For anyone wondering if Threads and Facebook at large will be a fine neighbor in the space and compatible with other apps/services in the fediverse: they’re already automatically hiding comments that mention Pixelfed https://mastodon.social/@dansup/112126250737482807

  • Queue
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    8 months ago

    I wish I could go back to a Lemmy thread showing how Mastodon and other Fediverse instances were blocking Meta ahead of it’s integration, where people went “Oh you’re just being paranoid, why would they do that?” And when given examples of companies taking open standards and either making themselves the biggest source of users or killing it (Microsoft, Google, Apple) they either went “Well that happened in 2006, it’s 2023!”

    I know the bootlickers wouldn’t actually change their mind, but jesus christ. It’s frustrating for groups of advocates to be ignored and proven right each time. Cassandra syndrome is real.

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          I just feel like this strategy won’t work for activitypub. The whole idea is to make interoperable web platforms. If meta tries to damage that then I don’t see why activitypub developers would cooperate when it’s against the whole purpose of the project.

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I don’t think you have to know how the poison works to know the snake bite will kill you.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook#Criticisms_and_controversies

            They will come here (edit: They HAVE come here) with a goal of exploiting and controlling the fediverse. You and I don’t have to know how they will do that in order for it to be true. Scrubbing links to a product that competes with Instagram from threads seems like a decent start though.

            • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              I mean I am completely unsurprised by their misbehavior, I’m just slightly more optimistic about our ability to resist them.

              That said, the one danger I can see is Meta gaining more authority over the activitypub developers. That is probably something worth being vigilant about.

              • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                I’m just slightly more optimistic about our ability to resist them.

                What form would such resistance take if not advocating loudly for defederation?

          • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            it will not, but theres a hate-fetish for meta on lemmy and logic has nothing to do with it.

            its all ‘but they are bad actors’ but never ‘this is the technical way they will extend the protocol to weaken it’ because there isnt anything.

            threads is just another instance moderating inbound content. somehow thats going to kill thousands of independent pieces of software.

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      what exactly is meta doing thats different than every other fedinstance moderating inbound content?

      cuz its nothing. nothing beyond that. but hey, get your meta-hate fetish on.