The former president made multiple chilling warnings during an interview with Time magazine.

Donald Trump hasn’t quite let go of the possibility of utilizing mob violence if he loses the next election.

In a sprawling interview for Time magazine, Trump hinted that leveraging political violence to achieve his end goals was still on the table.

“If we don’t win, you know, it depends,” he told Time. “It always depends on the fairness of the election.”

And from Trump’s perspective, that’s winning rhetoric. According to him, his incendiary comments supporting a mob mentality, his early warnings of forthcoming abuses of power, and his threats to be a dictator on “day one” are only inching him closer to the White House. “I think a lot of people like it,” Trump told Time.

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      7 months ago

      They have teeth. But half of the people who decide whether or not they pursue charges against someone are republican appointees.

      So, you know… teeth, but corrupted leadership.

        • MediumGray@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes and no. I can’t speak to the particulars of this situation but differences in means matter even if they currently produce the same outcome. A toothless dog and a dog in a muzzle are different in important ways.

        • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          I don’t really disagree in present circumstances.
          But I feel it’s necessary to characterize it correctly. Characterizing the FEC as a whole to be deficient when it’s a few bad actors temporarily at the head of the FEC could be used as justification by other bad actors or well-intentioned but misled people to undermine the FEC - which would make it deficient should the leadership issues be corrected.

          Sort of the game that conservatives play with government services. Cut the funding until the service is flagging, then use that as justification to either further cut the budget or reduce the scope of the service until the service is no longer a real government service.
          Can’t let ourselves buy into that.

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have strong doubts. The people most likely to “Jan 6” did. A number of them, particularly the mid-level leaders, that actually organized things, are in prison. They have not turned out in numbers since they started getting arrested.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      7 months ago

      They got light sentences. And let’s face it, the people that are going to organize yet another insurrection are going to be duped by the same logic that Trump will pardon them or that their acts are justified.

      Trump is threatening our democracy. Again.

      He’s saying that if he doesn’t win, there’s going to be another insurrection.

      The sad reality is that over the last four years, fascist states have put laws into place that make it legal to overturn elections for little to no reason. No oversight.

      He won’t need an insurrection because he has willing accomplices.

      • Jaysyn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        They got light sentences.

        False. Some of the ones that took a plea deal got light sentences. They also can no longer vote.

        The ones that didn’t take plea deals got sentences completely in line with the Federal Sentencing guidelines, because that is how our modern Federal courts work.

          • stringere@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah but for the majority of federal crimes you’re probably comparing these sentences to drug offender sentences which are much harsher because of the seriousness of the offense.

            /s before crucifixion; drug sentences are ridiculous and these traitors getting anything less than a felony disqualifying them from participating in the system they tried to break is madness.

            Believing someone when they say the money in the cash register is rightly yours and should be taken by force does not mean you get a pass when you rob a gas station.

        • WraithGear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          7 months ago

          I don’t think voting was a concern when they committed to the coop. Hopefully they are not merely on house arrest after the next election

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        7 months ago

        But that won’t take them any closer to toppling the government. Jan. 6 could only happen because Trump actively prevented the police from doing their jobs. That won’t happen under Biden.

  • yuri@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    7 months ago

    Fucken Bolsonaro did the same shit and it’s looking like he’s actually gonna get prosecuted. Real shame the US government isn’t up to the high standards set by Brazil, but maybe we’ll get there someday!

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 months ago

    How many more Babbits will trump create when he can’t tell the capital police to stand down? Or even, how many of his idiot followers are even going to show up when they got fucked and abandoned last time?

    You’re a pathetic weakling Donnie, go sit the fuck down and pout to a judge.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      How many more Babbits will trump create when he can’t tell the capital police to stand down?

      Enough Ashley Babbits and its less of a problem for conservatives than for the police.

  • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh, fuck off, the only reason it got that far on Jan 6 is that he was already in charge and refused to call in troops to immediately shut it down. I doubt Biden sits on his hands for several hours while rioters attack the Capitol.

  • nycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 months ago

    I know what the headline actually means but i’m choosing to believe that donny just found out about calendars.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The only reason it happened the first time is because he was able to allow it to happen… but he ain’t the one in the oval office now.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      Right. Biden would have immediately deployed the national guard in response to a march on the Capitol. Trump intentionally did not, he encouraged the mob and then watched the whole thing unfold on television and didn’t lift a finger.

      The next group of MAGA idiots who show up to pull a Jan 6 2.0 will get turned away by authorities actually equipped to handle them.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          If they get smarter they’ll see that everyone in 1.0 got thrown under the bus and they won’t show up for 2.0

        • Furbag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ultimately I don’t think that will matter much. Acts of domestic terrorism or sabotage won’t affect the outcome of the executive maintaining power and are unlikely to garner much sympathy. Trump wanted to make sure he won by attacking the weakest points of the electoral system - slates of false electors to sow doubt and discord, and when that failed, inciting a mob to interrupt the certification. I think both of those points are still vulnerable to attack, but there are a lot more eyes on it now after 2020. Trump is already on trial for trying to overturn the election, and Biden has no reason to allow an armed mob of crazies storm the Capitol, win or lose.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh? I thought Jan 6th was AntiFA?

    By all means fuck around & find out. The Capitol police will have their submachine guns this time.

    Not to mention the fact your supporters won’t even show up to your trials after you abandoned them & stabbed them in the back last time, you wretched piece of shit.