• seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    The US acting fast to curtail corporate overreach just isn’t going to happen. We stopped doing that in the 70s.

      • seaQueue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s the GOP MO. Grind literally everything to a halt until they control both houses and the executive branch, then cut taxes on the rich, cram in as many judicial appointments as possible and weaken regulatory bodies as much as they can. They’ve been running that playbook since the mid 00’s.

  • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Authorities should also “urgently” consider outlawing the publication of the “weights,” or inner workings, of powerful AI models, for example under open-source licenses, with violations possibly punishable by jail time, the report says

    Fuck that, so only huge corporations can have access to it. You won’t even be able to have start ups to challenge the behemoths because this would shut down any open scientific papers explaining how AI works to get started.

    If you want to make a case this technology is an existential threat equivalent to nukes and any proliferation is dangerous then treat it like nukes and nationalize it and make it so only government can produce it. At least the government is nominally subject to the people instead of a bunch of companies who will happily destroy the world if it makes them an extra buck.

    We’re probably nowhere near that threat though so something like this would only serve to widen the gap between the current batch of huge AI companies and smaller scale developers and enthusiasts.

  • Daxtron2@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is exactly what the big AI companies want. This will kill open source and freely available AI and anything made with it, forcing the only available options to be proprietary and lucrative.