What… are we just a penguin and Apple Trees…

For real, though, I wish Microsoft (mojang does…) cared enough to support Linux for BE.

  • maynarkh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    8 months ago

    I just want to mention that I hate that Microsoft seems to think that they own the term “Personal Computer”.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Was it Microsoft that “took it” though? I always thought it was Apple that started calling their machines Mac as opposed to PCs (the others) and the term just stuck to Microsoft because, of course, there are only two options /s

      If anything, I hate that Apple doesn’t call their machines PCs, which they absolutely are.

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        They also don’t call their phones… phones, or smartphones even, it’s always iPhone.

      • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        historically a “PC” is a machine compatible with the “IBM PC” and the only OS available for that was DOS or later Windows

        Of course then Unix-like operating systems started to become available for the same machines, and Apple switched to Intel processors for a while too.

      • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        The term “PC” is derived from the “IBM-compatible Personal Computer”, which basically meant it could run pc-dos and it’s bastard child ms-dos - you guessed it, made by microsoft. Apple computers and many others in those days did not run those shoddy dos (disk operating systems) things, but had real Operating Systems like MacOS, BeOS, Amiga Workbench etc.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    8 months ago

    Java edition has always been superior, but only because it hasnt been bastardized by Microsoft. It’s a shame the price you pay for that is no crossplatform support.

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      You at least have crossplatform between Windows, Mac, Linux, and Android (with Pojav Launcher). So not so bad.

  • asudox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Why not use the Java version? Bedrock sucks anyway. I use ATLauncher to launch the Java edition.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 months ago

    What’s even good about Bedrock edition? Been playing since the 1.7.x days, and Java edition has been consistently superior in my view. If nothing else, it’s better because the table with the floating book is called the Enchanting Table.

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just play Java edition. It’s superior, and does support crossplay, no matter what anyone tells you. Officially between Windows, Linux, and MacOS, natively on Android with Pojav Launcher, and with the geyserMC mod, to any device that runs bedrock edition.

  • voxel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    why do you want to play the inferior bedrock version in the first place?
    it has missing features and the ones that do work are somewhat buggy.
    bedrock has better server netcode tho iirc.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      They reimplemented it in C++, funnily enough to port it to more platforms (mobile and consoles).
      They do still also develop the Java edition. I don’t think, they can afford the shitstorm to deprecate that, as their core fanbase is on that, with all the mods and community servers.

  • Crow
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Check Out the PE (pocket edition) launcher. If you have a license on the Google play store at least. It’s actually not half-bad, runs smoothly and has the regular amount of m&k as well as controller support

  • hallettj@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yeah, I’d like to be able to set my kids up with Bedrock because that’s the version most other kids play, and it would be great for them to be able to play on servers together. I have run the Android version on Linux in the past using a community launcher, and it worked flawlessly with a mouse and keyboard. But I think there was an authentication change that prevents that from working anymore. It’s very frustrating that they have a Linux version, but they just won’t let us use it.

    • voxel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      from my experience, most kids play java tho?

      mostly it’s the only version that:

      1. takes 3 clicks to pirate (not everyone does that, but this is a contributing factor)
      2. available on pc

      bedrock is mostly used by mobile (android/ios) players, which makes up a rather small market share

      • hallettj@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        To clarify, the kids that my kids meet at school who want to play Minecraft with them almost exclusively play Bedrock, often on ipads.

        One of these days I may get around to trying running a server with GeyserMC which purportedly extends a Java server to let Bedrock users connect.