Adults and teens concerned about their screen time are turning in their smartphones for “dumber” models.

Buried in the settings of many smartphones is the option to look up how much on average you are staring at your phone per day.

It can bring an uncomfortable realisation, that what was supposed to be a useful piece of technology has become an obsession.

According to a study by Harvard University, using social networking sites lights up the same part of the brain that is also triggered when taking an addictive substance. This has raised concerns about phone habits among youth.

In the UK, research by Ofcom estimates that around a quarter of children aged five to seven years old now have their own smartphone.

Links have been shown in some studies between use of social media and a negative effect on mental health - especially in children.

  • bolexforsoup
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    You purposely cut off “a lot.” Your comment is completely unnecessary.

    I don’t need a lecture in people’s incorrect idea of digital “ownership.”

    but I acknowledge I’m in a small minority of people, there.

    Then what are you disagreeing with me about?

    • HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      lol genuinely misread you there, however if you read the rest of the comment that typo makes no difference. I’ll correct it

      • bolexforsoup
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It makes a ton of difference. “A lot“ acknowledges that there are people who do and people who don’t keep music locally. You responded as if I said the former doesn’t exist, which is ridiculous because I run my own home server and manage all the media for my family. The point is not everyone is interested in doing this stuff - you even acknowledged you’re in a minority who enjoys managing their own local media. I don’t get what this is even about anymore. What are we even disagreeing about? What warranted this lecture about how we don’t own media (as if I ever said otherwise)?

        It seems like you’re just grinding an ax about something and I don’t quite know why I’m the target. And frankly I don’t now how you could’ve misread it when you even went back to quote it and just cut it off right after the words, but I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt here.