With a electoral system like Ranked Choice voting, people would feel safe to vote for whomsoever they wish, as their vote would still be counted even if their preference didn’t win.

Just search for videos on FPTP voting if you want an explanation on how and why the spoiler effect exists.

Electoral reform is possible in each individual state (for now), we dont need federal reform! Maine and Alaska have already passed electoral reform.

Republicans are moving to make alternative electoral systems illegal in their states. Republicans LOVE first past the post voting. Just sbsolutely adore it. Why would you want to use the same voting system republicans want?

More political parties means a higher percentage of the population is represented by their choices in the voting booth. More people involved in the electoral process, more people engaged.

Its a win win win all around for not just the people, but also for the democratic party. More people voting means more democratic votes. The numbers dont lie. So what’s the hold up blue states?

Some day we will be able to vote for who best represents our interests. We won’t need to grovel on our knees, begging for representationin government. We won’t need to wait for the Republican party to stop existing.

We can do it right now. We don’t have to get over a damn thing. If anyone needs to get over themselves, it would be the democrats who assume they are the only way forward.

Consider starting a campaign to change how we vote in your own state! Force our representatives to compete with fresh outside ideas. We deserve the best representation, not excuses.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    OK Boomer.


    I’m voting for Biden but I’m not obligated to be excited or happy about it or to not critique it for the DNC. It’s a choice between a lawful neutral (at best) milquetoast waffling imperial fuckhead and an outright chaotic evil dictatorial megalomaniac imperial fuckhead. One choice is clearly superior but that’s the choice that’s also dangling the more dangerous choice over me like a threat as the only reason to vote for them. That’s pretty fucking abusive, if you ask me.

    Talking down to voters with stuff like “Why don’t you go run for something, then?” worked out so well for her before, right?

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well said. The two front runners are like creepy old lords from Game of Thrones or something. One is much worse, but neither is good.

      The Clintons need to retire quietly, nobody wants their input.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        One is much worse, but neither is good.

        Given that one of them will be president after the election, it should be obvious that preventing the much worse option is in everyone’s best interest.

        • msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s like the fucking Trolley problem, but blaming the entire setup on the person next to the switch.

          Who put that person there? Why are we shifting the blame on them? Stop the trolley, don’t act all smug pointing fingers screaming “noone normal would let the trolley go straight”.

    • scaredoftrumpwinning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      South Park called it long ago and it still fits. It fits with Hillary and Trump back in 2016 and today. It’s a choice between a shit sandwich and a douche bag. They just missed the part where one is hell bent on destroying our democracy and then added a season with Mr Garrison as president.

      Now we are repeating history and might put “Garrison” in charge again. I never liked history but I didn’t think we were this dumb it hasn’t even been a decade but that’s more to do with brain washing