It seems possible that Brave are building Brave Pro, which looks like its a subscription based service of some kind. A note on the Android implementation of the project reads (GitHub link):

"Implement the required runtime changes (profile settings, chrome flags, group policies, etc.) with the appropriate values that enable the Brave Pro experience. Using Brave in this mode with its default settings and making changes to the Brave Pro defaults require an active paid subscription.

When the browser has no active credentials for Brave Pro, the panel UI will promote the service and include the initial payment CTA. When credentials are present the panel UI will include the appropriate toggles for making changes to the default settings."

It also links to a private Google Doc.

  • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    Unsurprisingly, Brave will try to profit from privacy seeking users…I hope their company dies a horrible financial death.

    I’ve always disliked Brave for their carelessness in pursuing their business needs, adding stupid things like worthless crypto to try to buy out the advertisers and selling out their search indexing to the highest bidder.

    Instead of just going the meta-search route by indexing by themselves; spreading out queries to multiple services; caching results; and just providing the results to users privately like a real company offering privacy would; they just gave up and let Bing do all of it.

    They could’ve even negotiated their API usage and allowed for relevant ‘in-result list ads’ that were clearly marked as Ads without compromising the privacy of their search services to help defray costs of hitting the APIs of bigger players like Google, Yahoo or Bing and allowing advertisements relevant to queries to flow without compromising on user’s privacy or letting big advertisers know who’s searching what.

    Additionally Brave has done a number of other shady things that on the surface might be advertised as helping your privacy; but really isn’t. In my opinion they should have hard-abandoned Chromium over Manifest v3 and rebased onto Firefox to keep their browser from becoming less privacy respecting overall.

      • Onihikage@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean, yes, I daily drive Firefox myself. If one must have a Chromium-based browser, however, Vivaldi is very much not-Google, very much not crypto, and is all around pretty based. It’s a solid choice for a secondary “I’m going to need something chromium on rare occasions” browser.

          • Onihikage@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I don’t know if this has changed, but last time I used Ungoogled Chromium, I recall the UI still referred to Google and/or its services in many areas, even if the underlying code’s removal made those areas nonfunctional. Google’s name is also still right in the browser title, like free advertising every time I look at it, and that bothers me as well.

            • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I mean, why should the team bother so much with removing the UI elements? As a former developer I can tell that it’s not that easy. And where did you see Google in the title? I don’t remember seeing it in the last 2 years

    • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Not in actual privacy tests. And Brave is at least mostly open source. Not great either when compared to a good FF config, Firefox+arkenfox and ublock medium

        • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not a brave employee and barely affiliated with them. Also Firefox browsers come out on top still. Vivaldi is missing much of the fingerprint disception features of Brave or Firefox. It is also closed source meaning it isn’t a good choice for privacy anyways. All around a shit take when it is obvious Vivaldi isn’t built for anti-fingerprinting. I am by no means a supporter of Brave, I stay far away from it and its shit.

            • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Does that change the fact that Vivaldi is not a good privacy browser? Its content blocker is weak, its based on chromium which is affected by MV3, it can’t protect screen dimension fingerprinting, or canvas fingerprinting, or containerize cookies, or block 3rd party scrips and frames, or standardize specific settings like Firefoxes RFP, etc. Not a good privacy browser. Use a fully open source browser.

  • Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    i still use brave search because they are the only privacy-oriented search to have their own index. Unless someone can correct me. but then they screwed up a beautiful thing with the LLM garbage, so idk if i can stand to use it anymore honestly.

    The browser sucks and is bloated. they have some really good ideas in it, but it’s mixed in with so much crap.

    Also the Google Doc is hilarious.