@Rainb0wSkeppy@lemmy.world to 196English • 13 days agoghoti rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1159cross-posted to: linguistics_humor@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1159imageghoti rulelemmy.world@Rainb0wSkeppy@lemmy.world to 196English • 13 days agomessage-square18fedilinkcross-posted to: linguistics_humor@sh.itjust.works
minus-squareJojo, Lady of the Westlink1•2 days agoPretty sure “caught” won and “cot” lost in the caught-cot merger. I don’t think most Americans would conceive of it as an “o” sound
minus-squareZagorathlinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 days agoWhen I hear an American with the caught/cot merger say “caught”, it sounds way more similar to my (unmerged) “cot” than my “caught”
minus-squareJojo, Lady of the Westlink2•2 days agoI believe you. I meant more that it “won” conceptually than phonetically. To an American ear it sounds more like “aw” or “ah” than “o”.
minus-squareZagorathlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 day agoOh yeah, maybe. I don’t really know how you’d measure that.
Pretty sure “caught” won and “cot” lost in the caught-cot merger. I don’t think most Americans would conceive of it as an “o” sound
When I hear an American with the caught/cot merger say “caught”, it sounds way more similar to my (unmerged) “cot” than my “caught”
I believe you. I meant more that it “won” conceptually than phonetically. To an American ear it sounds more like “aw” or “ah” than “o”.
Oh yeah, maybe. I don’t really know how you’d measure that.