LOS ANGELES – President Biden on Saturday night said he expects the winner of this year’s presidential election will likely have the chance to fill two vacancies on the Supreme Court – a decision he warned would be “one of the scariest parts” if his Republican opponent, former President Donald Trump, is successful in his bid for a second term.

  • Gormadt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    I also think 13 is a good number because that would be 1 Supreme Court justice for each circuit court

    But getting to that will be hard and not to mention unless a cap is put in place (I prefer tying it to the number of circuit courts) then the next person who scoots in could expand it further with less push back due to it having been done just recently

    The last thing we need is every president who scoots into office appointing more and more justices until it gets out of hand

    • evatronic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think an “arms race” that forever expands the court – and thus dilutes the individual relevance of a single Justice – is a good thing.

      A single Justice dying or retiring should not be the sort of thing to reshape the entire country.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        “A good thing” is too strong a statement, but I could agree with “not worse than the status quo.”

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The way you do it is to - BOOM! - expand the Court to 13 on Day 1 of the next Biden administration, if Democrats also have both houses of Congress, nuking the Fillibuster if necessary, but delay it’s effect until September 2026.

      Then, go to Republicans and give them a choice. Either we can reform the SC and institute meaningful reform, or Republicans can watch Biden appoint four judges in their 40’s to lifetime appointments, and they can wait until they have the Presidency and both houses of Congress to make a tit-for-tat response. (Biden’s appointments would only be subject to those term limits if the amendment passes before he makes the appointment.)

      We can do a lot in an amendment, including instituting term limits, a firm code of ethics, a better process for confirmation where the Senate can’t just ignore an appointment, and formally fixing the size of the SCOTUS to match the number of appellate courts.