• pewgar_seemsimandroid
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    it’s just some rocks, by celts. paintings probably do more damage to the environment than rocks

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s not about if the object damages the environment, the point they’re making is that society is ready to spend fortunes preserving old objects while everything around them is going to shit. We don’t have our priorities straight, being able to take a plane to travel thousands of km to go see a painting from the 1600s is more important to us than making sure our neighbors are able to eat or keeping some species alive.

      At some point we’ll have to wake up and face reality, there’s nothing more important than the incoming climate crisis and if we don’t address it, us preserving these paintings and Stonehenge and so on will all have been for nothing as it will be cockroaches that will be left to enjoy them.