I used to downvote fairly often on Reddit as a sign to disagree or to push down really disgusting bigoted comments. And to be honest, it became a habit to just downvote without replying. However, now that I’m on lemmy and not Reddit I’ve been actively trying to not instantly downvote things and instead move on or take the time to reply. Has anyone else been trying to do this?

  • Evelyn
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    My instance has downvoting disabled and honestly I’m glad it is. Downvoting never seemed to add anything to Reddit. If a comment isn’t popular then people just won’t upvote it

      • mustyOrange@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Exactly, and I think that there’s even more downsides as well to strictly comment level disagreement. There’s never any point engaging with bigoted posts. Replies just draw more attention and make you more angry. Better to just downvote, report, and move on without spending too much emotional energy trying to bicker and squabble for a while thread.

        There’s just an emotional inequity when it comes to a debate between, for example, a transphobe and a trans person. A transphobe likely knows everything they say can be bullshit - they don’t have to stick to reason. The whole point is just a rhetorical exercise where the cruelty and sadism is the point.

        The trans person tho has to stick to researching the dsm v or guidances from credible medical institutions and respond with effort posts and Yada Yada. Everyone’s eyes glaze over and the end result is the trans person is exhausted and feels worse about their life.

        Downvote and move on is just a means of reduction of digital self harm. I find it bad to not have it for cases like that, especially on communities where mods aren’t as caring about bigotry. To leave it unchallenged just shows that some people agree with it, and shows nothing to effect of how many people find it repulsive.

    • ButterBiscuits@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hard disagree. Down votes shouldn’t be disabled, and I’m disappointed that Beehaw has chosen to do this.

      What about comments that give dangerous advice to an unknowing audience?

      That’s one good reason for down votes. People may upvote it not knowing any better, and when someone comes along to correct them, the damage is done. Other knowledgeable people can’t downvote it to make sure that dangerous advice gets pushed to the bottom, they just have to hope those that upvoted come back, see the rest of the discussion, and remove their upvote.

      • LogarithmicCamel@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, you should reply and explain why the advice is dangerous. A comment might be downvoted for all sorts of reasons and so it doesn’t send a clear message. Downvoting is like grounding your kids just because you are angry, without explaining what they did wrong. They will just conclude you are an arsehole that will punish them whenever you fancy. Which is exactly my opinion of redditors and why I stopped posting there.

    • mrmanager@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Totally agree with this. I never downvote anything because it’s stupid in my opinion. It just sends a message that certain opinions are not welcome. I don’t want to only talk to people I agree with.

    • BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That assumes there aren’t any popular opinions that you don’t agree with in the slightest.