@jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world • 1 month agoLawyers for ‘Rust’ armourer move to get case dismissed after Baldwin trial collapseswww.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1253
arrow-up1253external-linkLawyers for ‘Rust’ armourer move to get case dismissed after Baldwin trial collapseswww.independent.co.uk@jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world • 1 month agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-square@SoleInvictuslink4•1 month ago on more than one occasion talk directors out of using prop firearms that fire blanks That sounds like extremely bad advice. I’m curious, why do you consider substituting a non-operational (filled barrel) firearm for an operational firearm extremely bad advice?
minus-square@Buffalox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•1 month agoObviously because an operational firearm is way more dangerous.
minus-square@SoleInvictuslink2•edit-21 month agoOhhh, I was interpreting the meaning in reverse! I was flabbergasted on why anyone would think an operational firearm is safer than an inoperative prop.
I’m curious, why do you consider substituting a non-operational (filled barrel) firearm for an operational firearm extremely bad advice?
Obviously because an operational firearm is way more dangerous.
Ohhh, I was interpreting the meaning in reverse! I was flabbergasted on why anyone would think an operational firearm is safer than an inoperative prop.