• Gormadt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’m someone who owns a few guns and even I think owning .50 cal guns is stupid.

    The ammo is stupid expensive, it kicks like a cladsdale, and there’s nothing you can hunt (legal or otherwise) here that would require it.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      People also don’t know how gigantic and heavy these kind of rifles are. They are mainly to kill vehicules and equipment.

      • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        They are mainly to kill vehicules and equipment.

        Yeah, not really. Vast majority of .50 cal rounds got expended providing enfilade fire or just locking the T&E to absolutely ravage some poor fuckers at a stand off their small arms can’t hope to deal with. I still nut when I hear “when the long axis of the beaten zone coincides with the long axis of the target”.

        I know I’ve fired SLAAP rounds at people through walls more times than I ever fired a fifty at vehicles, and I was specifically on a CAAT team.

        • ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m not surprised with current wars it ends up being used like that but it was originally intended to destroy materiel. Its grandpa used to kill tanks in early WW2 but they got too armored.

          • force@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Actually the development of .50 cal and 13.2mm are completely unrelated, .50 cal wasn’t used for disabling tanks and development of a gun to use it (the Browning machine gun) wasn’t finished until WW1 ended.