• Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    7 months ago

    I love all the long waiting and useless messages that comes with it, too.

    • Preparing to download.
    • Downloading. useless progress percentage
    • Preparing to install.
    • Installing. more useless progress percentage
    • Please do not turn off your computer.
    • “Hi”.
    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      7 months ago

      Don’t forget when the update stage actually reads 100%, which makes no logical sense because if the stage was at 100%, you wouldn’t still be telling me we are processing it as the current stage.

      • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        7 months ago

        Somehow Windows struggles with file i/o and always has been. When copying stuff to floppy disks in Win 3 or 95 the progress bar steadily grew to 100% and since floppies were loud, you could hear that the actual copying only started then and you had to wait longer staring at 100% than the progress bar before.

        • Zron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          You just gave me a nostalgia bomb of copying files on Win98/XP and watching the little files fly from one folder to the other for 5 minutes after the progress bar filled up.

          I miss little animations like that, makes me wish there were more fun little things in OS UIs these days. Now everything is just a bar and a number.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      meanwhile updates on linux telling me exactly what is happening in real time, working completely in the background, and politely informing me that i may wish to reboot to apply all the updates properly

      • Boozilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Windows: Imma let you finish but first we gotta update my man. Will only take an hour. Maybe three.

        Linux: Save the drama for your mamma.

        • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Linux updates are much superior, but Windows updates have not taken more than 5 minutes for me for a long time.

          I just hate all the reboots. Linux can update everything, even kernels now, and no downtime. Reminds me of crap home internet routers: “oh you changed the date&time? Then I gotta reboot”

          • Boozilla@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The routine Windows updates do go pretty quickly, but the “cumulative updates” can still take a very long time in my experience. I have to patch multiple servers and workstations at my job and it sucks. And if you have a hyper-v guest that lies dormant most of the time, but you need to update it once or twice a month, may the gods help you. Takes forever to even CHECK for updates, because Windows freaks the hell out if your PC remains turned off for a period of time.

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    7 months ago

    I remember Nintendo Wii.

    Nintendo: “Hey, a new system update is here.”

    Me: “So what’s new?”

    Nintendo: (shrug)

    Homebrew people: “This patch changed nothing, except they tried to plug a hole. Damn, took us almost 10 minutes to counteract that this time!”

    (OK, there was one system update where they added the ability to run stuff off of the SD card, but beside that, there were a whole bunch of updates where they tried to stay ahead of homebrew/pirates and failed spectacularly.)

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    7 months ago

    The old paradox of Microsoft security updates. The more frequent they are, the more they look like they’re staying on top of things. While at the same time showing the world there are a lot of frikkin’ security holes in Windows all the time.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      7 months ago

      Update kbmorbillionnumbersandletters:

      Fixes issue in update kbevenmorenumbersandletters

      • cannibalkitteh
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Part of my job used to involve explaining patch supersedence to leadership so that they had a clear idea of why a totally different patch needs to be loaded to address a vulnerability reporting a different patch number in the scanner.

        • yannic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Tenable (or how our security folks have our scans configured) doesn’t seem to get that.

          • cannibalkitteh
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I used to have to explain it to them too, but could usually get them to understand by referencing the CVE and the breakdown from the MS security updates guide.

            • yannic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              My favourite is:

              Them: We want less red in the pie chart. Fix that remote vulnerability.

              Me: We don’t even have that component enabled. It’s reporting on a DLL file version, not the vulnerability itself.

              Them: Just lower our vulnerability score.

              (Me wondering if I deploying dozens of fully-patched systems would have the same proportional effect)

  • kakes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    7 months ago

    If they told people it was just to add more “telemetry” and ads, they wouldn’t install it.

    • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      do they give you the option to not install? i remember windows just updating without ever asking anything

      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        There are songs tools which will disable update altogether, Windows Update Blocker… But you know, use at your own risk or whatever.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    7 months ago

    Ads.

    They just don’t want to tell you about them.

    They want you to find out organically and immediately explode into inconsolable incandescent rage as you tear your system inside out to remove them.

  • voxel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    7 months ago

    there are detailed changelogs for almost every single KB on Microsoft’s website

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      Microsoft: Will somebody please use Edge. Anyone. Please? No, using it to download Firefox doesn’t count!

          • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I am here to complain about how bad winget is. Have not tried the alternatives on windows. I assume they arr much better, mostly because it’s almost impossible to make them worse.

      • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        This comment and subsequent responses are making me wonder now, if you somehow dug out a 15 year old flash drive with like a Firefox 3 installer on it or something, could you get that up and running and eventually updated to the current version?

    • drathvedro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s not like they’re the first ones to do it either. Ubuntu did it before them and it was a massive disaster. Miscrosoft couldn’t not have noticed it. They’ve seen what happened, and they went “Yes, that’s exactly what we want” anyway.

    • TAYRN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Which VPN were you using that stopped working after a windows update?

      Or did you just read a headline and not bother to look into it any further?

        • TAYRN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Can you provide a source that it affected “many people and corporations”? If there are so many, it should be easy to name one.

        • TAYRN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You didn’t answer me, so I’ll give you another chance. You must’ve missed my question last time. Which VPN were you using which stopped working after a windows update?

          I hope you weren’t just lying to my face.

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Tinc gets broken by Windows updates every once in a while. The problem is that the update sometimes renames the network connections and Tinc needs the connection to have a specific name to work.

        That’s the one I personally ran into several times now.

        • TAYRN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah, none of those are affecting me right now. I don’t think they’re affecting you, either.

          • Promethiel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Holy fuck ignore my other comment. “Yeah your reality sounds different from mine, you’re wrong.” You’re just a stunted mind, no longer interesting.

          • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Given that I literally said I personally encountered this problem: Yes, it does. It’s mostly just an annoyance that goes straight onto the “Windows Update jank” pile but I have wasted quite a bit of time helping people deal with connectivity issues that could down to “tinc_vpn” getting automatically renamed to “Network Connection 7”.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Microsoft also really likes to install the update on your machine, wait a while, then finally activate whatever feature it is they changed.

      Like I think I read somewhere that every machine running 22H2 around the time 23H2 came out was actually running 23, but with most of the new features turned off. Also even before 23H3 came out they were sprinkling those features into 22 so by the time I updated nothing changed.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, for that reason, the feature upgrades only take a normal restart compared to the 30+ minute upgrade of the past.

  • Varyag@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Dunno, but graphics drivers stopped working again! Go reinstall them!

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    With the millions of updates they keep pushing, you’d think by now, they would have fixed their drivers going stale out of nowhere and shit just stops working until you remove and reinstall them and reboot, for some weird reason.