• @StoneGender
    link
    993 months ago

    Not everywhere. Many places its much more sustainable to make clothes from the animals you are eating and it makes sure that you aren’t wasting any of the life you’ve taken that you need to survive.

    • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Wool is one of those natural fibers that can be harvested without harming the animal. Even if you end up eating the goat/sheep, it can provide a few coats of wool before hand.

      • @StoneGender
        link
        143 months ago

        Yes this is true but a lot of places can’t mantain a sheep herd, because it is too cold or to dry for grasses and food for the sheep

        • Ben Hur Horse Race
          link
          fedilink
          313 months ago

          In Ireland where there are a lot of sheep theyre an ecological disaster (if you think having biologically diverse forests is a good thing)

      • @el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        553 months ago

        True…and you don’t need to live in a house, or use the Internet, or have a bank account, or have a computer/mobile…all things that have caused catastrophic damage to the environment and killed countless animals.

        One has to draw a line somewhere- perhaps you shouldn’t be holier than though just because you draw the line at “I don’t want to see the evidence of the death”

          • trevor
            link
            English
            73 months ago

            Just a very common case of leftists being anti-exploitation until it involves reconsidering what goes on their plates.

      • @StoneGender
        link
        193 months ago

        Maybe YOU don’t have to eat animals to survive. What a privilege u you have that you live in a place where vegetation can be grown in your area or more likely shipped there cheaply(not free of harm to the environment or people\animals). But your experience is not universal there are places on earth that people live where that is not an option. And some of those people have been living there sustainably for 10s of thousands of years. Not to speak of people who’s body needs meat to live because of some other reason. You can not eat animals and that’s fine but it doesn’t replace the science of how to stop environmental damage.

        • @Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          183 months ago

          Obviously if someone needs to eat meat to live I’m not going to object. And people living sustainably and not just supporting the animal ag industry are also off the hook in my books.

          But in regards to your weird vegetation stuff, I hope you’re aware that the livestock are raised on vegetation and will typically consume more calories of feed than they provide with meat? This is a large part of why the Amazon is being deforested, it’s to feed livestock, not vegans. The science on how to stop environmental damage is pretty clear on that one.

      • @frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        93 months ago

        Vegans in western cultures have access to dietary supplements derived from non-animal sources. That’s basically impossible without access to modern industrial food processes.

        If we’re talking about cultures without ready access to plant fibers for clothes, then they’re not going to have vegan supplements, either.