Edited to be slightly more fair to people complaining that they don’t think genocide is good just fine
This guy does literally nothing but tell people how Democrats are awful people (and implies you shouldn’t vote for them)
TONS of posts like that.
I really wouldn’t be surprised to find out he’s Russian.
No-one is supporting genocide. If people don’t vote for Biden (and even if they do, the popular vote might not be enough), Trump will win.
The only case where saying “don’t vote for Biden” would be if Trump was actually a better, smarter, more emphatic president, and would use the US’s power to instantly stop helping Israel.
And who exactly thinks that’s even possible in any scenario or even parallel universe?
Not voting for Biden would be like being a pro-Hitler British person in 1939.
deleted by creator
“Churchill is a war criminal and a drunk, we’re better off appeasing Hitler!” - you as a Brit in the 30’s
deleted by creator
You’re really bad at this, you know?
You’re literally helping elect a fascist leader. And you don’t have a defense, because you’re doing it on purpose, which is also why can’t even mention it.
You’re literally covering for one yourself
Voting for Biden without trying to tell him he needs to stop supporting genocide will likely still result in him losing.
Weird how you didn’t deny being a Russian instigator stoking division among progressives.
Because it’s both unfalsifiable and deeply unserious
Yeah, sure. That’s the reason.
It’s just completely out of the realm of possibility to prove that you’re not a Russian troll. /megasarcasm
Where’d you live?
Does it concern you a little bit, though, that I’m really American and there might be a lot more who think like me?
Fine, assume I’m a Russian troll if you want, but it’d be smart to at least pretend that there’s a small possibility of there being a low turn out, and you should have a plan on how to address that.
Removed by mod
What do you mean that doesn’t make sense?
Biden’s approval is trash no matter what i’m doing here. There are voters that are already going to sit this out that need convincing; either you need to convince them to show up anyway (hold their nose to genocide to prevent more genocide), or you need to convince Biden that his position on genocide is a losing one (it looks like it already is)
In 2016 Hilary lost because voters didn’t think the establishment gave a shit about their concerns, if you don’t think that’s a risk again all hope is lost.
Removed by mod
Why is it that when I point to the reality of the situation, suddenly I’m a troll?
Bidens approval is at 38% right now, how many votes do you think that equates to?
I don’t know what kind of campaign could make up that kind of deficit without a total about face.
I did that. I’m also going to vote against more genocide, done not just abroad but at home.
In the voting booth, there is no “no genocide” button. Your choices come down to “more genocide” and “less genocide”, and you get to push towards one outcome or the other.
Personally, I’m going to take a brave stance against “more genocide”, but if your principles keep you from engaging with the real options, well.
I’m sure the people who die who wouldn’t have otherwise will forgive you.
I’m not worried about what I do in the voting booth, I’m worried about the 1.3% margin Biden won by in 2020
deleted by creator
if you vote for biden, you are voting for genocide
that seems kind of objectively true to me
you don’t pick and choose which policies your candidate’s vote goes towards it counts for all of them
If you vote for Biden, you are voting to limit Israel’s genocidal warfare.
Lmao yes that is how I’d describe him obstructing the ICCs prosecution of it
I could obstruct the ICC with a wet paper bag ;)
But that’s business as usual- he’s still the only thing limiting Israel’s genocidal warfare, not that you really care about Palestinian lives or anything.
Why does anyone believe he’s doing anything to limit jack shit? Every time someone so much as bats an eye at Israel he puts out a statement condemning antisemitism
Do you know what ‘limit’ means? I’m curious how you’re struggling with this concept.
Do you know who the candidates are? Who the other guy is?
The person whos promised to remove all climate actions and regulations on day one. A guy who is taking dick from Putin every night while screaming “harder daddy”. A drooling megalomaniacal diaper wearing fascist, who supports Putin and Netanyahu.
You’re not voting for genocide. You’re not even voting for Biden. You’re voting against Trump.
If you’re an American with the right to vote and you don’t vote Biden, you are directly supporting Trump, Putin, Netanyahu and other far-right leaders.
Have you ever heard of the trolley problem? You’re online, so you should have. Do you know what’s never the answer to those problems? “I walk away but also take no responsibility for allowing more people to die.” Sorry, not an option. The lesson is that inaction is a choice with consequences.
The trolly problem conceptualized a situation where there is no one on train who can pull the breaks
Bidens on the train. He could pull the breaks.
deleted by creator
Yup. These people honestly think… or, “honestly” think- that not voting is going to actually do something.
Now we have two scenarios to address here:
One:
They actually think in good-faith, that they are going to make a change. To emphasize- they actually think that doing nothing will cause something to happen. Which means… they are entirely unaware that someone will be elected with or without their help.
And-
Two:
They know damn well that a non-vote will help Trump and that is why they are here. There is clearly more evidence to support this being the case as you’ll never see them on any post critical of Trump, suggesting that people not vote for him. Nor do you see them arguing that Trump wouldn’t be a worse choice. Nope. They’re dead silent on the issue.
They don’t need to actively support Trump, or suggest people vote for him here as they know there are very few supporters of his on lemmy.
However, they DO know that conservatives show up to the booths to vote. In DROVES. All they need is to convince a small amount of people to stay home, and their boy wins the White House.
One of these two are correct. The problem is that everyone loses either way- and they don’t care.
No one is arguing a little genocide is good. They’re arguing that a lot of genocide is clearly worse. This seems obvious, but I’m constantly surprised how fucking stupid people are.
They are not stupid; they are deliberately misunderstanding.
I feel a little bit silly even trying to “explain” this like there will be anyone who’s informed by it, but no one here is pro genocide. I would be surprised if you could find 5 people on Lemmy ever who said that genocide is good if done by Democrats, or at any other time.
Here is where to find a protest; go there and meet some new friends, do what you can to stop the genocide. How to do it, I don’t really know, but posting on Lemmy about not voting for Biden will not accomplish it for a couple of different reasons.
They are not stupid; they are deliberately misunderstanding.
Lot of column A, little of column B.
“Go to this place and keep your protest away from my peaceful politics-free community.”
It is certainly not the case that people here need any encouragement to be louder about not wanting their candidate supporting genocide.
I edited it for the both of you to make if more fair, hopefully you don’t still take issue with the framing
You claim that I think genocide is fine, and then hope I don’t take issue with the framing?
This is a very bizarre conversation
I’m not saying you think it’s fine, i’m saying you need to convince no-genocide voters that it’s at least acceptable.
It’s not acceptable. There are a lot of people arguing that it is not genocide, but there are zero people arguing that any genocide is acceptable.
Acceptable in exchange for less of it?
I’m really trying to work with you here. You are all here spending time on communicating something, what is it you’re trying to do by it?
If it isn’t to convince people on the fence about Biden because of his support of Israel, what is it exactly?
I edited it for you
I typed part of a response but honestly what’s even the point
Here is how to find a protest in case it is useful to any of the 100% of Lemmy people who think that genocide is neither good nor fine
I put the link the body of the meme, too.
👍
Removed by mod
Does that really change which button you would press here? I’m a little worried
What if the buttons were (and kinda are) “Palestinian genocide with survivors” or “Palestinian and Ukrainian genocide with no survivors”?
If your willing to accept a little genocide in exchange for not having to convince anyone of anything, sure
Wait actually is this you convincing no-genocide voters that a little genocide is fine? Woa that was slick!
Oh yeah *just *convince the Democrats. Sure thing, I’ll have it done by Tuesday. Honestly I feel stupid for not thinking of just convincing them. Why has no one tried this before? /S
Good luck convincing enough people that a little genocide is fine to win against trump.
Thanks. I really need it, since when Trump wins he’s going to expand the current genocide, then start a new one that will target me.
Believe me, I’m not rooting for it (or don’t, Idgaf).
Democrats are more principled than Trump voters though, if one party can survive running on it it’s not the democrats.
What is a ‘little genocide’? I thought your whole shtick was that genocide was genocide and ‘less’ is still genocide.
Are you conceding that there are degrees and less is better than more?
Are you conceding that there’s a choice between convincing people genocide is ok vs convincing democrats it’s not, and you’d prefer the former?
Voting is the only binary choice. You can do whatever other ‘choices’ you’re babbling about at the same time if you want.
That’s not a terrible idea actually, work it from both ends.
Unless you care about the substance of the issue, but if not then go nuts.
Or let Trump win and get twice as much genocide. That’s way more bang for your buck!
weird how that’s not a button already, did you want me to add to for you? I didn’t think it would be one you needed.
Yeah go ahead and add a third button labeled “Double Genocide with Trump” to the meme- that would actually make it pretty funny.
And then a guy who’s banging it over and over again while saying “I will NEVER support a genocide”
(It is way more than double btw. Not that numbers are the point, but way more than 70,000 people died who didn’t need to just from Trump fucking up the Covid response, and you can add in Kurds or Ukrainians if you need it to tick the Genocide Region of France box, and that was before co-opting the military and preventing it from giving the strong push back they did the last time around)
If you think this meme is saying “genocide is fine, actually” I have no idea what to tell you.
It’s been a while since I’ve seen the Chewbacca Defense bad-faith arguing technique: Say something so nonsensical that it’s difficult to even arrive at a response without being tainted yourself by the incoherence.
I’m not sure what is incoherent about campaigning for a position.
It would certainly be easier than trying to convince anyone of anything, if that’s your preference
Yeah I prefer funny memes. Go ahead and make that change.
I honestly tried, but the text was too small to read i thought someone might hit a button they didn’t intend
Sounds like a skill issue. Maybe take a tutorial.
Here’s my attempt, please excuse the commentary
Dude! Nice man you built there. Really slick. What’s it made of? Oh? Straw?
Cool cool. Lightweight. Organic. Biodegradable! No downsides to that I’m su—
HOLY SHIT
Holy shit holy shit it’s on fire. The straw man! It’s burning! Your poor man of straw! It couldn’t stand up to the heat of even a little interrogation!!
Ugh. I’m shocked about this! Apalled. No one could have predicted this, no one.
I am so sorry for your loss. It must be truly a blow. Well, take care now. I usually block accounts like these. :)
This…… was fucking beautiful. Bravo!
I’m glad I didn’t rile you too much
Jesus, you again.
Never been more thankful for a block function. This clown is bad for all of us.
I’m tempted, but it’s also important to address propaganda as it appears.
Fair, I will continue to use my buttons to push this content out of view.
There is no war in ba sing se.
I have their entire instance blocked. It’s a train wreck
How apropos that you would choose a picture of a character who is insane and wants to murder people to respresent yourself.
Insanity is banking on voters turning out for the least popular incumbent in living memory just because the other one is worse
Tell me you’ve never met an American without telling me you’ve never met an American
Insanity is assuming that doing nothing will create change.
Lmao LOOK AT HOW MUCH NOTHING I’M DOING
Weird how now none of the buttons involve what you’re choosing to do right now
Well, sweetheart, under FPTP voting there are only two options.
I’m going to choose the one that minimizes harm.
I mean that’s not actually true
But I get your meaning, and personally call are way too comfortable with the options available to you
I don’t like the options available to me, but unfortunately which options I get are out of my control.
You’re still choosing Trump, even if you argue with Joe biden in the shower about Gaza while you do it.
deleted by creator
Welcome to a two party system. You don’t get good options, you get to vote against the worst option.
I mean, if you really, genuinely think Trump is a better option, then stay home/vote for him, I guess.
LOVING that ratio! Lemmy is turning for the better!
Yeah! Maybe if if they add the votes on this post to the election results, Biden won’t even NEED to win Pennsylvania, Wisconsin OR Michigan! Could you imagine??
Oh look! It’s a .ml’er come to spread their…. “wisdom?” I’m surprised there’s no memes and emojis though.
Your sarcasm doesn’t change what I said being true. It just makes you look bitter.
Yea but you’re TALKIN about it, amirite?
For what it’s worth, I totally agree. We’ve "lesser evil"ed our way into voting for genocide, the greatest evil. Sorry that things are going to get worse under Trump, but there is a 0% chance that I vote for either of the genocide candidates, even if one is worse than the other. Democrats will have to lose elections until they field an anti-genocide candidate for the presidency (I can’t believe that’s a qualification now).
Democrats will have to lose elections until they field an anti-genocide candidate for the presidency (I can’t believe that’s a qualification now)
Everyone here feigning outrage are pretending as if the democrats don’t have a huge turnout problem this year, and I’m worried they have no interest in advocating to fix that problem except rhetorically dancing around their candidate’s hugely unpopular policies
