• LadyAutumn
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Half elected officials with power are appointed not elected. The Supreme Court took away women’s bodily autonomy. There was no popular vote for any of them not a single one. Also just because I vote someone in doesn’t mean I agree with everything they do. Wouldn’t it be more expedient to just use direct democracy so I can actually have a say?

    “Your options are conservative A or B, and whatever actions they take are necessarily ones you voted for and agree with!”

    • MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      OK, that’s some US issues.

      But if enough people want something, it’ll happen. It’s just that 50% of the US hates the other 50% and vice versa.

      Abortion has long been a contentious issue and will probably be a big part of the election. Republicans are currently shooting themselves in the foot with that.

      • LadyAutumn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        If enough people want something it’ll happen… how? Like no seriously how? Is there some reason that the people shouldn’t be allowed to directly vote on things? Are you saying that elected officials are reliable in implementing the needs of their constituents? Why is politics so contentious then?

        • MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t think there is a moral reason against direct democracy. You just need enough people to get on board with the idea. But in america the Republicans would loose a lot of power, so they won’t vote for it.

          Elected officials are relatively reliable. Maybe not for needs, but for wants. Biden for example made increasing demands of Israel, as popular opinion (of his voterbase) shifted. Sadly nobody cares about smaller issues, so there isn’t really pressure to change e.g. right to repair. Maybe on local level smaller stuff can change.

          Politics is so contentious, because the algorithms feed us different realities. If I was reading conservative news 24/7 I might also start thinking that climate change doesn’t exist, the gays are coming for my children etc.

          There is similar stuff on the left, just not as widespread. Democratic voters are on average moderate CNN-watching boomers.

          No idea how to fix this. Similar issues are starting here in Germany, but a bit less. I think the “Tagesschau” and similar news are probably a big reason Germany is relatively moderate compared to others.