@Dehydrated@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish • 6 months agoPeak engineeringlemmy.worldimagemessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up11.06K
arrow-up11.06KimagePeak engineeringlemmy.world@Dehydrated@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish • 6 months agomessage-square66fedilink
minus-square@TheBlue22linkEnglish94•6 months agoHow the actual fuck did this get through QA and production?
minus-square@Tyfud@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkEnglish56•6 months agoThe protective boot is optional on the RJ45 CAT5/6 specification. I suspect they likely didn’t test with all the different RJ45 variants dongles.
minus-square@Patches@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish25•edit-26 months agoIf the client has enough money for Cisco hardware they can definitely afford the boogie RJ45 with Booties.
minus-square@Madison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish34•6 months agoBougie, unless they’re just funky as fuck.
minus-square@problematicPanther@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish9•6 months agoi read it exactly as it was written and now I’m imagining RJ45s in an earth wind and fire music video
minus-square@Patches@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish23•edit-26 months agoQA budget is real low. They can only afford the ones that are bare copper stuffed into a RJ45. If they’re lucky a DIY job with no exposed pairs outside the RJ45
How the actual fuck did this get through QA and production?
The protective boot is optional on the RJ45 CAT5/6 specification. I suspect they likely didn’t test with all the different RJ45 variants dongles.
If the client has enough money for Cisco hardware they can definitely afford the boogie RJ45 with Booties.
Bougie, unless they’re just funky as fuck.
i read it exactly as it was written and now I’m imagining RJ45s in an earth wind and fire music video
QA budget is real low. They can only afford the ones that are bare copper stuffed into a RJ45.
If they’re lucky a DIY job with no exposed pairs outside the RJ45