The governor of Kansas vetoed an anti-LGBTQ+ bill while simultaneously letting a law pass requiring ID to view “acts of homosexuality.”

Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly issued vetoes Friday against a ban on gender-affirming care for minors as well as two anti-abortion measures. She also let pass without her signature a law requiring age-verification to view content “harmful to minors.”

Under Kansas criminal law, material “harmful to minors” includes nudity and “sexual content,” which is defined in part as “acts of masturbation, homosexuality, or sexual intercourse.”

The law, which will go into effect on July 1, requires users to share their government-issued identification in order to view adult content. Websites can be fined up to $10,000 for each instance a minor accesses their content, and parents are allowed to sue for damages of at least $50,000.

This could theoretically apply to family-friendly media with queer characters, LGBTQ+ charities and community resources, or even medical websites that include information on gender and sexuality. Such websites could soon be forced to block access to young users — cutting off their access to vital resources and information — or face hefty fines.

Kelly did not comment on the age-verification bill, but gave justification for each of her vetoes. She said that a ban on gender-affirming care for minors “tramples parental rights” and targets “a small group.” She vetoed a similar bill last year, and the legislature did not have the votes to override it.

“If the Legislature paid this much attention to the other 99.8% of students, we’d have the best schools on earth,” she wrote.

Lawmakers were able to override Kelly’s veto on an anti-transgender school sports bill last year. Her veto of a bill ending the state’s legal recognition of changes in gender identity was also overridden, meaning that transgender people can no longer change their sex on their driver’s licenses or birth certificates in the state.

The minority leader of the Kansas Senate, Democrat Dinah Sykes of Topeka, told The Advocate earlier this month that she’s concerned Republicans will have the votes to override Kelly’s vetoes this time around. She said that the laws are “just filled with hate and really just an ignorance toward what this community goes through.”

“It makes these children feel so different and feel like outcasts, and that’s just so cruel," Sykes said. “I worry that these kids and their parents won’t feel safe in Kansas and that they will move to other states, and it’s a loss for our state. Unfortunately, we’re going to lose some wonderful Kansans because of this bill.”

    • Gormadt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      8 months ago

      Authoritarians going to do what authoritarians do

    • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s both Republicans and Democrats, the “tik tok” bill will make it illegal to use a VPN and that’s supported by both parties.

      • GarfGirl [she/her]OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, it sucks fr. the governor who let this go through without vetoing it was literally a dem herself.

      • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I looked it up and it seems that the bill that would restrict VPNs was an old one that was shot down a while ago

        The current tiktok one should not impact VPNs

  • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 months ago

    “I worry that these kids and their parents won’t feel safe in Kansas and that they will move to other states, and it’s a loss for our state. Unfortunately, we’re going to lose some wonderful Kansans because of this bill.”

    This is exactly what they want to happen

    • GarfGirl [she/her]
      shield
      OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      OP has “big proponent of killing all cis men” in their bio

      its a very obvious joke

      also you werent banned for participating in 196, you were banned for saying a slur and then repeatedly doubling down on it, spamming reports on various users in the comm with the reason just being “stupid c*nt” each time and commenting under every post i made with your half a dozen alt accounts over the course of a week

      modlog screenshots:

        • GarfGirl [she/her]OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          i’ve told you this like three months ago when you last did it but i’ll explain it again, i got a report on one of your comments, and i dismissed the comment without removing it. Ada, the instance admin, then undismissed the report because she felt i should do something about it so iirc i removed the comment and put in a temp ban, then you immediately spent the next week accusing random people of being sockpuppets of me, report spamming the comm, and replying to every single post i made, that’s when you earned a permanent ban on all of your accounts - the ban reason wasnt for transphobia, it was for being a weird internet freak over being banned from a comm you had literally never posted in before.