• Reucnalts@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    5 months ago

    As i read “teenage” I thought, it s okay that underage people dont work in a stripclup, but as i saw that she is 19 hadnt problem anymore.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah. They could have used nineteen instead of teenage but that wouldn’t drive the emotion enough.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 months ago

        The Independent is a tabloid and not enough people outside the UK know that or view it that way. I think they see the name and think that has intellectual weight behind it.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Right. They’re adult enough to do it online. It’s arguably better for an 18 or 19 year old to dance in a club than have an OnlyFans. At least after working in a club they can choose to move on to other career options without complete documentation of their previous line of work.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    5 months ago

    I had several under 21 friends pay for college by stripping back in the 90s. If you are cool with it, it seems like a good way to make some decent money and it is generally not something you do as a lifetime career. Let the 19-year-old take her clothes off if she wants.

  • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Conservatives keep lowering the minimum age of workers so we end up with children working in slaughter houses and such but when it’s in the adult industry they raise the age limit. Makes no fucking sense. They don’t like seeing empowered females I guess.

    Also, it’s lame how the headline fails to include the countless other people and entities that are also suing. I hope they win.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s often an alternative way of looking at things that can make seemingly inconsistent positions become consistent. In this case, it’s control. They want to control children and they want to control women’s bodies. How this happens morphs in each situation, but the underlying goal is there.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m not familiar with Florida strip clubs, but if they’re basically a bar (as strip clubs are where I live), I am surprised that staff were ever allowed to be below the drinking age.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      In my state, bartenders (and waiters) can be 18. You can serve and not drink. I thought that was similar in other states

      Edit: same for beer, wine, liquor stores

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      In Florida the laws vary by county, which makes things kind of confusing because one city may allow one thing and a few miles away the rules are different.

      Tampa for example might allow certain acts to take place but not serve alcohol at the same time. There’s clubs with say, an upstairs/downstairs that only serve alcohol on one floor so the other floor can show some skin. It’s all kind of stupid.

      Then you go across the bridge and there’s full nudity, but the food is served outside from a truck.

      Every few years the rules change or DeSantis takes something away. I wish we had freedom in this “land of the free”.