I have a client with locally hosted security cameras. There is a DVR box that has a port open and a 3rd party app you can view the cameras from. Traditionally we have been forwarding the port to the WAN via the router there. Its a restaraunt btw.

When the ISP upgrades the router every few years there’s a huge headache trying to get the ports back open and bridging the modem and router blah blah blah. Not only this, even though they are supposed to have a static wan ip, it does change from time to time.

What i would like to do is plug in a raspberry pi on the network and forward the DVR’s ports somewhere accessable.

Im thinking of something along the lines of wireguard, but just for a single ip/port that i can tunnel over ngrok. Seems doable but i’m having trouble finding the proper terms to google. Port forwarding generally brings up router config, and tunnelling seems to expect you to be on the device who’s ports you wish to access.

Any advice?

  • MangoPenguin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Something ive noticed from using wireguard from my phone is my traffic across the board slows down significantly while connected because everything is routed back home.

    This is a config issue, you have your VPN set as the default gateway instead of just for the specific subnet of your home network.

    By default tailscale will not be a default gateway or subnet router, it will only give access between 2 devices with tailscale installed.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yea, gotta turn off using an Exit Node that’s on that network.

      Also, sometimes Tailscale’s Magic DNS seems to override other name resolution and will route over Tailscale instead if another network (eg LAN). You can avoid this by using IP addresses instead of DNS if you have issues.

      For example, when I’m home and try to RDP to my server, sometimes TS DNS resolves the name and routes over TS, although it’s on the same LAN. If I RDP via the IP address of my server, it’s noticeably faster. If I turn off Tailscale, it’s faster, even using DNS, because then it resolves to the local, not TS, address.

      So basically, if I disable/re-enable TS on my laptop, DNS works fine. Think it’s just a bug.

    • dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Oh that makes sense because when i originally set it up, i did want all traffic routed through it. I guess i didnt realize it didnt have to be