I have tried Linux as a DD on and off for years but about a year ago I decided to commit to it no matter the cost. First with Mint, then Ubuntu and a few others sprinkled in briefly. Both are “mainstream” “beginner friendly” distros, right? I don’t want anything too advanced, right?

Well, ubuntu recently updated and it broke my second monitor (Ubuntu detected it but the monitor had “no signal”). After trying to fix it for a week, I decided to wipe it and reinstall. No luck. I tried a few other distros that had the same issue and I started to wonder if it was a hardware issue but I tried a Windows PC and the monitor worked no problem.

Finally, just to see what would happen I tried a distro very very different than what I’m used to: Fedora (Kinoite). And not only did everything “just work” flawlessly, but it’s so much faster and more polished than I ever knew Linux to be!

Credit where it’s due, a lot of the polish is due to KDE plasma. I’d never strayed from Gnome because I’m not an expert and people recommend GNOME to Linux newbies because it’s “simple” and “customizable” but WOW is KDE SO MUCH SIMPLER AND STILL CUSTOMIZEABLE. Gnome is only “simple” in that it doesn’t allow you to do much via the GUI. With Fedora Kinode I think I needed to use the terminal maybe once during setup? With other distros I was constantly needed to use the terminal (yes its helped me learn Linux but that curve is STEEP).

The atomic updates are fantastic too. I have not crashed once in the two weeks of setup whereas before I would have a crash maybe 1-2 times per week.

I am FULLY prepared for the responses demanding to know what I did to make it crash and telling me how I was using it wrong blah blah blah but let me tell you, if you are experienced with Windows but want to learn Linux and getting frustrated by all the “beginner” distros that get recommended, do yourself a favor and try Fedora Kinoite!

edit: i am DYING at the number of “you’re using it wrong” comments here. never change people.

  • aleph@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    6 months ago
    • requires a fair bit of post-installation configuration (suboptimal OOTB experience for newbies)
    • Uses btrfs by default but comes with no snapshots or GUI manager pre-configured for system restore
    • Less software availability compared to Ubuntu or Mint
    • More likely to break than Ubuntu or Mint
    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      6 months ago

      requires a fair bit of post-installation configuration (suboptimal OOTB experience for newbies)

      I’m not the biggest fan of Gnome’s defaults but the regular, non-techie users want a browser (maybe Chrome instead of Firefox, depending on preference) and possibly Steam for gaming. Both are on Flathub, available from Gnome Software.

      Less software availability compared to Ubuntu or Mint

      The software that isn’t available, isn’t of interest to newbie/non-techie users.

      More likely to break than Ubuntu or Mint

      If anything causes breakage, it’s those web tutorials telling inexperienced users to add a bunch of PPAs to do shit. “So you use Ubuntu but video playback is a big laggy on your super new, hardly upstream-supported Radeon graphics card? Easy, add this PPA with untested git snapshots of Mesa and Kernel.” Yeah, no.

    • Jediwan@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      6 months ago

      requires a fair bit of post-installation configuration

      This is crazy to me because of all the distros I’ve tested over the years Fedora Kinote is by FAR the one I’ve had to do the least amount of tweaking with. It’s almost boring how “just works” it is. It’s honestly changed my perspective of what a distro can be.

      • jonno@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        Wait until you try out bazzite for gaming or just the regular kinoite ublue images. Both are basically kinoite with more tweaks and added software on top.

    • poki@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Uses btrfs by default but comes with no snapshots or GUI manager pre-configured for system restore

      False on Fedora Atomic.

      Less software availability compared to Ubuntu or Mint

      Distrobox and Nix exists.

      More likely to break than Ubuntu or Mint

      Mint, perhaps. For Ubuntu, this was only true in the past. And only if PPAs were used sparingly. But Snaps have been a disaster for them in this case. So much so, that even Valve told Ubuntu users to use the Flatpak for Steam instead of the Snap.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    6 months ago

    People generally recommend Debian-based distributions because they tend to be more popular, have more applications designed first and foremost to work on them, and tend to have the most community support because they are more popular.

    • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      This has been my experience. I used Fedora for a while years ago, but rpm was already second fiddle to deb. Plus, I was already selling into my “old man distro” so I kept ending up with some Ubuntu version.

      I did recently Manjaro and Linux Mint, but ended up with Ubuntu again, although this time Kubuntu, Ubuntu with KDE!

      No shade from me though for going with Red Hat.

    • Wolf314159@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve also found that the documentation online is much better, or at least easier to search, with Ubuntu in particular than any other distro. This is probably mostly due to popularity at this point as you said, but I think they got that popularity because of the straight forward and easy to digest documentation. And I’m not just talking about self-help support forums, I mean published and polished wikis and guides hosted by the distro itself.

  • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    6 months ago

    A crash 1-2 times a week sounds very strange no matter what Linux distro you’re using. I would suggest testing your RAM right away, it could be a hardware problem.

    • Jediwan@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s not a RAM problem lmao it rarely crashed on Windows and it’s not crashed with Fedora either.

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        If you did a full memtest and it came out good then OK.

        I’m just saying don’t discount hardware issues. Bad RAM blocks are notoriously hard to diagnose by use alone because there’s not just one symptom you can point at, and they can manifest themselves wildly differently on different apps and different OS depending how large the blocks are and how they are spread.

        Luckily there’s a very simple and straightforward test you can make to put it out of your mind.

      • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Curiously that’s not as accurate as you might think. Different systems use memory differently, even just between different Ubuntu flavors or customizations. 1-2 crashes a week is not normal, unless it was consistently happening when you did something specific. Also, what exactly do you mean by crashing? Did you get a black screen with some error or the computer would just freeze or reboot?

        That being said I don’t think this is likely to be a hardware issue. One thing that comes to mind is maybe swap, did you had swap on Ubuntu and do you have swap on Fedora now? If Linux runs out of memory it freezes, having swap prevents it from doing so, so if you have low enough memory it’s possible that it would get filled up and freeze your system without swap (Windows has the equivalent by default)

      • NoisyFlake@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        That doesn’t mean anything. I once had an issue where every few hours, a random application would crash on Arch Linux, but not on e.g. Debian or Windows. But this wasn’t an Arch issue per se, but was instead related to an UEFI overclock setting (which defaulted to on). After turning it off, everything worked fine.

        So while it seemed like an Arch issue, it was actually hardware/overclock related, it’s just that the other OS wouldn’t run into the trigger for the crash.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Crashes aren’t normal even in Windows. Rare crashes mean a hardware problem 99.7% of the time. Typically RAM as others have pointed out. The only way to figure that out is 4 passes of Memtest86+ without red. Yes 4 because the the first pass is a short one made to spot obviously bad RAM quickly. Less bad RAM might need more. I’ve had a case of 4 sticks that each pass on its own. Every two passed on their own. All 4 failed on the third or fourth pass. And if you think I tested for shits and giggles, I did not. I was see checksum errors on my ZFS pool every other day. No crashes. Nevertheless, if it wasn’t for ZFS I’d have corrupted files all over my archive.

    • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah that’s not a distro’s fault that’s something wrong. I run several machines with a variety of distros and nothing crashes ever, unless I’m testing partially working software.

    • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah that’s not a distro’s fault that’s something wrong. I run several machines with a variety of distros and nothing crashes ever, unless I’m testing partially working software.

  • mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 months ago

    Because on Fedora sometimes you are required to use terminal for some stuff like installing nvidia drivers and you dont really want to send a total beginner to Fedora

    • Jediwan@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      idk I have only needed the terminal once, with Ubuntu/Gnome it was a daily occurrence.

      • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        What were you using the terminal for that now you don’t need it? I personally prefer KDE to GNOME as well, and I think lots of it can be related to that and not the distro itself.

    • twinnie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nvidia can be installed through the App Store (or whatever it’s called) now. You just have to enable the non-OSS repo in the settings.

    • Mars2k21@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’m a little lost here…when I started using Fedora I was pretty much a complete beginner (used Ubuntu a little bit before but not extensively, only GUI applications) and stuff like this wasn’t an issue. Just copy and paste from some online guide. Didn’t have to use the terminal frequently either.

      Fedora is pretty easy.

  • erwan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 months ago

    Unfortunately boring distributions don’t get recommended because users of boring distributions don’t bother commenting on distribution discussions.

    And it’s really unfortunate that obscure distributions have more vocal fans, because boring distributions are much better for beginners.

    • Blaiz0r@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Ironically this is how I feel about Arch, for me it’s worked flawlessly for years.

      I don’t bother getting in ‘discussions’ about using it, because if other people have problems I’m not going to convince them that I don’t.

      • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s mostly the installation and initial setup that’s a pain on arch, so definitely not a beginner distro, but very good nonetheless

        • Blaiz0r@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah totally, I think to use Arch successfully you need an opinion about what your system needs, and that takes experience with using Linux.

          Installation is pretty trivial these days with the install script

  • minibyte@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’m salty on Red Hat and won’t touch anything near it.

    I recommend Zorin because it’s Debian based and I’ve been running Debian Stable for over 20 years. If there’s an issue I can probably help.

    • Jediwan@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve actually tried Zorin and was really impressed! My favorite use of GNOME I’ve seen for sure. Though it’s technically Ubuntu based (which is Debian based).

    • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’m switching to COSMIC on Debian Stable when that becomes an option. Until then, It’s Fedora with Qtile Wayland (and Hyprland as backup).

      Edit: though I have a Debian VM where I’ll try to get Qtile Wayland set up via pipx and document the process so might go to Debian before then.

      • minibyte@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        That’s funny, you’re the second person today to mention Cosmic to me. I hadn’t seen it yet – now I’m interested as well.

        • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I tried the prealpha and it’s missing a few things I want (they’re WIP). I’d suggest checking out some Youtube videos of it, and not to expect too much, as it’s still not there imo.

  • poki@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 months ago

    Why does nobody here ever recommend Fedora to noobs?

    It does happen. It’s simply not the popular choice for the following reasons:

    • Fedora and its predecessors were until relatively recently simply more cumbersome in use compared to Debian and Ubuntu;
      • There was a time (like at least over 10 years ago) in which package managers didn’t necessarily know how to resolve dependencies. However, Debian’s package manager at the time did it earlier than the package manager found on Fedora’s predecessor. Hence, this was a clear reason to prefer Debian or Ubuntu over Fedora('s predecessor).
      • Freezing packages and offering stable releases with two years of support (like Debian does), has been and continues to be a very pleasant way to run your Linux OS. That’s why, even in the past, Fedora’s slower cousin (i.e. CentOS) was very popular (though being RHEL clone didn’t hurt either). Fedora, on the other hand, offers a semi-rolling release cycle of 6 months with only 13 months of support since release. With semi-rolling release, I refer to the fact that some packages are frozen and some are not frozen. Hence, you should expect daily updates. Access to the latest and greatest software is great. However, every update is a possible cause/reason for something to bork/break on your system. It’s therefore unsurprising that some prefer the predictability found on other distros. Though, for the sake of completeness, one has to mention that Fedora Atomic does a great job at tackling this problem; especially the uBlue projects.
      • A couple of years back, Fedora switched in quick succession to systemd, Wayland and GTK4. Thankfully, I didn’t experience this for myself. But, from what I could gather, it was a mess. Users, perhaps rightfully so, questioned Fedora’s decision-making. While Fedora wasn’t particular loved, this didn’t help to retain new users, nor did it help to cultivate a trusted environment.
    • Due to the previous reason, Fedora has not particularly been a very popular distro. Hence, troubleshooting your issues through Google is less straightforward compared to Linux Mint or Ubuntu. Additionally, as Fedora’s user base has primarily been more experienced users compared to the ones found on Linux Mint or Ubuntu, it’s unsurprising to find less discussion on elementary stuff. Simply by virtue of Fedora’s user base already being past that.
    • Fedora, like Debian and openSUSE, offers a relatively bare bones experiences. It does make a lot of sane decisions for you. However, it doesn’t focus on being particularly GUI-friendly or newbie-friendly. By contrast, distros like Bazzite, Linux Mint, Manjaro, MX Linux, Nobara, Pop!_OS and Zorin OS (amongst others), do put thought and effort into streamlining the experience as much as they can; especially for newer users.
    • While Fedora is primarily community-driven, Red Hat’s influence is undeniable. As such, people that hate corporate interest and/or Red Hat and/or IBM will favor the use of Arch and Debian.

    Having said all of that, I’ve been using Fedora Atomic for over two years now. Heck, Silverblue was my first distro. And it has been excellent so far. Furthermore, with Bazzite (based on Fedora Atomic) and Nobara (based on Fedora) often mentioned in conversations regarding beginner friendly distros, even if Fedora itself isn’t explicitly mentioned, the ecosystem is clearly healthy and will continue to flourish.

  • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Long-time Fedora user here. I do not think Fedora is noob friendly at all.

    • Their installer is awful
    • Their spins are really well hidden for people who don’t know they exist
    • The Nvidia drivers can’t be installed via the GUI
    • There’s no “third party drivers” tool at all
    • The regular Flathub repo is not the default and their own repo is absolutely useless
    • AMD/Intel GPUs lack hardware acceleration for H264 and H265 out of the box, adding them requires the console
    • Their packages are consistently named differently than their Ubuntu/Debian counterpart

    I really like Fedora for their newish packages without breaking constantly. I still would not recommend it for beginners.

    • Elven_Mithril@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      What do you mean the installer is awful? I have found it quite straightforward. Select the disc, your keyboard setup, timezone and then it install itself…

      • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        It caters to a middle ground that barely exists, meaning it doesn’t have enough options for a power user and too many for a newcomer.

        For example, a newcomer doesn’t know what a root account is and doesn’t have to care, yet they have to choose if they want to enable or disable the account. They can also remove their administrator privileges without knowing what it means for them. I get asked what a root account is every time somebody around me tries to install Fedora.

        I recommend spinning up a Ubuntu 24.04 VM and taking a look at their installer.

        They have a clear structure on how to install Ubuntu step by step while Fedora presents you everything at once. They properly hide the advanced stuff and only show it when asked for it. They have clear toggles for third party software right at the installer and explain what they do. Fedora doesn’t even give you the option to install H264 codecs or Nvidia drivers.

        It also looks a lot cleaner and doesn’t overload people with too much info on a single screen. And yet it can still do stuff like automated installing and has active directory integration out of the box, where the Fedora installer miserably fails for a “Workstation” distro.

        The Fedora installer works, but it doesn’t do much more than that and the others do it better in many areas.

        • NinjaCheetah@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Don’t even get me started on disk partitioning. I feel like they somehow have the most obtuse partitioning setup out of every distro I’ve ever installed. It feels like if you don’t just hand over your whole disk (which, if you do that, I feel like it doesn’t make it clear how it’s going to partition it), the installer gets very spiteful and just goes “fine then, figure it out”. I’ve never had so much trouble manually partitioning a disk before, I would literally rather just use fdisk lol.

        • verdigris@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          If you’re installing an OS you should absolutely understand what the root account is. That’s like buying a car without understanding the concept of keys.

          • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            No, it’s like buying a car without understanding how the engine works, which a lot of people do.

            • verdigris@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              That’s absurd. You don’t need to understand the inner workings of the kernel to know what a root account is. If you’re regularly encouraging people to install a new OS when you aren’t even confident in their ability to understand what a root account is, you’re not doing them any favors.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Half of your complains are fixed in newer releases. For instance it asks you if you want to enable third party repos. If you hit yes it enables the repo for chrome, Nvidia and others plus it setups stock flathub.

      • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        That only applies to the GNOME variant, the KDE spin is missing the third party repo toggle.

        At least the Flathub repo is fixed on the GNOME variant now. The Nvidia repo is added but the driver is not installed, meaning you still need to use the CLI to install the drivers.

        https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/NVIDIA

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Their packages are consistently named differently than their Ubuntu/Debian counterpart

      I agree with all your points, but this one has way more to do with Debian being a bunch of weirdos about how packages are packaged. Its really more of a Debian demerit than anything since sometimes their packaging practices can be somewhat hostile to projects not directly associated with Debian, especially since the Debian community can have a certain “Our way is the only right way” attitude. That said, the Debian packaging standards can make it easier as a developer to experiment with creating a software package to interact with an existing package. Like there’s a reason to do it that I can support and I wish Debian packagers would more often say “we package things like this so people can experiment” instead of “Everyone else does packaging wrong and our way is the only way”

    • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Completely agree. I mean, I’m what you’d call a power user, and I still opt for using a flatpak for my browser (Floorp) because codecs are a pain.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 months ago

    When the time came to pick which boring old man distro to use, the people who picked and would recommend fedora all got jobs supporting rhel. They don’t have time or energy to devote to computer touching when they get home from their serious business jobs making sure the computer keeps increasing shareholder value.

    Fedora is very good.

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    I wouldn’t be confident in recommending Fedora to noobs, because its a distribution that is on the bleeding edge side. But it depends on what type of noob we are talking about. There are noobs in Linux, who are technically well versed in Windows and have no problem in adapting to a new system. If someone wants to have the newest software, then Fedora might be it.

    Also not many people have experience with Fedora, therefore less likely to be recommended. Most people use or used Ubuntu, maybe even started with Ubuntu. You or me may not like it, but its proven that Ubuntu is generally a good choice for newcomers to get into Linux. And that also plays into how many people know and are able to help. In contrast, Fedora is too much of a niche.

  • Luna [she/her]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    I do, Fedora is simply the best and meets the most use cases. It combines good privacy and security out of the box with a clean UI (at least with Workstation and KDE spin) while having a package manager that’s easy to learn and easy access to Flathub and up-to-date apps (can’t stress this enough, even windows and Mac keep apps up to date and don’t hold them back for the sake of LTS (sorry Workstation Debian fans). It also brings in newer and better technologies without breaking almost anything (at least for me).

    This is just my opinion though, I know people like to reccomend Mint but I personally do not like it, and despise it’s desktop options (I am one of the people that do not and never have liked Cinnamon).

  • cevn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Just finished moving all 3 of my computers to Fedora and WOW it is so good compared to ubuntu. I was missing out. Everything is working on both AMD and Nvidia, even wayland.

  • RedNight@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve been having a tough time with it. Maybe I’m unlucky with my hardware and setup. Spend hours this week recovering from a black screen after upgrading to F40. Issue with Plymouth + Nvidia + Luks at boot. Also getting Nvidia to work on F39, my first install. Secondary computer (laptop) macbook 2017, keyboard doesn’t work with Fedora compared to Linux Mint.

    I’d recommend Linux Mint for beginners after my experiences. imho

    • poki@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nvidia can be a bitch. And it’s unfortunate that Fedora isn’t particularly well known for handling that graciously.

      I’d recommend Linux Mint for beginners after my experiences.

      Absolutely fair. FWIW, if you ever feel like giving Fedora another chance, consider doing it through its derivative (i.e. Bazzite).

      • Norah - She/They
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Thanks for the recommendation, I just installed Bazzite. Had been trialling LMDE but found it frustratingly lacking. No Driver Manager on that edition made NVIDIA drivers a nightmare. Meanwhile that’s handled in Bazzite and it has a shortcut to install Moonlight? Awesome.

        • poki@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          You’re welcome 😊!

          I agree that Bazzite is very very good. So much so, that it’s the first distro I recommend in person.

          Enjoy 😉!

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            One of these days, I’ll have to give Universal Blue a look for general computing. Bazzite is excellent, but I don’t imagine my MiL is going to care about having Steam and gamescope installed out of the box, should I ever have to do a fresh install for her.

            • poki@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              I understand. And to be frank, I agree with you that perhaps it’s too much focused on a particular set of things (i.e. gaming).

              There’s also Aurora and Bluefin (see uBlue’s website) for those that seek a very similar experience but without the focused-on-gaming part. The reason I prefer Bazzite over those two is related to Waydroid (i.e. software to run Android (apps) on Linux). However, your mileage may vary.

              Finally, uBlue used to dedicate resources and documentation on their base images; i.e. relatively not-opinionated images for Silverblue, Kinoite and Fedora Atomic with basically any desktop environment you could imagine plus hardware enablement. These are perhaps still worth considering. However, personally, I’ve been having a better time on Aurora/Bazzite/Bluefin.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Things should get a lot better with NVIDIA soon in distros like Fedora that want to stick with only open software.

  • nyan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    Because distros from the Debian family are more popular, any random help article aimed at beginners is likely to assume one of those distros. (If you know how to map from apt to rpm, you’re probably not a beginner.) Plus, I don’t trust Red Hat, who have a strong influence on Fedora.

    (Note that I don’t generally recommend my own distro—Gentoo—to newcomers either, unless they have specific needs best served by it.)

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not implying anything, but why don’t you trust Red Hat? Because they’re a big company, or because of some other reason?

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Not the original commenter but Red Hat took steps a few months ago to make it harder to make complete bug-for-bug clones of their Enterprise product ( RHEL ). Basically, they stopped providing the exact build instructions and exact patch sets ( SRPMS ) to their competitors. You now have to jump through more hoops to do it ( like Rocky does ) or you have to fork your own Enterprise distribution from CentOS Stream ( like Alma now does ).

        You still get everything you always did as a Red Hat subscriber ( even if you do not pay them — they have a free tier ). All the actual software is still Open Source for everybody ( subscriber or not ) and available free in CentOS Stream and Fedora. Red Hat is still one of the biggest contributors across the Linux ecosystem and, ironically, one of the biggest proponents and providers of GPL software in particular.

        However, if you are a Red Hat subscriber and you share the RHEL SRPMS, Red Hat may not renew your subscription. That is their big evil move.

        Many people did not like this change and the most extreme detractors have accused Red Hat of betraying Open Source or of even trying to take Linux proprietary. In my view, this is totally wrong. Read my second paragraph.

        What many people do not seem to understand is that Red Hat founded the Fedora Project and, much later, the CentOS Stream Project explicitly to be open, community distributions so that they ( Red Hat ) could pursue their commercial interests with RHEL without friction from the community. I say people do not understand because some people now say they do not trust Fedora to stay Open when the entire reason it exists is to be that ( as an explicit strategy of Red Hat ).

        One of the things that is annoying ( to me ) about Fedora is that it insists on being completely anti-commercial ( avoiding patented codecs for example ). The idea that Fedora is for businesses or will be “taken over” by IBM is silly. Red Hat employees have always been the biggest contributors to Fedora. It has always been Free ( as in freedom ).

        The most extreme damage Red Hat may eventually do to Fedora is to stop paying so many people to work on it and the important packages it relies on. That has not happened and probably will not anytime soon ( in my view ).

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Thank you for the history lesson! I can see why their decision might chafe some people or cause them to be a bit more wary (given that many of us live in an end-stage-capitalism hellscape), but as is often the case, real life details are usually mundane.

          I’ve personally been impressed by their Atomic distros, and they’ve come a long way since I first tried vanilla Fedora with Gnome many years ago.

      • nyan@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Red Hat’s interests often don’t seem to be aligned with those of the average user. The result is that they push for the adoption of software and conventions that make things better for businesses running RHEL, but worse for almost everyone else. This goes back a long way, and makes me question the long-term suitability of any distro Red Hat is involved in for any user who is not paying them for support. It’s the pattern that bothers me, not any single event (and yes, part of that pattern does arise from the fact that they’re a for-profit corporation).

        It’s the sort of thing that many people won’t really care about, and if the alternative was Microsoft or even Canonical (which is prone to weird fits of NIH and bad monatization ideas), then fine, I would go with Red Hat. Still, I would recommend a community distro above anything that a corporation has its fingers in.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          TBH, Red Hat focusing their attention on business isn’t that problematic for me. RHEL is specifically for businesses, and Red Hat needs to make money to keep operating. Kind of a necessary evil, if you could consider that evil. However, I completely understand why the capitalist realm makes average people squirm.

          But that said, I usually prefer community projects myself (Fedora spins included), since they tend to have modified setups that are more in line with what regular users would want or need.

  • psmgx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    Newer, less stable packages. I’ve been on Fedora as a daily driver since 2009 and have had yum updates break things. I do RHEL full-time so I’ve got the know-how to unravel it, but it’s not for the noob / non-technical, at least not at first.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve been on Fedora as a daily driver since 2009 and have had yum updates break things.

      Ah yes, when yum was the package manager, you had some breakage. As context for the readers here: dnf replaced yum in 2015, almost a decade ago: https://lwn.net/Articles/640420/

      I do RHEL full-time so I’ve got the know-how to unravel it, but it’s not for the noob / non-technical, at least not at first.

      Also, “noob / non-technical” users just use Gnome Software and not command line package managers.