In a significant data breach, hacktivist group NullBulge has infiltrated Disney’s internal Slack infrastructure, leaking 1.2TB of sensitive data. This breach, posted on the cybercrime platform Breach Forums on July 12, 2024, exposes many of Disney’s internal communications, compromising messages, files, code, and other proprietary information.

  • @bamboo
    link
    English
    631 month ago

    I don’t think Slack has a self hosted version, and does not offer IP allow listing. There’s nothing preventing someone to go to https://disney.slack.com/. I think when they say “internal” they mean for internal employees, and not like a thing for fans.

    • @addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      301 month ago

      I think when Disney demands an internally-hosted version of your product, then the sales team tells engineering that they’ll provide one, and mark the price up accordingly. That kind of thing doesn’t appear on the external listing for everyone else.

      • @cmhe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Why would Disney demand that?

        Why would they choose slack if they want to host, maintain and be responsible for the internal chat themselves?

        They choose slack because they do it for them so that they don’t have to do it themselves. That is the selling point for them.

        Businesses buy cloud services, because they do not want to manage stuff themselves.

        • @towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          They can still have support contracts and SLA etc from slack.
          It’s just that the servers slack runs on are on-prem and completely controlled by the business buying into the self hosted licence.
          The benefits should be tighter security (say, can only be accessed via VPN), and for many many MAU probably lower costs. Chances are, Disney already has datacenter ops and hardware contracts.

          And why choose slack? For quite a while, it was extremely common for developers (maybe even industry standard?). It had loads of features in the small market of internal chat programs. And it’s easy to build extensions and integrations for.

          I’m not saying that Disney is running on-prem slack, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they were

        • @anivia@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 month ago

          Providing Disney with an internally hostable version of Slack doesn’t require giving them the code. They can just ship them compiled binaries

    • @UtMan1988@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 month ago

      They do. You pay extra for it. You have to have apache or a web server configured for it, and a lot of space. Source: I configured one like 4 years ago.

        • @weker01@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          231 month ago

          Welcome to the world of B2B where 98% of products are listed nowhere and of those products you get a listing the price is either hidden or not the price anyone really pays.

          • @Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            101 month ago

            That’s what I hate the most in B2B. No transparency. How am I supposed to trust you if we start this way?

        • @drislands@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          I can’t find it now, but my company attempted to get that from Slack and IIRC it was an option but more expensive than they were willing to pay.

      • @ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That sounds like user error on Disney’s part then. My company uses IP whitelisting just fine.