• Plume (She/Her)
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1.04K
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    People. We, the French, pulled a left-wing coalition out of our asses in less than a week and managed to “win” an election. You have months. Hope is permitted.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    806
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t understand you people in this thread.

    Ever since the debate, people have been calling for Joe Biden to step down from the presidential race and give the place to someone else.

    Now I read the comments and everyone is criticizing and accusing the Democrats of not knowing what they’re doing? Are you for real? They’re doing EXACTLY what people have been asking for. They’re doing EXACTLY what needs to be done if they want to win.

    Fucking hell you guys, make up your fucking mind.

    Sincerely,

    A Canadian with severe anxiety over your next presidential election.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      283
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, to be fair, he should have stepped down a year ago, or at least 3 months ago. I vaguely remember him saying he was going to be a 1 term candidate in 2020.

      Anyway, I respect Biden. I honestly think he was a better president than Obama, Bush, Trump and Clinton. Perhaps the best since Carter or JFK.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      137
      ·
      5 months ago

      Those are not necessarily the same people.

      But there is no good option here. The good option would have been to run a good candidate over a year ago. That time has obviously long since passed.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      5 months ago

      Many of the people involved in such agitation are not arguing in good faith. They simply want to attack the ‘libs’ at every opportunity, and reality be damned.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      This was an astroturfing campaign covering our media and also via bots on social media.

      I watched the debate and while he was slower, and mixed up words he actually was aware of US goals and challenges (despite what media tried to imply), trump was more energetic but he was constantly spewing nonsense, and while part of it was lying as usual, part of it was clear that he was actually getting lost.

      I even wrote that in certain that if Biden steps down the same bots will start campaign how Democrats were cheated to discourage them from voting (like it was worth Bernie).

      I’m definitively voting for Kamala now no matter what ridiculous bullshit they will come up on her on September-October (you can be sure there will be some scandal that will turnout to be nothing burger after election). I got fooled (like a lot of people) in 2016 to vote 3rd party and we got trump.

      Republicans are actually a minority they can only win if they discourage enough people from voting. That’s why they are against laws that that make voting easier.

      I actually was hoping Biden would run as he has great experience with foreign leaders as well as very successful reaching compromises and passing bills that otherwise wouldn’t fly.

      As I say though I will 100% vote for Kamala (or whomever will be the democratic candidate), definitively not the fascist party and in fact anyone on Democrats side looks good.

    • apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      5 months ago

      One thing I appreciate about Canadian elections is how quickly they happen. An election is called, campaigning is like a month or two and then we find out the new government just hours after casting our votes.

    • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not speaking for the rest of the thread, but…

      1. Biden should have said he wasn’t up for reelección since day 1
      2. The Democratic Party hasn’t known what to do since the 2016 election… at least.
    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m excited AF… maybe the people you’re reading are republican plants that are just trying to make it feel like chaos.

      The fact that this happened the weekend after the RNC makes me feel it was very well planned.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ever since the debate, people have been calling for Joe Biden to step down from the presidential race and give the place to someone else. … Now I read the comments and everyone is criticizing and accusing the Democrats of not knowing what they’re doing?

      Lol, you thought those people were arguing in good faith.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes some of us been paying attention to who is backing him and who wasn’t. Some of us had noticed that all the leftists in the party were still behind Joe Biden while all the neoliberals weren’t. Some of us have noticed that the president who has protected worker rights and expanded consumer protection and wants to tax the wealthy is getting pushed out by the corporate Democrats.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s been chaos in the comments for a while now this is just catharsis for a lot of people and reaffirming for some of the naysayers.
      You are gonna see a lot of takes from a lot of terminally online types.

      Now just comes the actual work and it’s gonna look chaotic for a while. I hope we get it together.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ever since the debate, people have been calling for Joe Biden to step down

      Yes, some.

      Now I read the comments and everyone is criticizing and accusing the Democrats of not knowing what they’re doing

      Yes, others.

      Different people speak up on different days. This is especially true in social media where often people won’t speak up if they know they’re going to get jumped on.

    • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      All of this should have been done a couple years ago for presidential hopefuls to gather resources and prepare for the elections. The assumption that Biden was seeking a second term stalled a lot of minor steps needed to build a campaign. Biden stepping down a month before the DNC is gonna be a shit show. Who’s gonna run for becoming a candidate? How are they gonna fundraise quickly enough to get the word out? This is a clusterfuck of poorly timed decisions and I only hope the new candidate can gather enough support to win the presidential election. Given the Democratic party’s penchant of favoring people from their inner circle, I doubt they’ll be well received by the general public to begin with.

    • Kroxx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      Personally the best news I’ve heard in a while. I think there is a little bit of a knee jerk reaction happening because a lot is on the line and people are scared because it’s such an unknown right now. When things settle more and the smoke clears I think everything will be more positive.

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I personally just said last week that I believed only Biden was capable of beating Trump, so I’m feeling pretty sick right now. God, I hope I’m wrong.

      We haaaaaavvvvvve to see this example and set a damn age limit for people to hold such high positions in our country. Old dude may have very well just sent us down an irreversible and utterly destructive path by seeking the office in the first place.

      I know Bernie Sanders is old too, but damn I wish he had won the nomination. We wouldn’t be in this crisis right now. Still though, it’s a gamble electing people who are already waist deep in their grave.

      Man

      What a strange and historic month this has been. We’re all living in a very big moment in history right now, just, all the way around.

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Lemmy, as opposed to reddit, has seemed to be very much on the Keep Biden train for some reason.

      I for one will be happy with any candidate that can do two to three campaign appearances per day for the next four months and doesn’t have the Genocide Joe baggage. Everything else is gravy.

    • EnderWiggin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t understand you people in this thread.

      Goes to show how many of these people were disingenuous and never actually wanted the party to win regardless. Some of those people operate on the far right. Some of them were just Trumpers in disguise, foreign operators, bots, etc. It’s a lot of bullshit. I’m looking forward to supporting Kamala though.

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I think part of the reason it feels like “wtf are you doing?!?” is because we were really saying “Joe needs to step the fuck up or step aside” and then in the last week he’s thrown some absolute hard hits at Trump making it look like “holy shit, we got old Joe back!”. Then suddenly after appearing to wake up, he goes “nah, I’m good.”.

      Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad he’s stepping aside. But it’s been a bit of a rollercoaster and not a very consistent message. They kept telling us to shut up and follow Biden and anyone who doesn’t is supporting facism and then suddenly, “nah, not Biden, it’s cool”? You can’t pump a rhetoric machine up and then expect the brakes to stop it instantly.

  • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    458
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ll say just one thing:

    Every single one of you assholes who wouldn’t shut up about him stepping down since the dude missed the toilet bowl fifty years ago after a particularly wild night out better sure as fuck step up now that Old Joe has stepped down.

    A sitting god damned President of the United States has stepped aside less than half a year before reelection. Make no mistake: The man swallowed his pride and ego HARD to make this decision. Let’s honor that by creating a wall of votes so god. damned. thick. Riley Reid would gasp.

  • credo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    287
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I know people will say this is bad, a new campaign will be rushed, etc. But I think we all know Biden was an excuse for many not to vote, or worse, to vote for Trump. Withdrawing will be his legacy when we win, not his failing.

    Thank you President Biden. You are a hero.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      136
      ·
      5 months ago

      Biden absolutely did the right thing and, perhaps, the most courageous thing.

      Democrats would have coalesced around him if decided to keep going but we’ve been begging him to step aside. This is a key difference between Trump “fans” and Biden voters. We’re not drawn to him as a personality.

      Once a candidate is selected, I don’t care who it is, we must support them because not doing so is voting for an end to democracy.

      The fact that we’re here is a travesty.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      5 months ago

      People have done more with less campaign time and he will go down as having listened and done what was requested of the people and party I honestly think this says a lot of good stuff about the democratic party and Biden once we get the spin right.

      • cogman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It won’t be hard. Kamala is going to be able to put a bullseye on Trump and republican politics like Biden simply wasn’t ever able to do. She’s going to be able to hyper focus on the deeply unpopular beliefs of the base and it will be hard for Trump or others to really deny it without losing their core supporters.

        Further, because she’s relatively unknown there’s really not the same baggage as there was with Hillary. Most people don’t know who she is and I think that really plays to her favor.

        • ulkesh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 months ago

          Let’s be honest here, Trump will never lose his core supporters. He could literally turn out to be the devil incarnate, and his supporters will say it’s their god’s will. He’s a 34-count convicted felon and they see that as something to boast about.

          The issue in this country is that the less educated are following those with a playbook of getting the less educated to vote, to vote for them, and in areas that games the electoral college system.

          We were a hair’s breadth from another Trump term in 2020 by 11,000 votes in GA. Not to mention his coup attempt.

          It cannot be that close again. It must be decisive. I hope Harris, if she is the nominee, can achieve that.

        • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Kamala is going to be able to put a bullseye on Trump

          I agree with you but this is an interesting choice of words given other recent events lol.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’ll be great to have a woman talking about abortion and making this election a referendum on national abortion access.

      Americans love to vote for something rather than against something.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Nobody who would consider voting for Trump is going to vote for whoever replaces Biden. Nobody. This is about getting apathetic voters off their butt. Which I hope works, but every part of my being is telling me they’re going to pick someone who apathetic voters wouldn’t vote for anyway.

    • jwt@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m so thankful I live in a country where 4 months is (still) believed to be a ridiculously long amount of time to campaign.

      Good luck America! Please show the rest of the world you’re still capable of making sane choices.

    • jumjummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      Except for the bank of those who are just Russian agents who will undoubtedly find some new “excuse” why the Democrat candidate is not fit to run.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        5 months ago

        Expect lots of “cop” comments in regards to Harris from Russians totally real leftists.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 months ago

          She was a cop. She called herself the “top cop”. I fucking hate the police and she’s got my vote over a literal pedophile felonious fascist.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m no fan of cops, but I think this actually plays very well with the political environment. Recent elections saw rebukes of progressive Police policies in the Pacific North West. As much as I wish it were otherwise, that message isn’t resonating with voters even in considerably progressive areas.

            Having a traditional prosecutor may be an advantage in that regard. And it may provide us a new avenue to look at how we can have better policing that more people will support.

      • sentientity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Fwiw, I am harshly critical of most elected dems but I have never considered not voting. I think I and many people hold our allies (for lack of better term) to higher standards and get angrier when they fuck up. So I think a lot of these posts are just that. Harsh criticism of a candidate =/= not voting for them. People are strategic about voting pragmatically, they’re just also very frustrated with the dem establishment’s behavior.

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      But, when democrats lose due to this move… ???

      I would have preferred him to stay on course. While I don’t care what sex they are or color or whatever, a fuckload of garbage twats in this country sure as fuck do. Biden was also likeable in public appearances. I have fuck all idea what Harris is like, and 5y of time vs like 4 months to win public opinion, oof it will be an absolute blitz. And I consider myself rather knowledgeable and up-to-date on US politics. I have friends that have no idea what’s going on at any given time, or why.

      I need to research her now and become familiar, but I see this as a big negative for chances, not positive. Anxiety spiked hard about what’s to come.

      Anyone in Canada looking for a roommate…?

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        While I don’t care what sex they are or color or whatever, a fuckload of garbage twats in this country sure as fuck do

        This is my least favorite argument I keep seeing for why Biden shouldn’t drop out. The racist shit-heels you’re referring to were always going to vote for Trump regardless of who the Democratic candidate is. There is no reason for Democrats to try and appeal to racists, and even if there were it would be immoral to do so. Sacrificing your values to win is no true victory.

        You’re losing your nerve, and while that’s understandable, it’s self-sabotage.

        • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I wouldn’t say I’m ‘sacrificing values’, more like “woman bad, no vote for” is strong here still. Yeah yeah ‘we will see how it goes’ but that’s exactly what fucking scares me, we don’t get a “best 2 out of 3” save, and we need fucking EVERYONE on board to avert catastrophe.

          I’m in a swing state and it’s like a sea of Trumpers and I’m just like “yeah, we are fucked”.

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    245
    ·
    5 months ago

    The biggest hot-topic issue this election should have been abortion (and by extension, SCOTUS). But the discussion got side-tracked by all this talk of old age. The debate just reinforced the narrative and concern with Biden. They would have hammered him over and over, with Trump bragging about how quickly he recovered from an injury.

    Now, we have:

    • A sittingVP with actual Whitehouse experience, who can take credit for all the economic policies under Biden. Also, a former Senator.
    • A prosecutor and former Attorney General vs a convicted felon.
    • The age issue disappears (in fact, it now becomes a liability against Trump).
    • A woman vs the guy who bragged about killing Roe v. Wade.
    • Future of SCOTUS.

    If she just keeps talking about those topics non-stop, she’ll do fine.

    The only thing better would have been if Biden had resigned to let people see her in the actual role, but this works. She picks a mid-westerner as VP who can stand up to Vance and it’s a whole new ballgame.

    I’m actually stoked about this race again.

  • ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    205
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well guys… Have you seen Trump’s mental decline since he last ran?! How old is he now?

    Surely nobody would be dumb enough to vote someone that old into office now… That is… What we have been saying? Right guys?

  • rustyfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    202
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s why I’m never gonna cancel my USA subscription. Your shows always have a crazy twist right before the season finale.

    Jokes aside: Not a single person who even considers voting for Trump is worth any hassle. Their vote is a coin flip on fucking acid. The dems should try to animate the lazy nonvoting pricks.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      210
      ·
      5 months ago

      It would be an awful lot easier than trying to salvage Biden’s image as it stands. If they do it right this should be super easy, but if they drag their heels on the changes necessary then it might be a lot harder.

      This is BIG opportunity to rebrand and show what really matters to the party.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        84
        ·
        5 months ago

        This is the perfect opportunity to do that! But I have absolutely zero faith in them actually doing that.

        But maybe I’ve become jaded in my age with politics. Maybe they won’t just choose the worst possible option.

          • Fisk400@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            31
            ·
            5 months ago

            Are they going to force Biden to run against his will or what is the plan here? If Biden dies, are Democrats not allowed to run at all because they aren’t allowed to replace him.

          • Nurgle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            5 months ago

            Dems haven’t even officially nominated anyone yet, dont think the republicans would get very far with that stunt

              • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                5 months ago

                If you think they’re that off the rails then they don’t need this as a premise to challenge Democrats in the first place.

          • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            5 months ago

            The thing is, it’s not the Democratic Party replacing Biden anymore. Biden has willfully stepped down, and given his support to Harris. To put it another way, Biden is no longer “being replaced”.

            But, that may not matter in the long run. The question now is when/if Republicans take this to court, and whether or not the judge decides to hear the case or not and how long that will take.

            As far as I know, judges have historically decided not to pursue a case if it would impede the election process (e.g., gerrymandered district ruled illegal, but still used because not enough time to redraw maps). I would like to hope that the Democratic Party gets the same curtsy in this case.

            However, I feel that right now given the current political climate, and the current way judges have been deciding in favor of the Republican agenda, this may not be the case and the new candidate will be tied up in legal tape to be able to campaign properly. The Republicans will cease upon this opportunity and use it against the Democratic Party to make them look weak and unable to do anything they say they will do. And to be honest, they won’t be wrong.

            Democrats are their own worst enemy, and their hubris will be to all of our detriment.

            https://youtu.be/-lm0Cy8gwvk

          • Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            from the article

            Election law expert Richard Hasen wrote that there is “no credence” to the notion that the Democratic Party could not legally replace Biden on the ticket, as he is not the nominee yet – the nominating process generally takes place during the Democratic National Convention.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          5 months ago

          Maybe they won’t just choose the worst possible option.

          Her turn 2.0 watch out yall here comes Hillary! /$

        • djsoren19@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think the fact that the party was willing to do this says a lot. They’ve already avoided the worst possible option, I’m willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah it was going to be impossible to properly move forward from this. There would be too much media coverage and division and lingering questions.

        Now though, we have a real opportunity to unify, and make several arguments to voters – Democrats listened and picked a younger candidate. We can also flip the script on candidate age now

      • braindefragger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I don’t see it that way at all. This seems like a great way to increase their votes. It’s not like they are going to lose voters who were going to vote Biden to begin with.

          • braindefragger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s never about those that were going to vote for Biden anyways. It’s always been about the undecided voters.

            Right. That’s obviously the whole point.

        • ECB@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah the reality is that Biden was 95% going to lose to Trump. Picking a new person is usially a huge risk, but in this case there wasn’t much to lose.

          As things stand right now, Trumps chances of winning just went down a bit. Worst case, they pick someone terrible with similar (non-)chances to Biden. Best case, they pick someone who wins.

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        5 months ago

        They’ve 100% thought through this. Harris takes over the Biden / Harris campaign war chest, and if Biden drops out now, the party can go into the align around Harris before the convention. And now we have 3+ months to get people hyped about not voting for an old white dude.

          • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            39
            ·
            5 months ago

            You’ve posted this 5 times in this thread in the last 20 minutes. Take a moment to read your own link…

            Election law expert Richard Hasen wrote that there is “no credence” to the notion that the Democratic Party could not legally replace Biden on the ticket, as he is not the nominee yet – the nominating process generally takes place during the Democratic National Convention.

          • dvoraqs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            33
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            From the article you linked to:

            Election law expert Richard Hasen wrote that there is “no credence” to the notion that the Democratic Party could not legally replace Biden on the ticket, as he is not the nominee yet – the nominating process generally takes place during the Democratic National Convention.

          • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Republicans are going to play every trick in the book, legal, moral, ethical or not. They will shout it at the rallies, take every opportunity to stir up shit on television (with help from Koch and Sinclair owned media) and you will hear every reason why the democratic nominee cannot be President. If Democrats find someone with a squeaky clean record and the Republicans can’t find anything truthful, they’ll fabricate it with ease. “Kamala Harris ate a moldy bagel in 2018 therefore she can’t be president.”

            The one advantage Democrats have at this very second, is that Republicans and Trump can’t use the media machine to pre-emptively smear any one person, since nobody knows who the nominee will be yet. Use this opportunity well and combat the “ahh confusion, somehow only Trump makes sense” narrative that will be sure to be floated.

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      5 months ago

      If, and that’s a big if, they choose to field a moderately likeable replacement, there’s a chance they can actually re-energize the campaign and voters and get a big boost with a fresh face. That’s a big if though.

    • marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      Other countries have whole campaign seasons that are shorter. We’ve just gotten used to multi-year campaigns and never-ending reelection efforts. It wasn’t always like this, and I don’t think it’s good for us long-term.

    • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      Other countries have pulled out elections in two weeks. The us may not have that experience though. The campaign however had been directed at his opponent’s well known incompetence and malice. That may be the advantage of divisive politics.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Mike Johnson has literally already made it clear that in these circumstances he intends to CONTEST the new candidate being allowed on ballots.

      We live in the fucking stupidest ass timeline.

      The time for dropping Biden was before the fucking primaries and now we’re walking right the fuck into a Republican trap.

      Fuck me, someone just kill me now so Trump can’t institutionally fucking murder me.

      Source: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/johnson-replacing-biden-ticket-wrong-unlawful/story?id=112129063

      Democrats are fuckin morons who want to lose.

      • Jordan117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        66
        ·
        5 months ago

        Mike Johnson is (as usual) full of shit. The DNC is still a month away and not a single state ballot deadline has passed.

      • Kroxx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        5 months ago

        Biden isn’t even the nominee yet that’s one of the reasons it was important this happened before the DNC. Before the nomination this is no official presidential candidate, ol’ Mikey Poo-Bear is yaking out of his ass. Mike even said “some legal impediments in at least a few of these jurisdictions”, he’s just posturing for attention. No more threatening than a bantam rooster when you walk in his coup.

      • Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        from the article

        Election law expert Richard Hasen wrote that there is “no credence” to the notion that the Democratic Party could not legally replace Biden on the ticket, as he is not the nominee yet – the nominating process generally takes place during the Democratic National Convention.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      They have the media bomb of “no incumbent” leading the headlines. This is one of the only media maneuvers that would change the conversation from “That Trump overcame assassination and adversity!” At this point a major shift was needed.

      The year and a half back log of memes against Biden that right wing contractors have saved up are now worthless. The right will have 3 months to make a cohesive media smear campaign (which they can do against the right candidate) but it will require lots of downtime as the high paid think tanks make astroturf.

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        The fact that Republican troll farms have to now spend time coming up with new material puts a small smile on my face.

        They will move swiftly though, while the Democrats are used to being sluggish, so vigilance is in order.

    • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      Plenty of other countries’ electoral campaigns advance far faster than Americans expect theirs to move, and US media is talking about politics all the damn time. If the Dems don’t do a massive screw up somehow, I think they’ll find out that switching the candidate will be far easier than they were expecting.

    • ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Lol… From a foreigner this is hilarious. Some of you still want to support the guy that tried disrupt the governmental process… He called the frigging election investigator FFS. You can listen to him tell her how 'her job is the most important in The country rn… and talk at length about how fraud will be found.

      People that want trump want a king. Plain and simple.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    168
    ·
    5 months ago

    Oh boy, I can’t wait for armchair pundits who were calling for Joe to step down to now turn around and start to nitpick Harris as if that wasn’t going to be the obvious successor.

    I’m 100% behind Harris or anyone who gets the Dem nom. Trump must be stopped.

    This is still a battle for America’s soul. Are we going to accept the first female president or the first convicted felon president? I sure hope the left turns out for this one, even if they aren’t super stoked about it, because we might never recover from another Trump disaster.

  • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    160
    ·
    5 months ago

    For all of y’all anxiety-pilled people: this is great news. Biden was stuck in negative momentum because his health issues had been exposed and were not going to stop resulting in terrible headlines, which is a problem whoever comes next is not going to have, unless the delegates are somehow stupid enough to pull another dinosaur from below the rug.

    More interestingly: now that Biden has pulled out because he’s patently too old, as it was a concern for plenty of voters, this is a golden opportunity to put the focus on the other candidate whose age is a somewhat less obvious but still noticeable issue.

  • Bumblefumble@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    5 months ago

    This decision really raises my opinion of Biden so much. God damn do I love that man, he is truly a great person who dedicated his life to serve his country, literally. He honestly had a great term given the circumstances, and the only thing he probably should have done differently is to not run for reelection to begin with. But he seemed to genuinely believe he could win and stave off Trump. Now that that seemed impossible, he makes a very courageous decision that a lot of people probably wouldn’t have made and puts the country ahead of his ego. Lots of respect from me, and I hope this reinvigorates the democratic base and makes the future brighter for all of us.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      We can hope. If the media attention is “Democrats are in shambles 3 months before the election” it might not go so well. And Trump will definitely be making a lot of noise about that.

      • lone_faerie
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        5 months ago

        I feel like the Democrats appeared more in shambles with him refusing to drop out. The party was all over the place on their support for him and he was just being a stubborn old man. Now they’ll hopefully all be able to come together and rally behind a single candidate.

      • timestatic@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I hope the Dems will quickly rally behind a new candidate and show more of the bad side of rump in the political debate, not just Bidens age. I think this is a huge chance

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Make the democrats mistakes less existential by introducing competition into the electoral process with Ranked Choice voting.

      More political parties, more chances to beat trump, more people voting.

    • ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Realistically… from a foreigner . They shouldn’t …really… Have to…

      Anybody that votes for trump wants a king. Plain and simple.

      Provided America has a functional education system, the Dems should easily be able to coast against someone that actively tried to retain power in the ways that he did. You can listen to the cals yaknow.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      119
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s really a good move. At this point any person under 70 could mop the floor with trump, he’s still the worst possible candidate from any position, and the GOP has had zero time to poison whoever gets the nomination.

      • cogman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yup. Kamala is also not a bad pick because republicans are almost certainly going to start with racism/sexism as their first attacks “Oh, she’s DEI”. Given trump has been trying to court the black/Latino vote, this will play against him.

        Further, Kamala will be able to excellently push him on abortion. Biden really sucked at advocating for women’s rights even though that’s been a winner pretty much every time it’s been the focus of a campaign (there’s a reason Rs have backed away from mentioning it).

        It’ll still be close and there’s still a lot of unknowns. However, I for one think this is the right move.

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s pretty hard to argue against the same reasoning that pushed Biden off the ticket. He IS too old, and clearly struggling, you put someone in their 40s and 50s across from Trump, he will look as badly as Biden did.

          • ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Well… at minimum to anybody who publicly complained about bidens age.

            Now is there chance to not be a hypocrite. I hope Americans are calling it hypocrites this week. There will be many.

            • Snowclone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Dosen’t matter, if you convince people to say a old candidate who can’t speak reasonably well is absolutely a danger to the country, you aren’t unconvincing them of that now that Trump is the old confused rambler on stage.

              • ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                You don’t have to convince them. You just have to ask them to behave the same way. And if they don’t. Then call them a hypocrite. To their face.

                Good luck!

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        He definitely didn’t have zero chance, nobody knows what his chances would have been. This is all uncharted waters.

    • Kroxx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Fuck yes you mean! I’m joking, I can see how this is scary and it is risky to an extent( although way less than Biden staying in imo). Here is what I would consider about this though as a positive:

      I think this will at least partially reinvigorate the voting population

      I don’t know this of course but personally I haven’t been excited about pretty much anything happening in politics in a while. I am actually excited and they haven’t even picked a new nominee yet. Harris would be my least popular pick but if they pick her I will be way more happy/motivated about voting. I hope this pumps some blood into voter turnout.

      • Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        from the article

        Election law expert Richard Hasen wrote that there is “no credence” to the notion that the Democratic Party could not legally replace Biden on the ticket, as he is not the nominee yet – the nominating process generally takes place during the Democratic National Convention.

  • butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Wait wait, let me guess, now all of the sudden we’re not literally fascists for thinking that it would be best if Biden stepped down. A sincere fuck you too everyone who commented accordingly for the last month.