• Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 months ago

    Makes me wonder why there is no barrier installed to block the path when a train is coming. That sort of thing is all over the place in countries with robust rail travel. It seems like a well-defined crossing so it’d be a no-brainer to install one there.

    • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      A) It’s a tram

      And

      B) No there isn’t, they share the roads with everyone else

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think it’s just a street. So it’d be like installing a barrier on the pavement.

      • Sasha
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s true, this appears to be a light rail crossing. But then again that’s a pretty large station for just light rail so I’m not sure.

        Where I live there are generally no gates for light rail but there are for all pedestrian crossings over ordinary train tracks, which honestly just makes me think we probably should be installing more safety measures for light rail.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Part of the reason why Boston transitioned from streetcars to the subway is how many people died each year after being hit by them. There is definitely no reason in the modern day why rail needs to share space with pedestrian traffic, and protections should be in place in any area where they intersect.

          • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            trams at street level are convenient though

            also costs much less than grade separating everything

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    Don’t wear headphones while crossing roads, bike lanes, or train tracks. :P

      • britishblaze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah that’s my main takeaway, you should also not be listening at a volume that makes you unable to hear a car horn or a bicycle bell.

    • Talaraine@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Honestly I don’t know why people wear headphones at all outside. I mean, I get we should all be able to hear our tunes or podcasts or whatever, but unawareness of your surroundings can change your life for the worse very quickly.

      I seem to recall an ad for some product in the last couple years that still lets you hear what’s around you with clarity while listening, though I can’t seem to find it now.

      Edit: Maybe these? https://www.cnn.com/cnn-underscored/electronics/sony-linkbuds-earbuds-hear-your-surroundings

      The reviews are iffy on them though. idk, I just don’t want noise cancellation until I’m someplace I’m going to be sitting in a long time that has sounds I don’t want to hear.