This toggle is annoying because what was once 1 press to turn on BT is now 2. It gets me every day.

  • Keith@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have the opposite. I have never a reason to turn off Bluetooth, but always want to connect of disconnect devices. this is so much better than long pressing.

    • Album@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah they built this UI on the assumption that people didn’t turn off their BT generally. This is an improvement for me but I really don’t see why they can’t make it an option for people.

      • evo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s not an assumption. They obviously have telemetry that shows the vast majority of people never turn Bluetooth or WiFi off.

        • N4CHEM@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          8 months ago

          …or maybe the people who turn off Bluetooth also tend to disable/block telemetry.

        • Album@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah I don’t turn that off generally either but you’re right the wifi panel has been like this for a bit and now it’s consistent.

    • cobysev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      8 months ago

      My wife’s car is extremely aggressive. The second she turns it on, it steals my Bluetooth connection. I could be mowing my lawn, listening to music on my phone, then suddenly hear nothing, and it’s because my wife got in her car and was suddenly blasted with my tunes.

      I tell my phone to forget her car’s Bluetooth connection, but then I’m constantly harassed by pop-ups on my phone every minute saying her car wants to pair with my phone. I can’t get it to stop pinging me. It sees a Bluetooth device in range and then spams it, trying to connect.

      So yes, I like to keep my Bluetooth off until I want to use it.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        8 months ago

        Have a dig through the cars Bluetooth settings and see if you can delete the pairing from that end.

        • cobysev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’ve done that, but it still pings every Bluetooth connection it sees, whether it recognizes it or not.

          Her car had some class-action lawsuit recently because its integrated satellite radio service was constantly pinging for a connection, whether you had the service or not. If the car wasn’t driven in a few days, the battery would be completely drained. And you couldn’t jump it yourself; it had to be towed to a shop so they could use some special machine to jump and charge it.

          That issue has been settled, but now its Bluetooth is basically doing the same thing. Fortunately only while the car is on, but still.

          • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            Hmm. Well that sucks.

            Personally; I refuse to connect a phone to a car via Bluetooth. Too many reports of cars harvesting every available bit of info it can access from the connection and storing/uploading it inaccessible/immovable to the owner.

            Aux cable, fm transmitter, or deal with the radio.

          • bus_factor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            Sounds like you need to give it something to connect to. Buy a cheap analog-to Bluetooth transmitter, charge it from the car and just never turn it off. You’d need to do some research to find one which doesn’t go to sleep. If you need to use your phone in the car, just turn the transmitter off.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s a pain if you share a car. Whoever starts the car gets to interrupt the other one’s phone call.

      • illi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Our car does this as well, but then when I get in it sometimes just refuses to connect automatically, so this actually helps me immensly.

    • woodenskewer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      I turn it off daily. I have 2 phones and I don’t want to connect my personal phone to my BT speaker at work. I can see where you’re coming from though.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t want to connect my personal phone to my BT speaker at work

        I’m confused, do you shuttle the same speaker between work and home or is work a separate speaker? If it’s a separate speaker why don’t you just delete it’s pairing from your personal phone?

    • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Supermarkets and malls etc, use Bluetooth beacons to track, and profile you. I’m always turning mine off, when in those kind of places.

      • macattack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think this is the reason why Google implemented it. They already track you over Wi-Fi when you do not explicitly turn off the option, so Bluetooth is going the same route

    • Norgur@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah. That’s my use case as well. I rather liked this. Even if I want to turn off BT, this is just one small button more that’s almost underneath the fingertip on my phone when you press the bt.

    • exanime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I was like you once until I got a speaker for the bathroom and now the wife and I fight over it…

      If we both have BT on, the speaker will connect to the last phone which is almost always the wrong one… And then the yelling fest starts so the other turns it off

  • macattack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t want to go conspiracy theory, but in my opinion it feels like a dark pattern to increase the time people have Bluetooth on. I believe they did the same thing with success for Wi-Fi. If I recall correctly, even when you are not connected to a device, Google can estimate your location based on what Wi-Fi networks you are in proximity to and something to varying degrees might work for Bluetooth as well which is why they also roll the feature over to the Bluetooth toggle

      • clgoh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not at all. That’s what people want. Nobody turns off Bluetooth.

        • N4CHEM@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s not what people want, that’s why this post exists and it has 69 comments so far.

        • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          If you wanted that, you’d simply just leave Bluetooth toggled on and take it off your top quick toggles.

        • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Then why do I have non-tech people in my life complaining about these toggles within toggles?

          For those that want it always on, they could do so just as easily before the update that adds a layer of obfuscation. This is not about what people want.

    • evo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Wut. Why would they bother when your cellular connection is constantly pinging all towers to literally triangulate your location? Why do something much more complicated to get data they already have?

      The real answer is they are a multi billion dollar company with telemetry. Obviously, the vast majority of people never turn off WiFi or Bluetooth. Most people want quick access to connect to a WiFi network or Bluetooth device, not to toggle either off.

      • macattack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        I believe that Wi-Fi points are more accurate than towers especially when they’re sharing the information with indoor retailers

      • Vega@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Bluetooth give a lot more information about your surrounding (what device your phone detect or connect, for how much time, distance from objects, etc.), not only from your phone alone, but from other people phones who have bluetooth on and e.g. never disable any tracking from google services too. And the Mac address for bluetooth never change, so any device (and tracking company) will know you is forever you. Bluetooth is a privacy nightmare, and this is totally a dark pattern. People not knowing what they’re doing is of course a thing, but it seems just a usual bad practice by google, who like to manipulate especially not tech-savvy people

    • JWBananas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      They already do that regardless of the state of those toggles. You have to turn that off in a different spot.

      The main Bluetooth and Wi-Fi toggles otherwise just stop your device from actively associating/pairing with other devices. They do not control the radios.

  • asciimage@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    8 months ago

    I like the way Nothing OS does it. Tapping the icon toggles Bluetooth on/off, and tapping the text/rest of the button opens the popup.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    8 months ago

    I was just grumbling about this today. It’s one of those little changes that might help someone, but interrupts a flow that worked well for me.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 months ago

    Can we talk about how space inefficient the UI is? It takes up the entire screen to essentially show 6 buttons. And I bet like the Internet toggle that it moves the buttons around when it detects new networks

    • Michal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s actually 9 buttons + DONE button. Each device has the option to connect to it by clicking its name, or enter Settings by tapping on its gear icon.

          • Cort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            I think Android 12 is where this was introduced, and 13 where they made the buttons even bigger

  • WereCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    I prefer this. I’ve been annoyed by having to go to the settings every time I wanted to swap device I want to connect to. I rarely turn off BT anyways.

    • Tier 1 Build-A-Bear 🧸@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 months ago

      Before it was a single tap to turn Bluetooth on/off, and a tap+hold to open the Bluetooth settings (or any quick setting tile in your notification tray). Maybe you just didn’t know about that feature but the old way was 100% better.

  • lorkano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Going through the comments, I think it’s clear to conclude this should be a choice to configure this tile. Some people prefer single tap to turn off, some don’t

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    ?

    Does it not turn on Bluetooth before opening that menu?

    It does for me.

    Bluetooth on: single tap turns it off.

    Bluetooth off: single tap turns it on and opens that menu so you can select a device to connect to. (it still connects to the last connected device automatically) From there tapping back or tapping beside it closes it.

    Been that way for several years now. (Samsung A54, and A52 prior to this one)

    • Bonehead@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not on my Pixel 8. Single tap on the Bluetooth button only opens the Bluetooth connection screen with a separate toggle to actually turn on Bluetooth once you’re in there. Google likes to do things the hard way.

        • Bonehead@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I just drag down from the top of the screen, and tap the Bluetooth button. That’s it. The Bluetooth connection screen pops up, but that doesn’t turn on Bluetooth. I have tap the toggle to actually turn on Bluetooth, just like OP describes. I have a Pixel 8 with stock Android 14.

  • Sunny' 🌻@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    I honestly thought this was my own doing and was about to go insane when I couldn’t find the setting to revert this. Why on earth would they do this…

    • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve felt this a lot over the years. Regressions in interface designs happen here and there, and I feel it’s just people justifying their jobs. We have to change this, and that, and EVERYTHING, to keep it fresh. Where in reality, sometimes only some things need changing.

    • woodenskewer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I put buttons on screens for people at work and I’m imagining the fury that would rain down on me if I put 2 buttons in place do a normal thing that was once one button. I would never hear the end of it.

  • jbk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    Fuck Google’s recent changes to the quick settings panel, really. Especially now that One UI 6 didn’t revert those changes like it was done with One UI 5.

  • nxdefiant@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I don’t like it, but I like it more than the old way of holding the button down to get to the menu. I do hate that the “see all” menu doesn’t just expand the current menu, it takes you to the old menu. There’s definitely hints of windows95 creeping into Android.

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    this entire quick actions shade was redesigned either for children or for elders

    the space now used for 4 quick actions could fit 12 quick actions before