• @bolexforsoup
    link
    62 days ago

    I was with you until this one. You can’t expect better quality quality if you don’t participate in the primaries to try and get somebody high quality nominated.

    • @snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 days ago

      That assumes I like any of the choices or that I think a party that regularly ignores their voters would positively change based on my vote.

      I just use them to oppose fascists.

      • @bolexforsoup
        link
        12 days ago

        that assumes I like any of the choices

        No it assumes you actually take the time to vet them or potentially volunteer/work for a campaign to get them on the ballot. Be the change you want to see and all that. Jeering from the sidelines won’t get you anywhere.

        • @snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          So I should vet the single Democrat on the primary ballot for anything other than US president in a state that hasn’t given an electoral college vote to a Democrat since the 1964 election?

          That seems worth my time since I’m going to vote for them anyway!

          • @bolexforsoup
            link
            1
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            There are more elections than just the one for president every four years. If that is the only time you become politically engaged then there is a much larger discussion to be had tbh

            • @snooggums@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 days ago

              So I should vet the single Democrat on the primary ballot for anything other than US president

              This is true for EVERY ELECTION. Unless I personally run for office this will continue to be true, and I am too honest to be in politics.