directly responsible for an entire generation of child soldiers. Possibly also ate children. Depends on who is telling the story.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes, but like with all these assholes they’re only concerned when it directly affects them…

      Better late than never, but I really wish these asshats had at least 2 brain cells dedicated to “giving a shit about other people.”