• Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    Nah. It’s degrading the internet, for sure; but not killing it. We got a similar event in September 1993 and the internet survived fine.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      At least this time around there is intelligence involved, even if it is artificial.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        A lot of the newbies were simply clueless, not necessarily lacking intelligence. Still, they were generating a sudden and huge influx of low quality “content” aka noise, lowering the ability of the [previous] userbase to find what it wanted, and that userbase got understandably pissed.

        And eventually this was solved - some platforms died, some got moribund, but the ones that were able to ride on the new times thrived. And more importantly, the internet as a whole found ways to contain and sort that noise.

        That’s a lot like what’s happening now, except that the agents are not a huge crowd of noobs - they’re a handful of shitty people using LLMs and Stable Diffusion to do so.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      “similar”

      lol. a massive growth in real, human, users is not “similar” to a massive growth in fake undependable data with zero to negative value.