• Zorsith
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Apparently an invasive species that affects soil PH, not many animals eat it, it attracts ticks, etc

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      Invasive species are covered by an entirely different set of laws and agency of enforcement.

      I’m ok with putting jurisdiction over all drugs under the DNR.

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I realize the post is about controlled substances, but the comment thread started with

        The idea that something you can just grow yourself like a plant of a fungus is illegal is ridiculous on the face of it.

        The idea that not being able to grow any plant you want is ridiculous is not well thought out. Something being natural doesn’t mean it should be available to anyone.

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I genuinely think the only legal restriction on growing plants should be if there is credible evidence that it harms the local ecology, and then a ban can be bypassed if the harmful plant is grown in an environment that would prevent that harm (eg in an indoor lab setting where seeds/spores/etc wouldn’t be able to escape).