• NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    148
    ·
    7 months ago

    Well, it’s Mental Outlaw. He’s a contender for one of the most paranoid tech YouTubers out there.

  • brokenlcd@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    7 months ago

    This reminds me of that copy pasta about having an old printer and a gun in case it does something unexpected; can’t remember the exact words though.

  • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    7 months ago

    I wish he didn’t ramble as much as he does. Most of his videos could be a quarter of the length.

    • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      He’s kind of like that crazy prepper/survivalist uncle who lives in the ass end of nowhere, has a homemade fallout shelter stocked to the ceiling with canned chicken and peach, sleeps with a combat knife under his pillow, and rants about the government and agencies whenever he gets the chance. The family still keeps him around because he sometimes does something useful.

      Luke Smith, on the other hand, is already out in the desert building a shrine to Old Man Atom.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    7 months ago

    There is no software solution that protects from a crowbar, you have to go to the hardware side.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      this is why I always laugh when people use biometrics. best case scenario, they use whatever it’s locked behind with you under duress. Worst case? they take whatever.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        “I laugh at people who use security that is possible – unlikely – but possible, to defeat”

        -Internet Chode #577645086

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        The random person the receptionist let into the main office is not likely to chop my finger off to access my phone or computer. I don’t use biometrics because I don’t want Samsung and Microsoft having my fingerprints for their eventual reconstruction of humanity into Tleilaxu gholas in service to the shareholders.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          the random person that wandered in is also unlikely to ask you for your keys or your password

      • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I dont get it. In that cenario, using Biometrics is not less secure as that wrench would convince you of telling the password.

        Btw biometrics dont work on first boot on android, or after you used the wrong finger a few times on GrapheneOS. They will also implement a duress long-powerbutton-press feature in some future, to reboot the phone.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          I dont get it. In that cenario, using Biometrics is not less secure as that wrench would convince you of telling the password.

          A password is safer because they will need you alive and conscious. To bypass the biometrics, you just need the body part.

        • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          At least they need to keep you conscious and able to speak if its a password tho. Small mercies.

    • Quack Doc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      7 months ago

      we already have them. It’s not hard to make a firearm, and the 3d printed weapons scene has taken off quite well. all of the good ones still need metal parts ofc, but they are pretty easy to get your hands on in many cases.

          • SSTF@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            It really depends on the design and how much of it somebody is committed to 3D printing. If somebody wants to 3D print the bare minimum for legal purposes and use a parts kit for the rest, there’s a number of designs that seem identical in function to something factory made.

      • HEXN3T
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s not hard to make a firearm, but it’s pretty hard to make a good one. I could maybe make something about ten times worse than that thing that one Aussie kid made during WWI in his garage.

        • Quack Doc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          specific parts. you need metal to withstand the pressures of the actual bullet to get a somewhat degree of reliability, so any pressure bearing part needs to be metal, everything else can be plastic, but the more metal the better. Now you can get some more basic designs with parts that you could fabricate at home, but a lot of the higher end designs require off the shelf gun parts.

          The “leading design” right now is the FGC-9 which is actually seeing a degree of use in myanmar(??). The design requires metal parts that could be feasible to fabricate at home. However it is shockingly easy, even in heavily restricted countries, to be able to order the metal parts.

        • SSTF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          You can get parts or parts kits (random example) and make the receiver/frame (whatever the legal “gun” part happens to be on a design) yourself.

    • SuperSynthia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 months ago

      “Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary” —-Karl Marx

      • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ha ha I see how your worker’s rights ended up even with guns, you fucking coward 😂

        • SuperSynthia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          7 months ago

          Normally I would just let it slide, but I’m bored so why not have some discourse :)

          1. I do not own fire arms personally due to mental health issues. I do carry pepper spray and have a taser readily available. Worst case scenario a bow I use for hunting.

          2. There are legitimate uses for fire arms full stop. Protection against bodily threats, hunting, tyrannical government, etc.

          3. I support universal background checks and “common sense gun regulation”. It is a dangerous tool, but it is still just a tool. I’d love to see mandatory fire arm safety training before attempting to buy a gun.

          4. Workers rights are bogged down because of hierarchical systems designed towards uplifting the few and the expense of the many.

          Why should the government have exclusive use of violence? In any case, the eventual goal (for me personally and people like me) is peace and liberty. Until that happens the working class must have access to fire arms. The people who should not own guns are those with mental health issues, and access should be limited to trained/responsible individuals.

          • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            A gun is not a tool you need. It is just needed because you expect others to also have it.

            Against random robberies, pepperspray, tasers or sirens are better.

            If “the woman at night on the walk home” has a gun, “the robber” has one too. Nothing won.

            If it is circulating, you cannot prevent the wrong people from getting them.

            I see how not only the police having guns is nice. But this means they shoot way quicker. See the rate of deaths by police in germany, its always below 30.

            • SuperSynthia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              I get what your saying completely. I don’t disagree per se actually (my brain tells me we just have lived in a crazy time for the past couple hundred years, guns are super prolific.). I would love if the police disarmed as well.

        • SuperSynthia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Karl Marx isn’t really random, he is the godfather of communism. Now I am not a full blown communist by any means but Karl Marx was a really smart dude who correctly saw and anticipated the negative effects of capitalism. It’s ok to disagree, I respect that completely but I’d ask we keep it civil.

        • itslilith
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          7 months ago

          There’s a very large overlap, but I can’t blame any minorities wanting to arm themselves in the current political climate. Arm queer people!

    • devnull406@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I know you’re just trolling or whatever, but I’d love to have some reasonable answer to what a non-cowardly response is supposed to be if there is some armed person trying to hurt me or my family. The police response time where I live is 30-45 minutes. I don’t want to shoot someone, I hope I never have to, but if it’s either me or them? Well that’s what makes having guns practical.

      • Juice88@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You guys are seeing something I’m not. Both that barrel length and the mag look way smaller to be what you guys are claiming. I’ve got a FN 509 that’s close what you guys are describing and it’s much bigger than that (although the angle of the pic could just be messing with my eyes)

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Looks like the [320-M18] model, which comes default with a [15] round flush magazine. Then again we can’t see the bottom in the picture and nothing is stopping him from putting an extended magazine in.