• Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    8 months ago

    Jesus. We’ll never hear the end of it from the right wing wackos. They’ll use this as justification for starting up the Nazi Youth

    • Catoblepas
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not like they weren’t going to do it anyway. They’ll always use LGBT+ people and women existing and wanting to be full members of society as justification for whatever they pull.

    • stembolts@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      O no, they changed the name of an organization I was never a part of and know nothing about.

      I will now complain to every white stranger I come across.

      PoV of white bald guy, they always think I’m on their team unless I’m dressed “flowery”. Then they just assume I’m gay and don’t talk to me. If I’m wearing camo tho? Best friend.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      8 months ago

      Your article is from 2014. 10 years ago all of your other checks were NO as well. I can’t find anything recently about atheists with a quick search, just old stuff like that.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s still a core part of their membership:

        https://www.scouting.org/

        Scout Oath “On my honor I will do my best to do my duty to God and my country and to obey the Scout Law; to help other people at all times; to keep myself physically strong, mentally awake, and morally straight.”

        More:

        https://blog.scoutingmagazine.org/2018/05/31/bsa-reaffirms-duty-to-god-aspect-of-all-programs-through-resolution-adopted-at-2018-national-annual-meeting/

        https://dutytogodbsa.org/portfolio/what-does-duty-to-god-mean/

        • nxdefiant@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          it is, BUT, if you read between the lines of the requirements, there’s plenty of room for pragmatic atheists (in pragmatic packs/troops). It’s not perfect, but overall Scouting has absolutely embraced inclusiveness.

          • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            8 months ago

            Not when you’re interviewing for your Eagle they haven’t. Describing how you serve your higher power is still a question at the final interview before receiving it. Either you lie as an atheist, or you tell the truth and don’t get your Eagle. So either violate what it’s supposed to mean to be a scout (integrity and honesty) or you throw away what you’ve worked so hard for for years.

            And that’s ignoring the fact that many troops are hosted via churches, especially in southern areas.

            • jh34ghu43gu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Maybe a regional/troop thing or my memory is failing me? My interview in 2017 (Iowa) didn’t have a religious question in it iirc; there was a question on how I’d be giving back to my community. Don’t think my interviewers were extremely religious though.

            • nxdefiant@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              I can’t argue with that, but I’d have no qualms about “lying” about a ‘‘make believe’’ thing anyway. Tons of kids get their religious award and then never step foot in a church again. It would be very nice if kids could be honest about it though, even just picking a religion to earn the reward for as an academic exercise should be allowed I think learning about how much of a part religion can play in people’s lives, how it affects their judgement, is a good thing for a person to learn about, and perhaps that’s the final test. Respecting the requirement for the sake of the ceremony maybe. Even a (respectful) atheist would take their hat off in a place of worship if asked to.

            • olympicyes@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              They would only ask that in a religious troop. There are plenty of troops charted by secular organizations that won’t ask about that.

            • nxdefiant@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Very true. Sadly, probably not something they’ll budge on any time soon, but then again it’s a volunteer organization, so maybe there’s hope.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            if you read between the lines

            A big part of Scouting, at the organizational level, is fund raising. Without funds, you can’t afford the uniforms or the events or any of the things that make Boy Scouts a social group.

            Historically, the Mormon Church has been a major contributor and facilitator of Boy Scout troops, particularly through the American Midwest and Southwest. Catholics and Methodists are other large scale feeders for the organization. Yes, you can read between the lines. But show up with your “pragmatic atheist” merit badge, and you’re not going to be particularly well received by other troops who came up through religious organizations.

            Jews and Muslims haven’t have it particularly easy integrating with the Boy Scouts, either.

      • Zanothis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        If they haven’t made a public statement that they’ve stopped excluding atheists, why should anyone assume they’ve changed their policies?

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      Start a 4-H Club. They’re run by state universities, so they’re subject to all their policies involving inclusivity and each club is centered on a specific topic. Want a camping/outdoor life club? Easy. Doesn’t have to be Ag related.

      • Eiim
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        As a former 4-Her myself, the 4-H extension office in our region is run by a state university, but the clubs themselves are community-organized. Also, many clubs in our area were general, so you could do any topic covered by the extension office and be a part of the club.

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I lied as a scout too.

      We-Blows? No thanks. You blows. I’m just here for that campfire smell on my school clothes during the weekdays.

    • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      8 months ago

      The article addresses this - they’re admitting gay troop leaders and scouts, as well as girls. The article doesn’t mention anything on the atheist front, but as a member of team rainbow who went through scouting in the 70s and 80s, these are massive changes and I’d honestly be surprised if the org went to court over atheism.

      • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        8 months ago

        IIRC they’ve previously fought in court for the right to exclude atheists.

        No recent court cases because private organizations are allowed to discriminate.

        • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          They did the same for LGBT until recently.

          Being a private organization does not grant you an unlimited right to discriminate, no matter how much the right likes to pretend it does. That’s why anti-discrimination laws exist. There’s loopholes orgs have tried to use, and protections vary by state, but just being a “private organization” doesn’t mean “do whatever prejudicial thing you want.”

          Like I said, I don’t see this current iteration of the org fighting atheists in court.

    • Hello_there@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      All a kid has to do is say ’ I believe in a higher power’s and that’s that. Doesn’t even have to lie if he means ‘newtons third laws’ as the power

      • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        8 months ago

        We should not be encouraging kids to lie in order to join an organization dedicated to building moral character.

        The lesson is that moral character comes from within and not from authority figures.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Of course, we should never encourage kids to lie.

          Now when it comes to leveraging the power of creative reasoning, flexibility of interpretation, and nuance of language - that’s an advanced rhetoric merit badge right there.

          Semantic gymnastics, like moral character, comes from within ✨

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        My higher power is the fucking sun: Sol. He’s the highest power any of y’all gonna see.

        Which is also why I never made it past Star Scout: why advance past the best?

      • awesomesauce309@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Maybe if you take it as written but it will always be enforced unequally. In my rural ass troop there was a very heavy christian implication from scout leaders, and my parents. They didn’t end up forcing me to say it, but it was a very uncomfortable day of adults I was supposed to be able to trust repeatedly pressuring me to publicly announce my belief and helplessness in the face of a fairy tale. Not the only day I was religiously pressured either.

  • BabyVi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    To be honest I never expected the BSA would attempt to reform itself as much as it has. I was in a very homophobic troop, a scoutmaster of mine vented to my grandma that all the queer people ought to be put up against the wall and shot. I’m glad things are improving but I don’t think I’ll ever see the organization in a positive light.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      Their numbers are declining, which means revenue is declining. So the more inclusive they become, the more money they can make. It’s been an ongoing issue even before COVID hit (which hurt a lot of troops and packs).

      • spamfajitas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        Also surprisingly/unsurprisingly a ton of reform suddenly took place the moment the Mormons jumped ship and gave up leadership.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I can’t speak to the Mormon exodus. That was before my time. But yes, they’ve gone through a lot of reforms from what I’ve heard from the long-timers; and from all of the training (e.g., YPT, two-deep leadership, etc) I had to do.

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    Good. I’m slightly less embarrassed to be an eagle Scout now, though I was already the worst Eagle Scout ever, y’know, apart from the evil ones.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I moved before I could complete an eagle scout project but still had a blast in my extremely dysfunctional troop. Good life lessons for sure.

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Dysfunctionalchaos is pretty fun. Dysfunctionalarmy and Dysfunctionalabuse are less so.

        I just barely pulled it off, and only because my Marine-veteran dad decided to become the scoutmaster when I was 16 and still had Star, Life, and Eagle left to complete. All of my good scouting memories are from before then, though, because it was just camping and hanging out with your friends, with enough supervision and structure that nobody got killed.

  • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    So is there a point to the Girl Scouts now? What are they going to do? Start accepting boys? Or try to widen their activities to compete with the Boy Scouts so they don’t lose membership?

      • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Correct, but girls was their mark of differentiation. Without one, what will they do with this other organization going on their turf? Will they react? Adjust? That’s what I’m saying.

          • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I appreciate the clarification, but I was curious how they avoid redundancy. Luckily, for anyone else who is curious, @MerrySkeptic@sh.itjust.works put a summary of their distinctions in a comment below.

            • Doc Dish@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Thanks. I don’t know a great deal about Girl Guiding’s programme in the UK, but I understand that there’s a similar distinction between it and the Scout Association’s programme as there is in the US.

      • Aqarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes, and the question is how will this separate organisation react to them muscling in on their turf.

        • MerrySkeptic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well they already tried suing them when they began accepting girls and changed their name the first time to Scouts BSA, but that didn’t work. But truthfully the two organizations have different missions and methods.

          Historically, a lot of girls who joined GSUSA thinking it was going to be Boy Scouts for girls were disappointed and would leave. GSUSA is more about empowering girls through community engagement and exploring careers. Yes there can also be camping, hiking, etc but these are more or less optional components, up to each troop to integrate. Rank advancement is based on age and grade level, while awards are based on merit.

          Boy Scouts is much more focused on outdoor skills and citizenship. These are integrated into the program in that advancement in rank is based solely on merit and demonstrating proficiency with these skills. You can spend six years in Boy Scouts and never make it past Tenderfoot.

          So for girls who want more emphasis on the outdoors built into their program, Scouting America would be the better option. For those that want more flexibility and are less outdoorsy, GSUSA is still an option. Both are good programs. I have kids in both. There are some things I like better about GSUSA and some I like more in Boy Scouts. I think Boy Scouts is a more challenging program overall, but GSUSA’s Gold Award is way more challenging to achieve than an Eagle project. I definitely prefer GSUSA not having a religious requirement.

          Both programs will continue to adapt and change. Both have been experiencing declines in membership for decades anyway, so there’s bigger problems that they’re facing.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    TIL they exited bankruptcy last April. I thought they were basically dead.

    I don’t see anything here about preventing future sexual abuse, though, which makes me distrustful.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    Repressive rightists absolutely gonna lose even more of their shit now lol fuck ‘em

  • Delusional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why not just drop boy and have it called “scouts of America” or “youth scouts of America”? Scouting America sounds like a completely different thing altogether.

  • spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    is this a mandela effect or why do i specifically remember hearing that they had already done this like 4-8 years ago

    edit: did my due research

    In 2019, the Boy Scouts of America renamed its flagship program, Boy Scouts, to Scouts BSA to reflect its policy change allowing girls to join separate, gender-specific troops.[3]

    On May 7, 2024, BSA announced that the organization will change its name to Scouting America. The change will go into effect on February 8, 2025.[5]

    • Rayston@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Its odd that apperently the first time they didi it they left BSA, in the name when the B stands for Boy.

      If the whole point was to allow girls, why leave the word boy in the name?

      • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I think two issues have caused them to take baby steps here.
        First, there was a big lawsuit between the Girl Scout of America and the Boy Scouts of America. The Boy Scouts wanted to open up to girls, and the Girl Scouts felt like their turf was being threatened. That took years to resolve.
        Second, scouting has deep personal ties for some folks. People can get irrationally emotional about changes to the program, as if there’s some sacred tradition at stake.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Great, separating kids is soo 1950’s.

    In Europe we’ve had this for decades without any issue.

    And apparently this scouting group does a lot more real scouting stuff, unlike the girl scouts which is basically child labour.

    • duffman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      No issues?

      You guys must be doing it way better over there. Over the course of many years, 12,000 children have been sexually abused in some way while in the boy scouts of America program.

  • Hello_there@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    I feel like this was one of the best experiences of my young life. I get to go away from parents, I can actually decide what we do as a group, and I can go out walking and stuff? Great.