Looks like someone took some shots at prez candidate Donald Trump at a rally in PA. From the videos I’ve seen, it looks like he did get grazed.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    232
    ·
    4 months ago

    Guess some of those 2nd Ammendment guys might be “trying to do something about it” eh Donnie?

    This is what you get when you preach hate 24/7. This isn’t a gameshow.

  • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    183
    ·
    4 months ago

    Half the comments here are proving that people on the right aren’t the only ones who can indulge in stupid conspiracy theories.

    It’s depressing as fuck.

    • Queue
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      4 months ago

      Q-Anon level thinking that somehow Trump is a mastermind of this. The dude who can’t hide stolen files properly, can’t lie on his taxes properly, and loses money on a casino, somehow has the ability to rig a false flag assassination attempt.

      Are NeoLibs that so far into the Kool-Aid that Dipshit Trump is also a grandmaster 5D chess player of this, while not being able to string words together? It’s not like he’s even been a good actor.

      • Zess@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        4 months ago

        Trump isn’t even the mastermind of his own bowel movements. If this was staged it was all planned by his Russian handlers.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s fun to indulge in, and it doesn’t change the fact that shit is about to hit the fan, regardless of whether the shooter was someone with a legitimate desire or a paid gunman. Trump was just given and used a golden ticket to both rally republicans to vote for him, and to incite his diehard followers into another insurrection.

        • Queue
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sure, but I don’t think being an ironic conspiracy theorist on the levels of Q-Anon is going to make anyone seem better.

          Trump was already going to do that. Trump would do it if someone sneezed on him. They already considered him a martyr. They already wanted/have an Enabling Act. The only thing this changes is a bit less blood in him, and 3 people died. Trump already had higher polling numbers.

          Fascism is here. Get ready.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            It won’t make anyone here seem better, I agree. But at the same time, it’s not like we’re going to have the opportunity to joke around like this after the inevitable happens.

            Enjoy life while you still can, you know?

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        It doesn’t take a mastermind. Dictators faking assassination attempts to garner support isn’t new.

        • Queue
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          “All right ear me big sniper guy, it’s going to be an attempted assassination, the biggest ever, you are going to shoot me close, like danger close but don’t worry I’m the best president, really I’m the best and you are the best sniper, the best sniper in the whole country. So you shoot me near the ear, near enough that blood comes out, I know scary stuff, but we are tough guys, the toughest so you do it and I resist and together we make the best attempted staged assassination ever”

          • Shamelessly stolen from a blog
    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      4 months ago

      What I find sad is that either option is equally plausible. That’s how low we have sunk.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 months ago

        It isn’t though. There is maybe a 0.01% chance that this was a false flag.

        I know what’s happening is hard to swallow, and the ramifications are deeply troubling, but try not to succumb to baseless conspiracy theories.

        There’s plenty of motive. An attendee was killed. The shooter was killed by Secret Service. There’s not really a reason to think this didn’t actually happen, except for cognitive dissonance.

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          0.01% chance based on what?

          I think being unsure either way makes perfect sense. You gotta admit it doesn’t really line up with Trump’s character to be posing for the cameras if he’s actually being shot at. Though tou’re not wrong to say, that that isn’t proof of anything. It’s subjective feeling.

          But, I think saying it’s entirely unlikely this was orchestrated isn’t right either.

          • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Well, a conspiracy requires evidence, and without evidence there’s no reason to treat the conspiracy theory as credible.

            Saying 0% would be unrealistic because there’s always a chance, but if you actually believe that this is a 50/50 toss-up, you’re just delusional and desperate to feel some sense of enlightenment like every other conspiracy theorist moron in the world.

            Given that there is precisely zero evidence of what you are claiming, I’ll estimate as close to zero as I can without pretending it’s impossible.

            But make no mistake, you are deliberately spreading disinformation.

            • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I’m not claiming anything. It’s just really, really early after the event.

              My choice of words was not ideal, and I apologize for that.

              I’m just saying being unsure of what happened isn’t crazy so soon after the event.

              You’re out here saying what is and is not likely based on your own feelings about what you feel is true.

              It’s simply too early to say anything definitive about what level of conspiracy existed (in the traditional sense, of more than one person, conspiring).

              I am not saying this was staged. I’m saying you’re jumping the gun, to say so confidently it wasn’t.

          • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            4 months ago

            Your point is that you think you’re allowed to spread misinformation if that misinformation sounds like it maybe could be true. This is the rationale of every conspiracy theorist ever. You’re not making an intellectually honest point here.

            If your point is that you’re a dishonest person who cares more about narrative than facts, point received.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Not like it really needs proving. When Marx writes about “revolution,” he means bloody, violent revolution.

        Anyone advocating revolution needs guns to back it up or else they’re just full of hot air.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Elections were meant to be bloodless revolutions. Unfortunately with First Past The Post voting, the right options were not available to vote for. But we can change how we vote. We can make peaceful revolution possible with a more representative electoral system.

      • Xtallll
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 months ago

        Antifascists have a long history of shooting Natzi.

        • SeaJ@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not every time at all. Franco, Salazar, and Pinochet were not defeated via guns.

      • PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        “blue maga” implies that there is a cult of personality around Biden like there is around Trump. That is simple not what anyone opposed to Trump believes in or rallies around.

        • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          Funny, because people used that term to describe the “vote blue no matter who” people well before Biden was ever a serious contender in the primaries…

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    161
    ·
    4 months ago

    Mr Trump could be seen ducking for cover behind the lectern.

    I like attempted assassination victims that don’t duck for cover.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I wonder how much we’re going to hear about the poor person who got shot in the head right behind him, or if they’re just incidental margin notes in history, overshadowed by the big WWE media theater that is Trump. Reports are saying at least two crowd members have died.

      edit: the family of the victim has given an update that Trump hasn’t even attempted to reach out to them. And also, the guy was an avid nutcase, nazi and racist. The world won’t be worse-off, we can sleep easy.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh Trump will absolutely bring them up at every single rally to froth up the crowd. Because he may be the martyr they care about the most, but the martyrs who actually died will be great ammunition (I can’t think of a more appropriate word, sorry) to rile up the crowd.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          That is assuming there is another rally, and today’s incident wasn’t just the catalyst for a Jan 6 sequel. Knowing his supporters, I’m not holding my breath, unfortunately.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            4 months ago

            Considering the number of people here claiming this was Trump staging a false flag, I am absolutely certain there are a similarly large number of people on the right saying this was Biden trying to assassinate Trump and something must be done. So I hope not.

            • samus12345@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              Republicans have blamed Joe Biden for the attempted assassination tonight, accusing the president of whipping up opposition to Donald Trump.

              JD Vance, who is one of the frontrunners to be Trump’s running mate, said: “Today is not just some isolated incident. The central premise of the Biden campaign is that President Donald Trump is an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs.”

              “That rhetoric led directly to President Trump’s attempted assassination,” he added.

              Mike Collins, a Republican congressman from Georgia, said: “The Republican District Attorney in Butler County, PA, should immediately file charges against Joseph R. Biden for inciting an assassination.”

              He also tweeted that Mr Biden “sent the orders”.

              • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Prosecuting the president for stochastic terrorism? That’s a precedent they really don’t want to set with Trump as their candidate.

                That they are pushing it is evidence they don’t think they’ll have to follow the rule of law if they win.

                • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  That they are pushing it is evidence they don’t think they’ll have to follow the rule of law if they win.

                  They won’t. The Supreme Court already determined that.

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                All I’m hearing is that they think Biden told the truth and used the power the Heritage Foundation SCOTUS explicitly gave him, and now they’re inexplicably butthurt about it.

            • pivot_root@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Unfortunately, the number is likely going to be a lot higher.

              I’m pretty sure a lot of the people here are (or at least me) are being joking/sarcastic about the false flag conspiracy. For us Lemmings, there’s no emotional stake in these events, whereas his supporters will be angered over anyone even attempting to kill their fascist idol…

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                4 months ago

                I’m pretty sure a lot of the people here are (or at least me) are being joking/sarcastic about the false flag conspiracy.

                I’m not sure of that at all, especially when emotions are running high.

                I’m not absolutely discounting the possibility they they somehow found some schlub to die in a fake assassination attempt, but I’m also not going to come up with conspiracy theories until there’s been some time to go over evidence and analyze the situation.

                • pivot_root@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I’m also not going to come up with conspiracy theories until there’s been some time to go over evidence and analyze the situation.

                  Respect for that. It’s a reasonable and rational response to today’s series of events, despite the temptations of role-playing as a conspiracy theorist to escape from having to think about the hypothetical consequences of said events.

      • Xtallll
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        They chose to go to a rally to support a man who wants to be a “dictator on day one” they made their choice.

  • TipRing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well things are about to get a whole lot worse. That raised fist is going to be printed on all the right-wing crazy stuff and they will use this to justify violence against anyone opposing Trump.

      • finkrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Would absolutely not care about Trump. Would absolutely care about the incensed conservative mob with minimal brain cells, rage and guns starting shit

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Their rage is mostly impotent. When push comes to shove, I think the vast majority of them will stay home and continue posting on Truth Social.

            • catloaf@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              4 months ago

              That was the best they had from all around the country. Mostly thieves and vandals, stealing a laptop and a podium, smearing shit on the walls. Very few actually prepared for violence. If shit went down nationwide, those few violent ones would not be together in one place, so they’d pose far less of a threat.

            • Xtallll
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              One lady gets shot and they break like Lee at Gettysburg.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Unless there is someone to direct that rage, they’ll have no idea what to do with it, or where to direct it.

          • finkrat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            There will always be people that direct that rage, Trump is a cult leader but he’s not the only influencer

            • le cat@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              trump is a fortuitous puppet. he ran for president in the past too, but he didn’t win because the times weren’t right for it.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      You raise a good point. I am far, far less heartbroken by this than Sandy Hook and Uvalde. Republicans made this all possible.

      • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        People keep repeating this, but without convincing justification.

        All I see is, people who were already energized to solidly vote trump, are now really really solidly already going to really vote for him now. I just don’t see how this will get someone to vote trump, who was either going to vote dem or not vote.

        People just say things.

    • Captain_CapsLock@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      128
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s not clear at all that that’s what happened. It is completely plausible that someone would shoot a firearm at a candidate in a hotly contested presidential election. Let wait for evidence to roll in yeah?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          60
          ·
          4 months ago

          So let’s not do what they do and live in an evidence-based world and not an emotion-based one.

          The “facts don’t care about your feelings” party doesn’t care about facts and spends a lot of time on how their feelings are hurt.

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            My evidence (in addition to the weirdness of his reaction, and the convenient blood) - has any article mentioned a shooter being seen/shot/arrested/known to exist? I can’t remember a time where there was a shooting and no article said ANYTHING about a shooter, only about the shots. Nothing could be better for the Trump campaign than for him to be “almost” assassinated.

        • bolexforsoup
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes it would be the case. Should we start behaving like right wing conspiracy theorists now?

    • retrospectology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 months ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised either way, honestly. It would be the right timing for a false flag though for sure.

      But then on the other hand this is the prescribed treatment for tyrants, per our fore-bearers.

      • BugKilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes. You are correct. On reflection I should have put quotes around it as it was intented to convey that but not actually imply that it was the case. It is good you called it out.

  • corus_kt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    4 months ago

    This fucking shooter could set behind democracy in the US for dozens of years. Land the shots and you martyr him, miss and you galvanize his support. Seriously the conservatives were starting to shift away from the far right after Epstein documents and Project 2025. Now deep state wackos will NEVER go away and resort to crazier armed shit. Seeing people comment that the shooter ‘was so close’ is insane and makes them no better than political extremists.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s also a ton of very religious rhetoric being used about Trump now. He’s literally becoming the Messiah and a true religious hero fighting whatever evil is out there. God is saving him from bullets and what not. There’s going to be some interesting sermons in evangelical churches around the country these next few weeks. Yikes.

      • Axxys@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Canadian here.

        Your chance to save democracy comes at the ballot box, not by shooting candidates.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Have “more shots” in the voting booth with Ranked Choice voting. First Past The Post voting artificially limits our magazine size to two shots. We deserve the right to have a standard or even high capacity magazine.

          More chances to stop the Republicans. More chances Republicans would pick a more moderate candidate. More representation. More freedom.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    4 months ago

    if bolsonaro is any indication, this is just turning him into a martyr.

    really terrible job by whoever tried it.