• folkrav@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Too young for the concept of doing work in exchange for something? No, I don’t think so. There’s no minimum age to learn how to do something, for the most part, if the interest is there.

    However, those lower-wage jobs tend to be where a lot of the worker rights abuse tends to happen, and I absolutely think it’s way too young for them to realize if/when it’s happening, or to be in a position to properly defend themselves if they do. Sure, parental guidance and all, but let’s say my experience working with all kinds of parents in day camps, as a ski instructor and in elementary schools, didn’t make me very optimistic about a lot of them really being in a position to protect their children at work.

    I’ve also honestly yet to really see it happening where it has 0 impact on their schooling, but that’s rather anecdotal…

    • Icalasari@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Plus it is going to most affect families too poor to speak up and children of abusive parents who would force them to work

  • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    3 months ago

    Is 13 to young to work? Is 65 too early to retire? Are you spending too much time on hobbies?

    I want to leave this planet.

    • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Isn’t a baby playing with blocks them showing their want to work?

      Subscribe to my LinkedIn for more astute money making tips!

  • MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I started working full time during the summer the year I turned 13. I was working for my family’s company and my safety was always the most important thing.

    In the current environment of the exploration of workers I feel that it is unacceptable for children to work for any company other than a family company or a small company that will not exploit them and that will protect them.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      Agreed in pricipal because family businesses are frequently how knowledge is passed from generation to generation, but family and small businesses can also exploit and not protect children and still need oversight on safety.

  • Kichae@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Are 13 year olds too young to exploit monetarily?”

    “Are 13 year olds too young to take on the glorious privilege of earning their own money?”

    Hey look, it’s propaganda in action, right there on the CBC.

    • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Are 13 year olds too young to exploit monetarily?”

      Is 13 too young to work? A Saskatchewan proposal has reignited debate around kids and labour

      Was it hard to quote the actual headline or is it a matter of making the narrative you are attempting to push stronger?

      Reading the article helps as well.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    How about having a controversial debate about how much companies, corporations and business owners should pay employees in any job in order to make it so that everyone is capable of paying to keep themselves alive, fulfilled and happy.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    “labour shortage”

    When adults are sick and tired of being paid peanuts to work a back breaking 40 to 50 hour job.

    Corporations: So why not look to children who are too inexperienced to understand how much their labour is really worth…?

  • PenguinTD@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    okay, let me ask the real question:

    • do they also get paid at the same standard(minimum wage, benefit, etc) like other worker?
    • do they also get CPP/EI contribution from employer? And can they take EI benefit when laid off?
    • do they also get to contribute to RRSP/TFSA? TFSA is after 18 currently, so they can’t even save their wage compare to other adult workers.
    • when they do perform well, will they get evaluated and promoted the same way? ie, a 15 yo manager at fast food chain and paid the same wage as a manager.
    • rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      I started working at 14 (in Ontario). For my first job:

      • No, there is a “student wage” that is less than minimum wage
      • EI yes, CPP no
      • No
      • Only if there are promotions available at the part-time level (my “promotion” increased my pay by $0.50)

      After 2 years of working there, I got a $0.05 raise. Yes, 5 cents. The biggest increase in my pay came when the minimum wage was increased in Ontario, which also increased the student wage.

      • PenguinTD@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Exactly, without proper protection and equality for same performance/quality of work, it’s just pure exploitation.

      • dankm@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Since this post is about Saskatchewan, I’ll add that Saskatchewan doesn’t have a student wage, just one minimum wage.

        It also happens to be about $1.20 less than Ontario’s student wage. I like my province, but man does it have its issues.

          • dankm@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I would have, but my first minimum wage-type job was after high school. I didn’t make enough to pay into CPP, but I don’t know if that’s a universal truth for younger workers or just because I didn’t work more than 10 hours a week.

            Also fun fact, going back go my original comment about wage: Saskatchewan’s October increase to its general minimum wage won’t catch up to Ontario’s current student wage. Things are cheaper here, yes, but things aren’t (much if any) cheaper in Saskatoon or Regina than in London.

            • rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Is Regina at least better to live in? London is the armpit of Ontario. I hated it there, lol. But there is an excellent shawarma place near the college (Hadi’s).

              Edit: Just found out Hadi’s is closed and there’s a new shawarma place there now. :( Hope Hadi is doing well.

              • dankm@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’m probably not the best person to ask. I’ve never lived in Regina, but from visiting it’s similar to Saskatoon, except it has a man-made lake instead of a nice river valley. It’s a nice enough city, but it’s also clearly a government town. As for London, I’ve never been. I have family there, and part of my family moved to Saskatchewan from London over 100 years ago.

    • psvrh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      “We clearly haven’t made the working class desperate enough yet. Let’s have immigrants and students fight over jobs to make everything even nastier!”

      I’m sure this won’t in any way result in a huge cohort of angry underemployed young people. No siree.

      I’m also starting to think that businesspeople aren’t the Galtian ubermenchen that they think they are, given that they by and large can’t plan more than six months in advance.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Schooling is mandatory until 18. Any other activity has to not interfere with that. Beyond that, do what ye will.

  • pipsqueak1984@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    I was working summer jobs doing farm labour since before I was a teenager (and I’m not that old), so I’m gonna say that it’s fine that 13 year olds are working.

    • dgilbert@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I also had to do farm labour (picking fruit) before I was legally allowed to work at 14. I was taken advantage of (financially) that whole summer - underpaid, and occasionally worked an entire day and got stiffed outright. I’ve never stopped working since then (I’m in my early 50s), aside from a few months of unemployment between jobs that was more stressful than working. I’ll likely have to work until I die.

      Fuck that shit.

      My kids are 18 and 20 and as long as they’re in school, it can stay that way. Once you start, you don’t stop. I’ll let them enjoy it as long as they can.

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Kids already worked in the mines when they were 5 or 6. We should regress to these great time so that the GDP can continue to grow, and shitty employers can continue to pay poverty wages.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I worked at a farm around 12-13 saved enough to quit and buy my first computer, it was awesome. Then 13-14 working at a convienence store. I don’t see an issue working, you learn the actual value of time and money without ma and pa paying for everything. By very early 20s, I owned my own house, cars, motorcycles etc. Kids going from only school life to full time career have a terrible time adjusting to whar that life change is

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        You say no issues while ignoring the exploitation angle, which is historical fact. But even if it weren’t, are we so pathetic that our society somehow needs these kids to work instead of being kids? Really? We can’t do any better?

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          What exploitation angle? I was paid the same minimum wage an adult would get. And as a kid that spent tons of time outdoors with friends, exploring nature, kayaking etc, it really didn’t cut into that, as you were done your shift and still had 5-6 hours of daylight to enjoy the summer. If I wasn’t working I would have wasted that time warching rerun cartoons, you can only swim so much in the pool so much before your skin prunes. lol

          • orcrist@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Right. Please research child labor exploitation and you will understand. It’s clearly documented. Just because you were lucky doesn’t mean others were, or will be.

            • BCsven@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Oh, I know it happens in places, as forced labour, or poor families needing children to work. But I see it as a bonus if your are just a willing participant and paid the equivalent wages. And other countries people have gone into their tradeschool by 16. NA has a delayed entry into real life

              • orcrist@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                If you want to suggest that 16 is a great age to allow people to start work, I don’t think you’re going to find much resistance. That’s true in the United States, and much of the world, as you remarked. But 13 is nowhere close to 16, so that’s where you’re seeing resistance here.

                Another point that I thought it was obvious, but perhaps it isn’t, is how easy it is for older coworkers and bosses to manipulate children. Kids don’t have the experience, and they don’t have the experience or composure necessary to reliably walk away from bad work environments. So then, is there some totally necessary societal function that we desperately need young teenagers to feel? If there’s not, why don’t we take the risk off of them.

                And finally we have to come back to the elephant in the room. In reality, people who propose allowing children to work are doing so because they don’t want to pay adults more.

                And again I think it’s obvious, but maybe it’s not so obvious to others, that if the goal is to give kids a variety of experiences then there are plenty of great ways to do so. Sports, music, school, volunteering, extracurriculars, you name it. Structured environments with proper supervision, managed by people who care about the safety of those kids, and aren’t going to try to make a buck by mistreating them.

                • BCsven@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  All good points, thanks for presenting them. My kids did the sport and volunteer route too, two of them chose to work after graduating highschool, but the other two chose to start early one at 11 delivering papers and the other at 13. They were both open and would alert us if any exploitation was happening, but I recognize some kids may not have the skills. My one daughter found working very enjoyable, a sense of purpose and earning their own paycheck. Annecdotally it set her ahead in life, at 20 she had saved enough and was able to buy an apartment in metro Vancouver…if you know prices here you can see how that is a huge achievement, she still had time for school, friends, movies and sports. For myself I would find that too busy, but some people enjoy it.

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    50+ years ago when I was 12, I got my first job at an ice cream/burger stand making 0.75 cents per hour. The only downside was my creepy old boss who took great joy in pinching my non-existent breasts and child-sized ass.

    2 yrs later I started working at the local pizza joint (legal age to work was 14 back then).

    The real problem these days is owners who would abuse the privilege of having kids work for them. I mean you just know that’s gonna happen, esp under Shmoe’s ‘leadership’.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That is fucked, but I think workers of all ages can be exploited. In my case, working a few different jobs from age 13 to 15 alerted me early to the exploitative behaviour of employers, and I’ve been very diligent in asserting my federal, state, and contractual rights in employment ever since, and to help and insist that co-workers do too.

      In fact, I think this lesson is best learned by child workers, because at that age, the value of the lesson is high, and the potential stakes of asserting ones rights are low, EG as a child, if the child is sacked for asserting their rights, they only lose their pocket money. As an adult out in the wild, this could mean risking their income which pays for rent, family, bills, and other critical expenses.

      • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think you forget that women and children still don’t have enough power, at any age, to deny any man what he wants. They still die doing that, or are beaten within an inch of their lives, or are fired/written up for refusing sexual advances, or are put in situations where they’ve received no training but have to run a dangerous machine anyway.

        That is not something any child should ‘have’ to learn.

        How about instead we crack down on the businesses that do shit like that … maybe 1st offense they lose their business … 2nd offense they lose their life.