Alexander Smith’s PowerPoint presentation doesn’t appear designed to court controversy. The slides, focused on declining maternal health in Gaza, cite public health data from the United Nations and World Health Organization. His employer, the U.S. Agency for International Development, had selected him to share it at the government agency’s Global Gender Equality Conference.

But just before the conference, an issue of contention emerged.

A single slide mentioned international humanitarian law in context of the health crisis in Gaza. USAID staff cited the slide and discussion of international law as potential fodder for leaks, documents and emails Smith shared with The Intercept show. Despite Smith’s willingness to make revisions, his presentation was eventually canceled. On the last day of the conference, he found himself out of a job.

“I thought it is really obscene that misinformation can go out freely out into the world [about Gaza], but I can’t talk about the reality of starving pregnant women,” said Smith, who worked as a contracted senior adviser at USAID on gender and material health. “We can’t even whisper about that in a conference on that topic.”

  • @Zorsith
    link
    English
    325 days ago

    Outside of leave accrual (which is still inferior compared to the EU), benefits and pay for the average government worker aren’t really any better at this point. Plenty of supervisors pulling 100-150K+, but that usually also includes having to live in high cost of living areas like DC.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      The best benefit is you can’t be terminated without reason. It takes real, documented issues to terminate someone. Very good job security.

      On GS and GG plans you get both cost of living adjustments (depends on wh or Congress) and you get regular raises with step increases.

      The leave is excellent. 4-8hr/2 weeks. And 4 hours sick, no cap. They also can’t deny leave without a reason and rescheduling.

      Health insurance plans are pretty good. HDHP, CO pay, deductible, multiple agencies.

      Pension is a big one. Being able to retire and have a pension, social security, and 5% matching savings plan (traditional and Roth) is pretty much unheard of.

      You also probably have union representation depending on your agency.

      Biggest downside is pay. If you’re technical or very competitive you’ll not make as much. There’s a cap on civilian pay due to a stupid law saying you can’t earn more than the vice president, so every rank is staggered below that. They really need to consolidate ranks below gs5. Those are poverty wages.

      • @psmgx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        525 days ago

        Pension is part of it, but having access to fed gov health insurance after you retire is bigger. My brother retired a FedGov critter and my IRA and 401k from years of corporate work will exceed his pension… But not his insurance.

        Also jealous of his stability and the “retire at 45, start a new life” angle

        • @Zorsith
          link
          English
          225 days ago

          Oof, that is a very good point. The retirement benefits are huuuuge. That said, I have very little trust that these benefits will not be whittled away to nothing by the time I qualify for them.

          If they’re still there by the time i hit retirement age (65 ish now, might be higher later), awesome, but I’m not going to make plans based on that assumption.

        • Neato
          link
          fedilink
          English
          125 days ago

          Yeah, I always forget about carrying the insurance over. My parents have quote a few complaints about Medicare.

          How did he retire at 45? Did his agency approve VERA after 25 years?