It started with notebooks, but that wasn’t the master plan.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The next product should be a sustainable, not publicly traded company. If investors take majority ownership and IPO, Framework’s perceived mission will evaporate quickly in the inevitable search for ever growing profits. I sincerely hope Nirav and Co actually give a shit about the repairable product and retain majority shares. If not 👉👌…

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      7 months ago

      How about a repairable phone with a headphone jack?

      The Framework 16 notebook doesn’t even have a headphone jack, only a USB-C to jack adapter.

      • Nighed@sffa.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s one of the slot in ones though right? so it doesn’t really count - it effectively integrated.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          It counts because the adapter slot cannot be used for something else. It is different with the smaller 13 inch model.

      • HEXN3T
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t even use built-in headphone jacks anymore. I use external DACs with 2.5, 4.4 and quarter inch. Good thing for me that I can get an extra port while others can use a headphone jack still.

    • nezbyte@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      Modular ports would be great. I’d love to have two USB ports on a phone rather than a USB and headphone jack.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m pretty sure that a USB hub would work at least on Android, giving you as many ports as you want.

    • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      Repairable, open phone, you can load whatever OS you want. A phone that is more akin to a computer than a smartphone. A pinephone, but better.

    • xor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why not just use type c headphones?

      The 3.5mm thing has always baffled me, it feels like complaining your pc doesn’t have a VGA port, except the thing you connect costs like a fiver

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Just replace my perfectly good $200 headphones that work in my (old) phone, my Switch, my 3DS, my laptop, my iPod, and my work phone.

        It’s so simple!

        Seriously, even if you don’t use it, why are you so against others having the choice? The headphone *jack was the standard for decades for a reason. If my phone is low on power, I’d like to be able to charge it without disconnecting my music/podcasts…

        • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          But like, 3.5 to usbc is a 10 buck conversion. Tbh i see merit in double usb c over usbc and headphone jack, might be more doable too, the DAC prolly takes more space than an additional usbc

            • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              I hear you, but a usb-c has more uses than one, the only real problem with a dongle is now is that occasionally you need to charge.

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s not a work-around, a headphone requires a DAC and an amp. In fact, my phone has a crap DAC causing artifacts in the sound. It’s actually not to my benefit to have the jack because I’d get better sound with the external DAC which is transparent.

              So the jack works, but the DAC you get can be whatever the manufacturer considers good enough.

              DACs I can hear issues in:

              My phone, my tablet, my desktop PC

              DACs that are transparent to me:

              My laptop, my $12 external DAC

              • Empricorn@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                That’s great! But Framework also includes an audio jack built-in. As should everyone.

                • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  But Framework also includes an audio jack built-in.

                  Nope, the new 16 inch does not. The older 13 does.

            • Bilb!@lem.monster
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              A dongle is a solution to the problem “I want to use my headphones with a device with only a USB-C port.”

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        At the time, there weren’t really many good options for replacement devices.

        Using the charging port means listening to music and charging at the same time wasn’t possible.

        Now we have split-cable dongles for power banks, and we have wireless charging when possible. It’s better but it’s not great; both have downsides, and accessories are more $.

        Do they make type C headphones with a powerbank in them? Do I want a lithium battery that large on my head?

        There aren’t many upsides for the consumer or the environment. Still seems to me like this isn’t even a lateral move. Internal components have gotten smaller and more efficient since, so that space could be reclaimed. I really don’t need my phone to be that thin, a phono jack next to the charging port would be just fine. The only real downside might be waterproofing but if you can make it work for the type C port…

    • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      A Framework phone with 2 modular Framework sockets would be amazing. I don’t care if it’s thick. Make it repairable and support Linux Phone OSes like postmarketOS and I would absolutely buy it.

  • pastabatman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    7 months ago

    Surely they are aiming for a repairable and modular smartphone eventually. That’s going to be super hard to do. My guess is their next form factor will be a tablet.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Tablet is almost free, just don’t have a hinge and have a touchscreen. Release as Chromebook, it will run Android applications

          • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Linux can run Android apps since we have Waydroid too and it’s universal, no need for single device - single OS nonsense.

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              You can install Linux on their Chromebooks, so it would be good to have the choice. Some people will prefer a slightly more seamless Android experience and some people will prefer Waydroid

        • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          A reminder that if something can run Android or ChromeOS doesn’t mean drivers would be available for Linux. And usually they aren’t.

          • pastabatman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            You can order that tablet with Ubuntu, mint, Manjaro, zorin, elementary, etc. There’s gotta be some kind of driver support to build on, no?

  • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 months ago

    Arm machines that are repairable to compete with Apple would be very cool in my opinion. Maybe team up with an integrator like sys76. Could be very cool. I’d personally line up to buy.

  • devilish666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 months ago

    As long as the company itself doesn’t become greedy and doesn’t change it’s mission & vision i always support it

  • seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’m waiting for them to offer a chassis to convert their laptop parts into USFF PCs. Reusing old parts after an upgrade is pretty attractive. I think they mentioned this a while back, I’ve been waiting for it to happen.

    I’d also like to see a thunderbolt or oculink GPU bay part that would enable eGPU use with their machines.

    And if we’re wishlisting top facing speakers would be 🤌

  • IllNess@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    Tomorrow, it wants to be a consumer electronics company, period.

    Patel won’t say — I only get the barest hints, no matter how many different ways I ask.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    I want one with an e-ink display. That way I can swap out the e-ink display when I need to for a proper display. That wouldn’t work on a normal laptop but should work for their uniquely modular design.

  • brenticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m curious to see where they go next. A lot of modern consumer electronics have repairability and upgradeability problems, but I also wouldn’t expect they’d be able to crack into the phone market as easily as the laptop market, so presumably there’s some more niche target they have.

  • xlash123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m sure a Framework phone is at least an idea for them to produce. Definitely an extremely difficult challenge. It would be nice if it allowed for removable RAM, but it could be hard due to SODIMM being relatively large or due to RAM being put on SOCs. I imagine it shouldn’t be too much to ask for removable storage at least, given how small NVME drives can get. Upgradable SOC/motherboard is a must.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    That’s one of the biggest reasons it just raised another $18 million in funding — it wants to expand beyond the laptop into “additional product categories.”

    Framework CEO Nirav Patel tells me that has always been the plan and that the company originally had other viable ideas beyond laptops, too.

    Framework might choose an “equally difficult” category or might instead try something “a bit smaller and simpler to execute, streamlined now that we have all this infrastructure.”

    (Patel recently suggested to Jason Carman that Framework might adapt its marketing to reach more everyday audiences.)

    The company’s $9 million seed round paid for the original 13-inch laptop design, which has carried on for three generations of components.

    Today, Framework has about 50 employees, and it plans to expand to 60 before the end of the year, with “a bit of additional team growth” in 2025.


    The original article contains 653 words, the summary contains 144 words. Saved 78%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!