• DingoBilly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        We all want them absent. But then it sort of defeats the point of OPs post saying that BlueSky is filled with bigots when the reality is everywhere has them.

    • AdaA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      They’re not on my instances or any instance I federate with.

      • DingoBilly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        Just because you are not aware doesn’t mean they don’t exist.

        Reading into blahaj.zoje more, plenty of queer folk are friendly and supportive, but plenty are also pieces of shit. Sometimes you may also not realize if you create an echo chamber what is acceptable and what bleeds into extremist rhetoric.

        • AdaA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          6 months ago

          I don’t give a crap about “echo chambers”. I give a crap about creating a safe environment for a group of folk that are actively under attack.

          And that means getting rid of the bigots, not just hiding them

          • DingoBilly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            I get wanting a safe space from persecution.

            But echo chambers are dangerous and can really distort your reality. I personally find going from a safe space/echo chamber to reality very jarring and much more conflicting than from a relatively safe space with some conflict to reality.

            By shutting it all out I’d argue you are risking hurting yourself unless you can guarantee a safe space in every aspect of life which is very difficult.

            • AdaA
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              6 months ago

              But echo chambers are dangerous

              Not as dangerous as the hate trans people face every single day from the government, from media and from society at large.

              People need a space where they can let their guard down. Creating that space is my goal.

              The sad truth is, no space ever lets us completely let our guard down, but we get as close as we can.

              unless you can guarantee a safe space in every aspect of life which is very difficult.

              Communities trying to make spaces as safe as possible isn’t some slippery slope. This is either disingenuous or ignorant of the reality we face as trans folk.

              There are no truly safe spaces for us. Even our safe spaces aren’t completely safe, because bad faith folk do their best to make it that way. Yet even so, many of us benefit from spaces that are actively inclusive, and remove bigots. Appeals to slippery slopes, or implications that we simply don’t understand how looking after our own needs is somehow bad don’t change our lived reality

                • AdaA
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I’ve been building and developing communities, queer and otherwise for decades. I’m also trans, and live it first hand.

                  The per user approach puts a cost on each and every user, and that cost can sometimes be too much for vulnerable folk dealing with harassment. Blocking the bigot with a throw away account after being exposed to the bigotry is pointless, because the account was going to be abandoned anyway, and you’ve already been exposed to the raw hate.

                  It makes it impossible to just have fun and enjoy your social media experience when you’re always waiting for the next bigot to drop it.

                  Instance level blocking resolves a lot of that.

                  Your theory of what will work just doesn’t cut it for many vulnerable folk, and it’s not going to start cutting it just because you want to debate the topic.

            • planish@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              6 months ago

              Echo chambers aren’t that bad. I don’t surround myself with people and things I like because the ones I don’t like are going to hurt me, I do it because I don’t like them and my life is too short to waste with their nonsense.

          • planish@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            You can kick bigots off a Bluesky PDS.

            But letting everyone label accounts and posts and run feeds of moderation advice is a lot quicker at booting someone from the virtual space than waiting around for someone to come and decide that yes, so-and-so really has broken BigPDSHost policy and shall be deleted. It’s also a great way to find who you want to boot.

            • AdaA
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Right, but it’s reactive and on a per user basis.

              • planish@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Like, each user is individually kicked off the PDS in reaction to some bad thing they did? Or labeling is reactive in that it labels bad stuff already posted, and each user has to pick labelers to listen to themselves?

                I’m not sure if Bluesky’s front-end defaults to using some particular labelers. I know there’s some moderation going on for you as soon as you log in, done by someone.

                But yes, each user has to choose whose moderation decisions they want to use, and they can’t rely on everyone they can see also seeing exactly the same space they themselves are seeing. But I’m not sure it’s possible or even desirable to get rid of the requirement/ability to choose your mods. I should be able to be in a community that has mods I trust, and the community chatting to itself and determining that so-and-so is a great mod who we should all listen to, and then all listening to them, sounds like a good idea to me.

                Being able to see and talk to people who aren’t in the same space I’m in might not be as good?

                • AdaA
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  That’s literally how moderation on Bluesky works… You choose the people you want to moderate and curate your feed…

            • AdaA
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              No, what leads to those attacks is politicians creating and stoking culture wars, and a media feeding in to that war because it makes them money.

              The attacks won’t magically stop if trans people just make themselves more open to being attacked. All that will happen is more of us will get hurt or die.

    • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      While sometimes it’s impossible to make sure that an environment is completely free of bigots (or any sort of bad faith actor), if you don’t get rid of the ones that you see, they’ll eventually take over the space.

      And “getting rid of them” doesn’t mean to simply hiding them from your sight (what effectively Bluesky does). It’s just a nest of cockroaches, you know? It’s still breeding inside your wall, even if you don’t see it.